Member Info for RealityChap

How can the size of the contract be over-estimated or under-estimated when we haven't the faintest idea how much it is worth?

CN. Of course a new CEO would have to be the subject of a regulatory announcement, you can't seriously think otherwise?

What odds do you want?

Good point Mandy! We can continue to have hope, but not expectation...

So with no pre-market RNS this morning it's pretty evident that there won't/can't be anything much more than platitudes in the call this morning. Hard to imagine a drift further into the second half of the year with minimal real news.

The size of the markets is not in doubt. Clearly AFC's ability to take advantage is

We live in hope of some positive news because it has been a long time since we had anything specific and meaningful about the only thing that matters - real orders, delivered and cold hard cash received. Sadly, it is hope rather than expectation

Orders are not announced via an Investor Meet call at 10am in the morning. I expect nothing other than soothing tones tomorrow

Remind me how long the 10kw has been on the market?

The longer it takes the clearer it will become that it was AB's decision. If he was pushed by the Board I would expect that they would have had a few irons in fires for a replacement

Orders are clearly not coming in thick and fast. Material orders would clearly be price sensitive and there have been no announcements at all for quite some time. Equally clearly there is optimism that there will be orders forthcoming but that's all it is for now

Ammonia Cracker orders coming in thick and fast? What are you on and can I have some??

the credibility of the brokers issuing these notes has the same credibility rating as afc units have emissions. it's all **** and water

But has that £6m figure been reassessed and revalidated or just left as it is? Because for all the bluster there's not the faintest shadow of doubt that deliveries are not on track as planned - ref. Acciona

Lots of people seem to have trouble distinguishing between 'lying' and 'saying things that turn out not to be the case'.

Quite a difference.

If they are negotiating a takeover then I'd say that it would be a misleading announcement

If they are really negotiating a takeover and have put out a completely false statement re succession to a new CEO (and by they I mean the authorised broker) then it will hit the fan. You're dreaming Ken.

I can't see any logic whatsoever in thinking this could be a prelude to a takeover, none at all. In those sort of circumstances CEOs would quite often be given an incentive to stay during that fairly finite period.

A trade takeover is very unlikely in my eyes but I can see good reasons why the management might seek backing to take the company private and away from public markets, particularly if they are remotely close to being correct about the value of the cracker.

Problem with that is that many PE backers look first and foremost for cashflow and we know there's not much of that!

But a couple of biotech companies have delisted from AIM recently and they found a way.

Hang on a minute. A couple of hours ago it was because there was a takeover in the offing!

Nothing to do with the Post Office being a branch of the civil service then..