Member Info for ratcliffewriter

One has to share the love. Can't be too greedy after all.

Ok I was just being modest. I bought the other 9 million that haven't been declared yet. I just didn't like to brag.

So pleased I managed to get those 6 million at 3.70p the other day.

Desperate? Hardly. Pumping? Please cut and paste any of my posts that qualify for that label. But please, try doing some research first. Who knows, you might even find it informative. Anyway, how does the beaten troll line go? Oh yes - 'I have to go now....'

Love it 1970 - you say 'not here trying to say I know everything' - the one true and verifiable thing you've posted. Your utter lack any form of research or even basic knowledge in relation to your initial post is pathetic. Shown up (yet again) for your real reasons for posting here.

How could anyone ever doubt what you post year 1970? The consistency of your track record speaks for itself.

Good old year1970. Very short on facts surrounding the City Financial demise. Poor effort, should try harder. Or better still, don't bother. Your low-fact diet shows you in your usual poor light.

He's been a lot better at spotting them than you have pal!

Well we should get a holdings RNS relating to City Financial's percentage holding if it's them. Here's hoping!!

I'm sure all will be revealed in due course, but I imagine it's either a sudden clear out by City Financial or a placing.

indeed not!

So after years of accumulating and averaging down you are still sitting on a 60 percent loss and need a rise of 140 percent just to break even. And yet when I was talking of buying in at 1.3 I was urged to get the cheque book out because 'it can't go much lower'! Glad I trusted my instincts and research rather than the mad rampers. Will I ever buy in? Only when I feel the time is right, if that point ever comes. And given the latest shenanigans I'm still far from convinced.

Why should anyone be bothered at you raising hares Drac? My cousin used to breed rabbits. You seem to have a pharmaceutical approach in that you 'dispense with accuracy.'

Just the negative ones? How unbalanced.

And if I'm not mistaken, scancell hold the patent in all cancer treatments by this method. The 'Land Grab', which will not have gone unnoticed in certain circles.

How many social workers does it take to change a light bulb? Five - one to replace the bulb while four other write a pamphlet entitled 'coping with darkness.'

That's not very healthy. Better to have a balanced diet - a pie in each hand.

Very rude indeed. I believe the medical term is pieabetic. Or salad dodger.

At which point Valiseek move in, pay the shortfall and walk off with the ip? That's one possibility that has been raised here before.

So roses - is there a possible scenario where they could end up owing as much as they've raised if the penalty terms are fulfilled by a sufficiently large drop in the sp? Or at least end up with so little money as to be back where they started very quickly? If so, what happens then?