Member Info for Rambo23

Alwayshopping all fair comment I just wanted sight of the examples you were referencing. Thanks

alwayshoping - can you explain further your comment thanks.

'They dont have to look very far to discover that he doesnt actually set a very good example, and therefore they could be asking themselves the question "is this guy to be trusted ?"

Not with questions like ' What do you think of the UJO share price' What a complete waste of time asking about another company when we have plenty of topics to ask about.

Mara up over 40% yesterday along with other crypto stocks by similar amounts. This is going to fly today.

Sorry 2 weeks plus 1 day perhaps not then

And in 2 weeks the GM will be concluded and outcome of warrants....coincidence?

Chrishutch - I was able to buy 250k on my first attempt but not seen more than a few trades before it go through on L2 either

Toplpadermike I notice we have ordinary and special resolutions. I believe the special resolutions need 75% and ordinary need a majority. Happy to be corrected if someone can confirm this as it will make a difference to the outcome.

Surely this will likely depend on which way GC votes. We need confirmation he won’t change his mind to vote against this. If he votes against surely this will get blocked. Still suspicious why it’s taken a month to post this RNS for the meeting...stinks!

Novice20 - that’s a fair point you make about the dilution but on a positive some large holders on here have also stated they have increased their holdings as well. Hopefully Jonathan can provide an updated view on the current state of play that he is aware of.

Did anyone see Jonathan Halls Twitter post this afternoon - ‘ More RMS warrants and options issued today. Probably looking to maximise votes in favour of the warrant issue...’

I find this slightly odd. If I have understood correctly he has had communication with some on this board ( I haven’t) and he has been helping them with regards to registering their votes against the warrants and therefore knows the count. The feedback if I have again understood correctly is that 25% of shareholders need to vote down the warrants and with Gareth’s stake and other holders here that 25% criteria has been indicatively met already. Therefore why has Jonathan even bothered to write the statement when he has full visibility of over 25% of shareholders registering their votes against the warrants and therefore our expectation is they won’t happen. I’m concerned about the continued delay to this vote here and no transparency. As per my post the other day this is a cloud over us we don’t need at a critical time but does deserve a full explanation. I would also like GC to reconfirm his intention to vote against any warrant vote since his RNS comments as we are basing the vote count assuming he votes it down but we have no idea if a deal has been done to get him onside or not. This whole issue stinks and we should just be focused on making masks not shoddy governance. If anyone has had recent comms with Jonathan on this topic please can you update us. Thanks

Persi you misunderstood my point. I wasn’t suggesting a fire sale at all. I was highlighting that given the news in the RNS it seems to suggest bigger plans for sites A & B are being prioritised over establishing sites C & D ie why bother incurring all the time and financial cost for C & D if you don’t need to. Getting the planning apps for A & B additional wells submitted and in parallel do the EWT on them both elements tick more boxes to satisfy any potential buyer than C & D at this point.

Does anyone have a realistic view on the MRHA timelines?

Thanks Miker444 - The other consideration that comes to mind here is if they think sites C&D will take a lot more money and time they could reduce that by focusing on developing sites A and B first knowing the hydrocarbons are in the ground. Sites C&D would carry more risk and likely take longer to prove up the resource. That is my read on todays RNS. prove up faster then flog it.

Mr Gamble - perhaps but that is speculation. I'm mere highlighting the facts and the recent form collectively has been beyond disappointing and I'm sure has cost a lot of people a lot of money.

shambles comes to mind another RNS with some negative news to water down the good news and still no clarity on the shareholder meeting another bump to overcome. Great to have the certification but useless without a working machine to make them to sell. Why were the parts not on the original lorry in the first place? when was this known about and why hasn't this been sorted already? This type of thing simple erodes the trust in the managements ability to run operation. Feels like one step forward and two back. They need to prove themselves with decent orders now.

Deemule totally agree and today’s RNS is just for WNA so in time they could do the same for WNB as well potentially where they found even more hydrocarbons. I see this as very positive as some had queried WNA for a long time. I would still like to see better comms on Parta, Cali and WN timelines as I feel it’s fallen short the last few months.

Anyone have any timeframes to get the WNA expanded planning completed?

In my view to move on from the awful comms and director deals and arrangements we need absolute clarity on the warrant and placing concerns. Until the vote takes place it is another cloud of doubt loitering. If it’s a min 2 weeks notice required before the meeting it makes no sense to delay this whilst we continue to debate the agenda here and in turn impacts investor confidence and the SP right at a time we expect positive RNS not like the rubbish this am. How many negative RNS can a company issue in just a few weeks!

As a holder I want further clarity what has actually been agreed as part of the placing, what is enforceable and what can be voted down. Ie if the warrants are voted down what if any are the impacts on the deal made with the placing investors? The continued delay on this issue concerns me as it should have been dealt with already. A higher SP makes little difference as shareholders won’t vote for dilution under the circumstances even if at 5, 7, 10p so what’s the issue here? Lastly do they actually need £5m and what’s it going to be used for? Comms are falling well short. I genuinely hope this all blows over, there are no further issues and we move higher

Lv2 currently 100-104. Only showing 5k @104 then 3k@110 then 5k@113.....limited liquidity any positive news and this will fly! Just opened a position

It's worth revisiting this link which someone else kindly provided a while ago and specifically looking at the Abingdon Health awarded tenders...over £170m in the last few months relating to testing, LFDs etc. Hopefully positive news will come soon.

https://bidstats.uk/tenders/?q=antibody§or=health#743374847-740688122-26