RE: RP RNS30 Jun 2020 13:46
Thanks David and all the other people who have commented. Clive it's a good point about the loss of Woodford causing instability but having said that, I'm glad to see the back of him, it's one of the reasons our SP is so low. The wide spread may deter profit takers, but it also deters new investors getting in as they end up with a significant loss just by buying the shares.
13 years have passed since I got in and we are now at 20% of the SP. I completely agree that the science is unbelievable (as is the fact that this hasn't been recognised). There's a danger we'll end up getting bought out by a large pharma for peanuts and all this will have been a waste of time. Most holders would probably take double the current SP but that is actually nothing when you look at the licencing agreements and IP collected over the years.
Michael Hunt has impressed me more with his recent upbeat presentations, but they are still almost completely scientific, which isn't really what you expect from a CFO. I think the market needs some commercial confidence and clear deadlines. The clinical trials never seem to end or get passed Phase 2. Having said all that, this company has got some amazing potential which is why I have stuck it out so long.