Member Info for ratcliffewriter

I'll send you mine. They'd need turning inside out, but any port in a storm.

My small, short-haired Jack Russell is getting worried too...

At least you have Andrex C7 - poorer quality paper can leave you just going through the motions.

Here's one to ponder while isolating - coronavirus or being stuck for a month on a desert island with TF? Bring on the virus, at least it is only a temporary irritation.

Same idea as the saying in aviation - 'you can land anywhere once.'

You probably can actually, but only the once... Gordon's is a safer bet.

A litre of Gordon's gin is 16 quid in my local Morrison's. Other supermarkets and alcoholic beverages are available.

Don't forget he is a man who can own a casino in Atlantic City and make it go bust. Takes a special kind of genius to do that.

I favour the Italian 'lock down' system. They really ought to lock down Liverpool. Not because of the corona virus, just for crime prevention really.

It's easy to make toilet paper go further - use both sides.

A good illustration of what goes on in this madhouse from teasybear - joined LSE today and has posted a ramping comment about one share on no less than 32 different boards as diverse as pharmaceuticals and oil in a matter of minutes. Dishonest or trustworthy? DYOR, as they say.

Let's get this straight - TF has spent the whole morning trying to cast doubt on C7's totals, gone round the houses (missing out NEX) and come back to the conclusion that C7 was actually right all along. So what's TF playing at? C7 has posted totals for the last few years and I think can be trusted to get them right, or at least not leave out the blindingly obvious NEX platform which can account for a significant proportion of trades most days. I can only assume TF is feeling left out now that the prime object of his pedantry and nit-picking C7 has filtered him, and can't be subjected to the daily sniping and undermining as before. Just IMO, naturally. Maybe next time TF does any maths he should take his socks off to help adding up, rather than trying to do it in his head. Talk about 'mental' arithmetic!

Perfectly called again, Mr crystal balls!

Even a couple of hundred pounds' worth. Maybe we will actually go north of 7p once more !

for 200k.
Just thought I'd post that so the header is updated.

I can't read much at the moment, my eyesight is a bit fuzzy after half a bottle of Domestos. Of course if it works as advertised I shall be 'clean round the bend.'

Knowlesi I won't dissect your rather hysterical and characteristically abusive 20.53 post, suffice to say it is wrong in pretty much all aspects, and in any event you could only be shooting in the dark unless you were my stockbroker (you aren't) or had access to my facebook details (difficult as I am not on Facebook) or had some insight into my private life, and you don't. Some very interesting discussion this evening from others, but nobody touches on the paradox of having a buy-in point on what they dismiss as a 'lifestyle' company because surely any sensible investor would avoid one of those like the plague, and if I felt scancell had become one such I would sell out and leave, as I would have thought you would if genuinely holding that opinion. Just can't understand why you bother lambasting a dead duck if that's how you see it.

Mind you, I seem to remember one poster saying he was going to buy in at 3p. I suppose he must be feeling pretty sore now and wondering how to deramp this one. What was his name? No - don't tell me, It'll come to me some time I'm sure.

How do you square that rather heavy allegation with David Evans' recent purchase of 70 grands' worth of shares? Wouldn't he have a better insight into the general running of the company than even your profound wisdom and judgement K?

Agreed - nice to see a move upwards again. Some interesting links recently posted helpfully by others too, shows that the company is getting properly stuck into developing the science and in the right places as well it seems.