Member Info for Quady

Addicknt do you think they are talking to the main stakeholders.

This is insulting, but worrying at the same time.

They think 26 pence is a fair offer.

I really don't understand where we go from here.

If they offer 10 or 20 percent more, do they honestly think Solgold would recommend this to shareholders.

Good grief Pbow.

The offer was rejected, because as I have been saying for years, we can defend.

Don't forget we need a majority to accept this offer .

To be honest , they must have known it would be rejected.

So something happening in the background.

I doubt they have even approached the major holder's to find out if they would sell their holdings for 26 pence.

But as always I am honest.

I am surprised at this.

Thank you BlueToff.

Agreed Brad, should have got out at 46 pence but I didn't because I believe in the long term company that Solgold will become .

I do believe we will become a leading company that will provide the world's commodities that it so badly needs.

I invested in Solgold in 2013 after being on this forum for around a year.

I bought into Solgold because of climate change.

I still hold Solgold because of climate change.

One thing I am uncertain of is how far the copper price will rise.

In one hand the fact the world has limited choice will drive it higher.

On the other hand, as the price rises, downward pressure will be applied, because of the commercial costs of the products that copper require.

No way slug has children.

No woman would go near him.

Thank you Zoros, as I said there are decent people on here.

But so many who support Slug's vile views and attack me.

I was lucky as I was a teenager during the ascention of Margaret Thatcher.

I am one of lifes natural observers and problem solvers.

I started investing in 1980.

I observed the world and saw the problems.

So bought oil and gas and property companies.

The time was insane, people lost lots of money, and people made lots of money.

I was in the second category and when I look back, it wasn't skill in the early days.

It was luck.

But I was learning fast and so were my friends, we drove each other on and the chat down the pub was always finance related.

Not one of us worked in finance at the time.

We were truly Thatcher's children.

I observed the property market, the oil and gas industry and made money.

I got in at the dot-com boom and got out, and chose the right companies.

I did the same in 1985 with the advent of mobile phones.

They were crazy times.

Today I am in renewables, green energy and climate change companies.

Not made much money yet, but will as the world changes.

I am not invested in AI yet as cannot see the direction the successful companies will take.

But still looking at them.

Those that don't understand the world and cannot spot the solutions will not make money.

Those that can will.

Yes sounds arrogant, but when you live it, it's not.

Look at the changing world and look at the industry's that are going to become vital for the survival of humanity.

You won't go far wrong.

And it's not just about how we get our power.

I agree addicknt it was a titish thing to say.

However true it is.

Remember I am the only individual on here who published my Solgold buys and people them observed them coming through on level 2.

I bought 1.8 million shares over a period of time.

Today only own 1.2 million.

People have to take my word on the 1.2 million figure as never posted my sells.

I do get fed up with the ridiculous poster's on here who just feed off each other.

That no way to build a portfolio.

However I don't include you or Pbow and a few others in that description.

Addicknt, I started investing at age 19 with £25

Over the years I added around another £5,000

Today I have over 2 million in investments.

There may be some more successful investors on here.

But haven't seen any from the content they publish.

Pbow I respect you have knowledge I don't.

You raise questions I can't answer.

But I am probably the most skilled investor on here.

And make money from being right.

Have done all my life.

The situation is whoever is right in this current scenario, we make money.

It's just a question on the timescale.

However I leave you with a thought.

Someone is going to construct Cascabel.

Even BHP would buy in the expertise.

As they don't have mine building teams on their books.

They use civil engineering companies.

We can build this and I believe we will.

No I don't use AI all the time, that is a lie perpertated by slug.

Too many people are taken in by him, didn't think you where one of them.

The reason we can take this to production is the sheer scale of the project.

This will be staged, and so I believe will the finance.

This doesn't start off massive.

It starts off as an open cut, and yes Gmining can absolutely deliver.

Of course it needs to deliver in a way that supports further development's within Cascabel, right up to a full scale block cave operation.

It will take decade's, but as an engineer (problem solver).

I understand how tasks on large scale projects are broken down and slowly put together.

This is nothing compared to Eurotunnel, and the companies employed had never done anything like it before and that was decades ago.

As you will know Pbow, while block cave carrys more risk, it not impossible like some people on here will have us believe.

Could we be bid for.

Of course we could, but the evidence suggests not.

I have held this belief , before AI was available to the public.

I don't need to use it, but now and again do to understand where slug gets his nonsense from.

Pbow like you I listen to what the company says.

I rarely use AI, but sometimes a useful check, even though I need to check it, as doesn't always return the right results, because the question doesn't have enough details.

So I ask AI for its reference material.

Of course we can go to construction with an open cut decline, of course we can raise the funding.

Not me saying this.

It's the company's line.

Gmining can project manage this and supply the skills for open cut and block cave.

We are however awaiting further updates on Solgolds statement that we have interested parties in ExploreCo.

Not AI generated, but announcement from Solgold.

I believe you when you say you have experience, as you're not one of the nutter's on here, and your posts are factual.

However please don't accuse me of not being informed.

I am probably the poster on here who has called this right the most.

I understand investing and understood from early days that we were very unlikely to be bid for unless we were distressed, which we would get unfavorable terms.

Today we are not distressed and can finance Cascabel, which means an offer is less likely not more likely, because of the diverse book.

Pbow the interview you posted is around a year old.

You're clutching at straws.

A lot has happened since.

Good morning addicknt, I believe you maybe right.

After all the company has communicated what is happening many times.

We have been informed more than once that we have interest in ExploreCo.

We have also had it communicated that no one is making an offer for Cascabel.

We have also had it communicated that we are going to production.

We have also had it communicated that we are not mine builder's, so as I have said many years ago, we will buy in the expertise, which is exactly what we have done.

Where slug has said this is either lies from the company or it's impossible.

Then again he has a record of being 100% wrong on everything.

He's such an Imbecile he thinks the UK is going to have a revolution.

He thinks climate change is not real .

And we are meant to believe he is a Christian, when he is an open rac.ist and truly hates women.

So I suspect this is about ExploreCo.

As sometimes happens, we can agree to disagree.

Looks like the SP is rising because of the news of Tandy bootstrapping Cascabel.

People are now confident we are going to construction.

I ran a few AI enquiries to ask why the recent rise in the Solgold share price and it seems the biggest change is the market believes we are going to construction and will be producing in 2028/2029.

Interesting only twenty minutes in but our share price is holding up.

Could we be 30 pence by close of business on Friday.

I wouldn't bet against it.

By the way addicknt.

The worst chancellor of our lifetime was Gordon Brown who single handed destroyed pensions in this country with the abolition of ACT and the introduction of FRS17.

Good grief addicknt what were you watching.

Kemi Badonoch was out of her depth and didn't understand what had happened.

We as a country are bust.

Whoever got to give this budget was going to raise taxes.

This was good.

Now all the criticism today seems to be on not cutting benefits.

However the people making that criticism haven't read the details.

We are going to see a reduction real time in the DWP budget.

Remember that pensions are the biggest part of this.

I believe we will soon see legislation forcing the under 25's into work because of the changes made yesterday.

I agree addicknt, but she must have known the shortfall when she made that speech.

She indicated that income tax would rise, without saying income tax would rise.

I believe it was a trap for kemi Badonoch.

MadPunter you are mad and unable to understand the simplist statement.

I am not of the left.

I am slightly to the right of centre.

Although I seriously doubt you know what that means.

I don't reckon she did change her budget.

I believe that the doom was leaked and never correct, so we were left wrong footed when it was announced.

40% of the extra money accounts for the extra headroom, so along with that, the electric prices have had some of the extra cost moved to general taxation and rail fares frozen.

Both these measures will have downward pressure on inflation and will underpin money supply, leading to downward pressure on interest rates.

Some of this stuff is really well thought out.