Member Info for ratcliffewriter

Don't worry badman, VAL shares only have to hit £77.73p each with a mcap approaching 8 billion and you'll break even. That's as long as the bod don't do another placing before then.

That particular nugget posts on the 'dark side' - used to post here but got banned some years ago, to the surprise of very few.

Whatever logjam or hitch there was first thing has now cleared it seems, but it was unusual.

Can't get a price to buy even 1000 shares. Is it just a glitch or is there some demand going on?

They can only present information already in the public domain at these events, so eill we have another RNS before then with a further update? I imagine so. And will it say 'cutting edge science' or 'ooh eck, it's not going to plan at all'?
Somehow I'd lean towards the former...

Not quite hasiba - crackin was talking of a placing at 15p (the previous one he promoted was 5p and that didn't happen either) so basically it's 'wrong again sunshine' - the fact remains that shares rise on money coming in, and slide gently in the absence of positive money related news. This decline is absolutely no surprise to me whatsoever, but as others (dare I say genuinely astute posters) will know, the science and commercial potential looks rock solid for the future.
P.S. when I say 'astute' I don't mean the self proclaimed 'astute' scumbags from elsewhere and their acolytes.

Very true crackin, very true.

Given the track record of financial management and tailoring work to fit the funds available, I would think they know exactly how further money needs will be addressed. Whatever made Redmile invest in a tiny bio on the far side of the world from them has now grown into a series of trials, further science, and of course the first licensing deal. The investment case grows stronger, but also worth wondering (among other possibilities) at what point the first stage payment might come from Genmab, and how much might that be for?

Indeed roses - a few intermittent visitors will feel cheated that their expert posting has been thwarted.

It's not just that though is it? Inanaco makes long term predictions on some pretty thorough research, crackin is just a sh*t stirrer who couldn't care less.

WTP - Makes you wonder why he doesn't give crackin as much stick for his predictions as he does inanaco for his.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4585613-roche-ongoing-pipeline-issues-sap-growth-increase-m-and-a-likelihood

'As you know I make little attempt to hide my identity' versus 'info that clearly identifies me specifically.'
If there is any particular difference between those two statements I would not be in the least bit interested to know. You also label inanaco as 'my friend' - he isn't, he is a poster for whom you nurse an apparent simmering hatred and the tone of most of your posts stems from that.
As for others having a 'negative agenda' - you've been here long enough to know that is absolutely true.
So if you think calling out your non sequiturs quakifies as 'keyboard warrior style' then carry on believing it. That's about the end if it - better things are most likely coming than exercising your paranoia.

Come now Ivy - you ask 'what are your current valuations of SCLP based on current DTH response?' yet you have known me posting here long enough to remember full well that I have never ever made any prediction on possible price for the share, for very obvious reasons. I have always been perfectly consistent on that. You, however, seem to be hypocritically inconsistent - you have had posts removed repeatedly for posting personal information about me, despite being very aware that it constitutes a breach of posting rules - yet this morning you were over on the dark side begging inanaco not to post personal information about you on the grounds of privacy.

I don't intend to get into a lengthy post trawl on this one, I'll just say that I posted an opinion on what was to me a deliberate belittling of something that appears very significant, and the strong belief that had the DTH reaction been less than 100 percent those same voices would have made great negative play of it. If seven others agree sufficiently to 'rec' my view, then I am obviously not the only one who thinks this. Maybe you should ask the other seven why they agree with me too? Or just leave it as an observation which Ruck and Ivy disagree with - not an unusual occurrence after all.

Amusing that the 100 percent DTH response is talked down as a sideshow by certain contributors, yet had it been (say) a 30 percent response you'd find the same people saying how significant a higher response rate could be.

If DTH were not significant I can't see that it would have been mentioned in the first place, so let's assume at the very least it is significant. On top of that we have Prof Christian Ottensmeier saying they will work out '...in which settings it will have maximum benefit to patients' - note not 'some benefit', but 'maximum benefit', and then observe the fact it has occurred in 23 out of 23 patients so far. Sounds promising.

Agreed Wildforce. And in black or white terms, I'd rather have a share with apparently cutting edge science and some head scratching about a low sp than a higher sp that seems built on sand.

Oh please Ivy - I don't know what you're smoking, but I'll avoid it if I ever find out. I have no idea what pressure you imagine I'm under - I have a delightfully peaceful comfortableand low stress existence. You don't need to go off on one just because you made a fool of yourself in the other board, and given that I don't post there I fail to see how you see any connection between me and the poster to whom you refer, and from whom you seem to have had a proper kicking, prompting your reappearance here after months of avoiding it in keeping with your rather dismissive comments about lse 'over there.'
The stress of monthly sales targets of dog food or whatever it is you do to earn a crust seems to be getting to you. Maybe time to go back to your Francophile FRIENDS on the other BOARD.

Of course you were, of course. It's so long ago on that board that nobody will really have time or energy tonight back and see. I presume you are flitting back here after getting a good credibility bashing from inanaco over there, and once the dust has settled you'll be back there pontificating as ever. But maybe just lay low here for a bit - how unfortunate that some read both boards. Moat inconvenient. Anyway, carry on - your contributions are appreciated to the same level as ever.