Member Info for ratcliffewriter

Thanks for that cars. I presume some will read that as mindless ramping, some will view it as a decent summary, and others may find they feel threatened by something in it, but it seems fair enough to me.

Anyone able to read deeper into the premium content on share prophets - Gary Newman just put up an article headed 'Scancell is still a high risk play but offers value at the current price.' I'd be interested to see what he says but unwilling to contribute directly or indirectly to the Winnifrith booze fund.

So you know what I have invested and where? Do you Knowlesi? That means you must be either my stockbroker, my financial advisor, or a bad guessing fantasist. Now, the last time I looked you weren't my stockbroker, you weren't my financial advisor, so what does that make you?

And it's pray, not prey. Just saying....

Heads he's right, tails he's not wrong. Just claims 'victim' when called out.

Entirely agree WF. I'll nail my colours to the same mast as well. Unlike some who cover all bases with waffle and then claim to have 'called it right' using perfect scatter gun hindsight after the event. I believe a lot is going on and the future is looking good.

Should read NOT insurmountable!!

I would imagine that the categorical re-affirmation of Keith Flaherty continuing to be involved, and the fact there are trial sites in America means that the delay (while very protracted) is insurmountable and clerical or at least finite. MHO obviously. Also I wonder how imminent FDA approval may be, otherwise the American and UK arms of the trial will be a long way out of step.

Iceman you say 'Why would these drug companies pay for all the cost if they thought it was useless.' What drug companies? What payment?

Look forward to it botski. Trust you didn't sit next to the asthmatic bloke with the tickly cough and a huge bag of crisps. The bb owes you an enduring debt of gratitude for the many recordings over the years.

Agreed WF. I think Knowlesi is getting a but stuck in a past of his own creation. Today's rns is excellent. Let's hope there's more to come in due course.

You're right Inanco as I posted the other day TF just reads something without making any effort to understand it, the regurgitates it as he thinks he wanted to read it. This has caused a lot of trouble and bad feeling over the last however long.

Sorry. I knew what you meant - just me being techie. Or tetchy. Or both. Or neither. I'll get my coat....

Ruck - 'everyone is getting a little techy.' And tetchy too. Both actually apply equally well.

Or 10 million new shares at 100p.... Ah well, one can but hope!

Exactly the same here January. Money waiting, but need convincing. I will be very keen to see what logansrun has to say.

If it wasn't against LSE rules to mention trades on other sites, then we might be aware of other possible buys. But since it isn't allowed to mention such things here, I won't.

An interesting example of the TF school of interpretation as so often pointed out to TF much to his indignation - I know it is only centred on the 'doing lines for the headmaster', so light-hearted, but I posted - 'I'll get the 100 lines in before assembly tomorrow.'
The suggestion of a trillion lines was made shortly afterwards by TF himself, and although I didn't post in response to that, within a short space of time we have the headmaster saying '...I like it ! AND RW volunteered after all !'
No TF, I didn't. You might have got that from the bottom of a glass, but not from my posts.
As I said the other day, you read a post, take the bones out of it, rebuild it as you want to read it, and then post your adapted version as if it were the original. The only refreshing change is that you are doing it to my post, not standing in wait over C7's posts to the exclusion of all others. Now this isn't worth a 'hands on hips, tapping foot demanding an apology' string of further headmaster posts, I'll leave the comment as is and not be coming back to it, but it does serve to illustrate the source of a lot of C7's frustrations with being misquoted and then attacked when he correctly takes issue with it.

Ooh, sherbet lemons. Love you long time big boy.

Thanks Ray. I'll reciprocate by doing your geography homework next week. And I'll share my flying saucers from the tuck shop with you.