Member Info for ratcliffewriter

Watch it Marcus, you'll be getting your thighs slapped for posting factual things. I would do it myself, but my hands are sore from clapping along so much.

Exactly Krafty. And the exact words were '....waiting for that moment to go out and shout about it, it’s just that little bit too soon. But soon - we’re getting there definitely, that’s the exciting bit.'

That was last November, and that's well within 'soon' when it comes to the sort of timescales involved in trials imo. Generally only bad news like trial stoppages comes out quickly, and we know that they are now injecting cohort 4, so progress is presumably at the very least satisfactory.

I remember also LD saying she couldn't quite believe the results (or words to that effect) in the early stages. Imo if something is unexpectedly promising then the one thing a sensible scientist will do is check and recheck and check again, needing to be rock-solid certain of the data before announcing anything. Hence why the clamouring for results potentially ahead of confirmation is fruitless and short-sighted.

The absent Knowlesi (with whom I now play golf occasionally, by a bizarre series of coincidences) used to demand to be kept abreast of everything at all times, but now accepts that was never going to happen, more of an aspirational trading ploy than anything else.

Let's see what develops from these events in America anyway.

It might even be good, if not godd....

It would be godd to have a comprehensive update, but at the very least, the data up to February was very positive, and whatever has happened since has been good enough to advance to cohort 4 having started, no delays in getting approval etc. See what Monday onwards brings anyway.

Four times must be some sort of record. Maybe they'll give you a discount in a dose of covidity and see if it improves things. Anyway, speedy recovery and look forward to a resumption of your observations and opinion.

Three spring to mind immediately.

Mice and Monkeys work in boiler rooms I presume.

WTP - yes. As with so many things in life, it's not what you do but how you go about it. Some excellent examples on here over the years, some still lingering too.

i've always had the impression that ld has sufficient confident in the science without having to play the sp to a gallery of aim trading ****roaches.

PM2022 - 'Thank you for highlighting the previous 125:1 consolidation. Great point.'

Thanks - but it's consolodationS plural. Not singular.

NOTE CAREFULLY CLINICAL TRIALS ARE EXPENSIVE. (Needs cash - lots of hard cash, you are right) VALIRX DOES NOT DO CLINICAL TRIALS ANYMORE (So they'll need to find someone prepared to do DD and get theirbhand in a very deep pocket) SPEND PER YEAR IS JUST OVER 2 MILLION ONLY. ONLY 100 MILLION SHARES. (Number of shares is less relevant than cash in bank, but presumably the impending financial will provide a better picture of the prospects)

Porky9 - I believe all three consolidations were 125:1

This means if you'd put a million pounds in before the first one it would now be worth about 51p.

Food for thought.

Have you reminded Inanaco 'over there' that great minds on here have spoken - 'It doesn't matter what anyone "thinks of the science".'

Remind me to email the Clatterbridge team that whatever they may think, it is entirely irrelevant.

Violindog - 'is logic so disconnected with reality??'

As far as AIM is concerned, yes!

I had a distinct feeling in my water, but the antibiotics have cleared it up nicely.

To be fair, he's over 100 percent above his 5p call from last month, and probably about as accurate.

Haven't heard Black Cat Bio mentioned for a while - on companies house they have 2 directors, accountant Mr Wulstenhulme, and the other Miss Zhang Chen, an 'International business manager', both of whom give the same address which is actually just an accommodation address it seems.

Accounts show net assets of 68 grand, and no activity of notes in the last 3 years. Weren't Black Cat setting out to raise 5 million quid? If so, what's happened? Any suggestions?

Https://seekingalpha.com/news/3971001-cancer-therapies-spending-set-surge-through-end-decade?ref=biztoc.com

Berm - wasn't that without a checkpoint inhibitor, so pure Modi1?

Having said that, the article didn't contain anything that wasn't released in February, although it added a name and a face and some opinion. Intriguing as to timing, but maybe it's just hospital PR or the paper finding a 'feel good' story. On the other hand, imo it's not the kind of story that a hospital or trial boss would sanction if events since February weren't encouraging.

Hoping for 'Congratulations!' rather than 'Those were the days.'