Member Info for Quady

I agree with you on the retail buyers addicknt.

And on that point, I believe we should see the share price improve.

How much is always the question.

Sorry addicknt I have to disagree.

The CIPA will of course be good news.

However it doesn't alter the distribution of shares among the major holders.

That's what would be game changing.

However it is another footstep towards construction next year.

Good evening NotMuchMoney.

Insults are what DBW does.

He is snidey and totally supports his friend slug on everything he posts.

This poster is snidey.

Slug you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with Jimmy Saville.

You seem to have him in your thoughts constantly.

Doesn't surprise me, as you are a nasty piece of work.

Pbow Again you are twisting what I said.

That's nuts.

Yes go the whole hog for the Tandy start up.

We have hydro coming on for block cave operation.

That has always been the case.

The reason I said go the whole hog for Tandy was storage is a fraction of what it costs on an industrial scale.

You really know nothing about this subject.

I will still read your posts on Solgold, as you are one of the better poster's on here.

But please stop misrepresenting what I actually say.

Pbow I never said solar would be the primary source of power for Cascabel.

I said it could be used as a start up.

Industry all over the world is doing this.

We have working models.

Out of all economists I have read about Adam Smith and his life the most.

You cannot read Smith without understanding his thinking and motivation.

Pbow, I know you know nothing about Adam Smith and the birth of capitalism.

Adam Smith had a good friend called David Hume, who invited Jean Jacques Rousseau to the UK.

He arranged his trip.

Although Adam Smith never met Rousseau, his writing was greatly influenced by Rousseau.

To not understand that Western democracies around the world, largely base their legal structures on Rousseau makes me wonder about your understanding.

Another hero of mine is Thonas Paine who was also heavily influenced by Rousseau.

Today imbeciles like slug would call the father of capitalism woke.

Capitalism today is totally corrupted and this is why I am an old fashion capitalist and not a socialist.

I thought you would understand the difference.

Lastly Magna Carta, was the founding of an all encompassing body of ancient law in the UK.

Today the writing of Rousseau and other great thinkers have had more input into the UK than Magna Carta.

Ridiculous post Pbow, you have read none of this stuff.

Pbow, you certainly don't know Adam Smith's life story.

I have used AI to pull this information.

Adam Smith and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were prominent Enlightenment thinkers who shared an interest in commercial society but came to different conclusions about it. While Rousseau is often seen as a critic of modern commercial society and Smith as its advocate, a closer look reveals Smith's concerns mirrored Rousseau's, and he responded pragmatically to Rousseau's critique in his own work. Both explored shared themes such as sympathy, inequality, and human nature, though with differing perspectives.

Also you accuse me of just stringing together people.

Not true, I gave Freddrich Hayek as understanding a strong body of law was required to have a more open and free market.

Yes you're correct Pbow.

It was liberalism.

Adam Smith is often referred to the father of capitalism.

However Adam Smith, was against rich individuals and believed in a strong body of law and regulations in a free market.

Much like Freddrich Hayek later argues.

I do know my history.

Adam Smith took Rousseau's work and understood that a free market economy was based on an inclusive society and within a strong body of law.

If you know your history then you will know that capitalism comes from the left.

It's fascism that comes from the right and has corrupted capitalism.

Remember that the French revolution was from the left and from the ideas of Jean Jacques Rousseau.

Which also gave the UK it's body of law.

Capitalism is the creation of wealth, however it was corrupted by far right facism.

It was the striping away of regulation in the pretense of freer markets.

It allowed market abuse and created divided societies.

A return to true capitalism with probaty and checks is what is required.

Problem is nobody knows how to do it, with the level of debt in the western world.

Slug the reason he never responded is anyone seeing your email saying net zero is BS is obviously a nutter, why would he respond to a nutter.

Thank you Rodney, I will take a look later this afternoon, as seeing friends this morning.

Good morning Rodney, could you please post Stas20's calculation, I would like to understand his methodology.

Even if you take 100% of the NPV which you cannot apply to NAV.

It still cannot make £1.64

BBG what are you on about.

The DFS isn't due till end of second quarter 2026 and that's Solgolds timeline, so probably going to slip a bit.

Pbow not only you cannot use NPV as NAV.

But you cannot use any part of NPV to calculate NAV.

They are two totally different measurements.

It's like saying I have 0.06 Bananas and 5.4 billion oranges.

That means I have 1.64 billion bananas.

No you don't, you still only have 0.06 Bananas.

I know the difference and so does every article printed on Solgold.

That's why people on here want an updated NAV aren't going to get one, as there is nothing to update on the net asset value.

All updates have been on the net potential value, which is the value of Cascabel.

Not even Porvenir, because we don't have a NPV figure for anything else but Cascabel.

You may not like arguing with accountants, but they do the accounting..

And by the way I am not an accountant.

I used to work as a broker and as a trainee actuary.

I do know the difference and so do the financial articles printed.

Thank you BP1234.

This article shows the NPV to be 5.4 billion dollars.

Not the NAV.

I have been saying this for ages.

People on here don't have a clue, when they cannot differentiate between NAV and NPV.

Good afternoon addicknt.

If they are holding as nominees that's ok.

My thoughts are they might be building a position to sell at agreed price to a block holder, so avoiding declaring by stealth.

This is an area I am unsure of.

Can someone do that and not fall foul of regulation.

The good news is the share price is not falling apart back, we are slowly getting a momentum.

Just need news on funding and final licensing.

So China sends top politicians, scientists and engineers and you say it's nothing, they are ahead in their climate targets agreed under the Paris accord.

Trump never sent anyone and American scientist's are leaving and coming to the UK and Europe, because they can see the future.