Member Info for ratcliffewriter

Laura - you say 'some can't get funding' - but VAL have had extension after extension waiting for TheoremRX to get less than a year's funding, with no change in aspects like 201 unmoved since what? 3 years ago? So may of the comments here need the words 'in my opinion' or a few 'ifs' or 'all being well' addenda as there really doesn't seem to be anything concrete, just a lot of hope and optimism based on nothing concrete. The next week or so will tell, so let's see anyway.

I'm quite certain that you bought at the very lowest and sold on the tip of a peak, timing it all to expert perfection. It's what you always do, though you usually say it yourself.

A familiar line, if a little dated after all this time

https://youtu.be/V7NlFWh7Sz8?si=IVYptpwTLPvC8j8r

Results published, no suspension then (to the disappointment of some, no doubt)

That well known fount of financial advice The Dhaka Tribune.'

It has strong echoes of a few blurred lines from allegedly thirsty 'journalist' TW. Probably coincidence though.

'All the timelines would have been discussed and analysed already by the BOD.'

Very true. It's what they decide to do as a consequence that will prove interesting.

Sounds more like a bit of fearmongering to be honest.

Perhaps they want an inflatable lab assistant to go with the cardboard buildings?

'Including...tumour samples.'

Are some of these the post MOD1 tumour analyses I wonder? Enough work coming in to require an extra member of staff, and a well qualified one at that, not just a broom-pusher or tea stirrer.

Tommy - I assume anyone who is not invested here is welcome if they extol the virtues of the company, but it's just any probing questions as to the potential viability of Val that are discouraged? You know, the sort of questions that need to be asked and answered before committing money to an investment.

It was going to be 6, but I left out 'desperate.'

You could also say Dilly's Dire Dithering Does Diddlysquat. But it won't make any difference to the facts, so maybe concentrate on them.

If they walk away it will be like a kick in the tentacles.

Sqidd?

Anyone got L2 and an opinion on current sp movement? Is this my last opportunity to load up on a dip or do I stand well back and be glad I didn't? Opinions either way welcome as usual.

Strange he doesn't post 'risen from 13 to 13.5 on no news yesterday - what's behind the rise?'

Mind you, with a TW link any credibility goes straight out of the window.

Sam - you want to pretend it is true but have no evidence to back up your assertion, it just helps persuade people to a way of thinking without offering facts. Do you have a hidden prospectus on this theme too...? A familiar pattern emerging here...

I'd have thought it would bring them and their crew great satisfaction that with a few clicks of the mouse they could silence everyone who disagreed with them, and actually gain some credibility. A strange philosophy otherwise, but then if hurling abuse and not silencing critics is the bag you're all into, then it doesn't bode well for this board until the massive rise/placing EGM come about. (Delete as applicable on the massive rise/placing egm option)

Aimlower100 - if you want to see a post with actual defamatory lies, just have a look at SamBar and his childish abuse at 16.19 today. Quite staggering that those who would try to convince the unwary that they are on the verge of enormous profit would need even to consider such abuse. I'd have thought a nice simple link to a detailed prospectus of a 100 million investment fund would be much more professional, and a lot less writing too. Just a quick copy and paste. So easy. If such a thing exists. I have substantial funds ready if you can show me the proof.

The missing prospectus might be written on gold plates and only the leader can read it (then it gets lost, à la Book of Mormon)