Personnally29 Dec 2018 11:22
I see the fact that the attackers made the statement that anything FRR say without a Nomad should be classed as a lie, a panic by shorters.
The Email with BP was stumbled upon.
Everyone knows already that only info that should 100% be relied on is RNS
We also know that communication is limited without a Nomad.
If FRR do give any info, like Loan agreed, BP signed MOU and anything else positive, those attackers will dismiss that info, which they preempted.
Why?
Because if we get positive news over next week, then a nomad the week or so after, the SP will rerate. However if any news in between is ignored, then the attackers would hope that the SP will rise slower and so they have time to get out.
The SP is suspended. UNTIL A NEW NOMAD
Any news FRR do give out may reassure people, but not effect SP as no one can trade, so ask your self why are they worried what a non trading company may or may not say whilst suspended?
The only reason they could possibly worry about it is because they believe it would have an effect.
To have an effect they must believe FRR will trade again
Which means FRR will have a new Nomad to do so.
I see that vey statement that FRR could give any info they want and should be ignored as a massive positive.
The only reason is because they are worried due to above, as if not FRR statements are meaningless if never traded again.
I suggest strongly that shorters are worried
I have been in a number of companies that closed for ever on Aim, TXO. MTV etc
When they suspended and later delisted there was no attack like this, the attack is due to anxiety by those who may lose a fortune
IMHO