Member Info for ProfitSniffer

Which data provider do you use? Tick size is 0.1, spread is a percentage is defined as ask-bid into ask (x100)

So at present levels, the closest it could have been is 100*((2.8-2.7)/2.8) which is 3.6%

Could you have glanced at something else in error? Or is your software faulty?

Indeed Monte, just a pity it didn't stay in the 18s. Let's see what this afternoon brings, could be interesting

Australia (that other famous lockdown commy Covid state) gives us a UK style rebuttal of the facts. I am utterly fascinated by these deep flaws in the tools mankind is using as Gospel nowadays (though I previously said that all these AI tools are rubbish programmed by woke morons)

The Perth Server says..

The "David Lammy blue cheese mastermind" reference comes from a widely circulated, satirical social media post claiming he made several factual errors during an appearance on Celebrity Mastermind, including confusing blue cheese with Red Leicester and incorrectly stating Marie Antoinette was a Nobel Prize-winning scientist. While he did appear on the show, the specific errors mentioned, such as the ones about blue cheese, have been fabricated for comedic effect and are not in the actual transcript of his appearance.

Origin of the claim: The claims originated on social media, where users shared them in a humorous and critical context, likely mocking political figures.

Actual Mastermind appearance: David Lammy did compete on Celebrity Mastermind in 2009 and finished with a low score of 13 points.

Satirical nature: The stories about him mixing up blue cheese, Red Leicester, and Marie Antoinette are satirical and have been widely circulated as jokes, rather than factual accounts of his performance on the show

Canada, which I thought might be "pro Commy Lammy" has this version

David Lammy's "blue cheese mastermind" connection stems from a memorable and widely-mocked 2009 appearance on Celebrity Mastermind. During his turn, Lammy incorrectly answered several questions, including that Red Leicester is a type of blue cheese, a fact that was widely reported and became a source of online commentary.

The event: Lammy appeared on Celebrity Mastermind in 2009, scoring 13 points.

The incorrect answers: He famously stated that Red Leicester is a blue cheese, that Henry VIII was succeeded by Henry VII, and that Marie Antoinette was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics.

The reaction: The performance was considered unfortunate and the incorrect answers have been the subject of jokes and online discussions, particularly in light of his later political career.

So I then switched my VPN from a UK Server to a USA server and asked the same question, and this is the answer I then got

David Lammy's appearance on Mastermind included a mistake where he incorrectly identified "blue cheese" as a category that includes Red Leicester and stated that Marie Antoinette was a Nobel Prize-winning French scientist. There is also a claim that he said Henry VII succeeded Henry VIII, which is historically inaccurate.

Blue cheese: Lammy confused categories by incorrectly labeling Red Leicester as a type of blue cheese that pairs with port.

Marie Antoinette: He incorrectly claimed that Marie Antoinette was a Nobel Prize-winning French scientist.

Henry VII and VIII: There is also a claim that he stated Henry VII succeeded Henry VIII, which is factually incorrect as Henry VII preceded Henry VIII.

For those who haven't seen David Lammy embarrassing himself on Mastermind, the clip is here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsR4Nx-ELgc

So I asked Google AI, "David Lammy Mastermind Blue Cheese" and this is what i got back

David Lammy did not appear on Mastermind and make a claim about blue cheese; the idea is a false claim spread online, likely from a Facebook group, in a sarcastic post about his political appointments. The post falsely claimed he said that Red Leicester was a blue cheese, alongside other inaccuracies about Marie Antoinette being a Nobel Prize-winning scientist and Henry VII succeeding Henry VIII.

The claim is false: There is no evidence David Lammy was on the show Mastermind and made these specific comments.

The source is unreliable: The claims originate from social media posts on sites like Facebook and Facebook, where the information was shared in a satirical context.

Background: The posts were created in reaction to his political appointments, including serving as the Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary since September 2025.

No it hasn't been 2%, if you check the Instrument Parameters (MIT401 specification XLON MIT 401) for GSCU you will see that the Static Price Format Schedule parameter is TM_12 (Description One Tenth, value 0.1)

That means the tick size for this stock is 0.1p. So if the Bid is 2.7p the ask must be at least 2.8p outside of auction, so the minimum spread is 3.7% at these prices.

At knocking on for a million quid a trade? Institutional buyers for sure. And for each one of these buying in, we are losing PI trades which is a combination of those just crystallising profits and those selling out on the dips.

They are dipping it each day and collecting shares to move on to the Institutions. As they do this, the free flow becomes less and less.

Those holding tight will see a massive rerate at some point.

If anyone else had L2 you will have seen what happened.

We had a 4.5m bid at 17.22

We had a 5m bid at 18.00

We had a seller for 5m at "market" (= closing price)

After 4:45 of the 5mins auction, the settlement was live at 18p but with seconds left they pulled it so the market now settled at 17.22 instead. The seller was bummed basically, in a very sly move. That said, they were willing to offer 18p for 5m and just saw an error and took advantage.

Institutional buyers, see below. They were willing to pay 18p for 5m as well

Spread is wider than Katy Price at a limbo party

4.5m on the bid at 17.22

5m on the bid at 18 but no sellers to satisfy

9m cleared at 17.22. Will open up and surge past 18 first thing tomorrow

Your existence doesn't help any way. Twat

As you wish. What is your understanding of the part of your comment ringed in orange?

https://ibb.co/TM3BynwY

The king of reverse ferreting accusing others of the same. I'm not pretending I said anything else, I used the word species to describe the people of Toxteth to imply that they are not human, I can't help that you're too stupid to get the subtle context. Would some English lessons help you out?

Are you ready yet to admit that you thought BHP wanted 59.5% of ENSA from us when in fact they wanted 70%. Because you said it (I can bring up the post if you want me to) then tried to imply that you said something else.

Derogatory to the people of Toxteth. Do you need someone to put your shoes on and tie your laces for you? How do you even get through a day being so achingly dumb?!

Anyway let's not ruin the chat board for others, Solgold has some key milestones and events coming up between now and Christmas. There will be much to analyse for those of us who are actually invested.

Sliding down to my target zone for another trade.

Clearly too stupid to understand that the term was used in a derogatory context then...

One of a dying breed being drowned out by vastly inferior imposters sadly. Christian, Highly educated, Free-thinking, Straight, Honest, Hard working, Patriotic Proper Brit (White + many generations of living in this country and being proud of it)

What I mean it is they're more likely to shoplift in Aldi than shop at John Lewis. It's not an affluent area, and has a high crime rate (which of course is totally unsurprising given the previous statistic)