Member Info for ProfitSniffer

The classic Quady reverse ferret.

1. Make a stupid statement that he can't back up

2. Get challenged on it

3. Hurl insults and slurs around whilst trying to reaffirm it

4. Get challenged again

5. Begin the reverse ferret, which is usually a combined attack of deflection onto other topics and further insults

6. Get asked for evidence

7. Roll out the tired mantra of insults and allegations against others

8. Switch tack to trying to argue about the semantics of the comment rather than its content.

I haven't denied that the company announced a Strategic Review, I have alleged that the process does not exist and is merely a ruse for the multitude of reasons I have laid out within this thread. I asked you to show us when the company recently said the Strategic Review is open-ended and still under way, as you had alleged that they constantly communicate this. You cannot provide a single example.

Therefore you are a lair, QED (Quody Erat Demonstrantum)

In that case, unless you can prove otherwise, I shall assume that your statement that the company has communicated recently that the Strategic Review is open-ended and ongoing is simply misinformation being released by yourself to feed your own ego and agenda.

Please refrain from soiling the forum with further lies and deliberate misinformation.

Agree with HFM, it was all about the waiting game having picked up the pieces from the Cazzubo debacle.

Quady, do you or do you not have an example of Solgold recently saying the SR is open ended and on-going? NMM couldn't find mention the 2025 Annual report, and I read all RNS's and try to tune into as many videos/presentations as I can and I cannot recall the SR even being mentioned recently.

I can of course set my scripts away to read all the RNS's and list which ones mention the SR explicitly if you want me to? But I thought that you might appreciate the opportunity to back up your bluster with evidence for once in your life so in order that we can give you a modicum of credibility?

NMM possibly, but I have a different view. The monumental mess left by Cazzubo left the company in such crisis that they had rub dirt in our eyes and pretend they had irons in fires while they went about cleaning up the disaster that he steered us into. And I also allege he did that as a BHP stooge (as I said the moment he was hired when everyone else was waxing that we'd signed up the new Lionel Messi as they always do)

He tried to ruin Solgold for BHP to pick up the ashes, he very nearly succeeded.

Quady, I haven't asked you for any concrete evidence that you've listed in your weird diatribe. I have asked can you give us an example of when the company recently said that the Strategic Review is open ended and ongoing.

If I knew how to find it for myself I would do so, but I am saying I don't recall such a communication so I'd be grateful if you could either back up or retract what you have said.

Quady, what I posted was from the RNS on 7th October 2022. Listen to what the company says.

No company would take over three years to review their strategy because the parameters would have moved many times within that timeframe and a strategy would be pointless. You tell us that every time the Strategic Review is mentioned, they have said it is open ended and ongoing. Can you provide us with a concrete example of such a communication?

I don't recall it even being mentioned for a long time

It actually commenced well over three years ago, and this is what we were told at the time

SolGold is pursuing a strategic review process with the goal of maximizing value for all shareholders (the "Strategic Review Process"). Accordingly, SolGold has appointed Citigroup Global Markets Inc. ("Citi") and Maxit Capital LP ("Maxit Capital") to act as financial advisors to assist with exploring value creating alternatives for the Combined Group. The Strategic Review Process may include, but shall not be limited to, evaluating and pursuing the following:

· evaluating financing alternatives for the Combined Group;

· a spin-out of assets, other than the Cascabel Project, to all shareholders of the Combined Group;

· the direct or indirect acquisition of an interest in ENSA and/or the Cascabel Project howsoever effected; or

· any other transaction or series of related transactions as may be agreed to between the Parties

How can it take three years to "review" each of those options and report back to shareholders on the findings of the review team?

If you know how to read an RNS properly, and we all know that Quady doesn't, it is simply saying the goal is still so sell the project any which way we can. That hasn't happened in three years, does that mean the review is ongoing?

Of course not, the review is simply the goals of the board and always was. There is no "result" of the review or feedback. It is a process that does not exist

The strategic review WAS a smokescreen! Plain and simple. Nothing ever came of it, it never existed

I'm tempted, it's coming into my range for another long. Still has the same massive upside potential

Good grief padmaster, don't you know anything about diverse books?!

Need I say more

It'll fail because it's a strong technical resistance level as well as a psychological boundary. Attempt 3 will be telling

Consolidating for a second pop at 20p which will fail but not as spectacular a bounce off as this morning. Bid strength needs to ramp up first before attempt #2 is likely.

There's the US government shutdown as well, that can't be helping

Immigration is down to almost zero in the US because Trump has implemented actual border control policies instead of the spastics we have in this country with their fingers in their ears saying diversity is our strength as seafaring invaders rape, stab, kill and rob our people in their ever increasing droves.

They hate Trump because he is right and demonstrably right and their ideology is wrong, and ruinously wrong. Mass immigration cannot ever work.

Keep in mind by the way, that this an organisation with 60 people at a cost of over £3m per annum to the tax payer who form a service they call "BBC Verify" which is meant to be the final voice and moral arbiter on what is truth and lies. And yet somehow, just somehow, they managed to let slip the falsification of a speech made by somebody who they really don't like.

People are not as stupid as the BBC think they are. Mass withdrawal of licence fees will ensure IMO which the out of touch government will respond to by replacing funding from general taxation. Our government and its public sector institutions hate us and think we are there to serve them. The gloves must come off now.

There are left wing voices still trying to defend the BBC on this. It is beyond incredible

It's like a woman being cheated on and lied to by her husband and still believing them that it's all nonsense and everyone else must be lying.

There are some epically stupid people who will still believe the BBC no matter what Quadswollop they broadcast, but surely a lot of people are now going to start questioning just what they've been fed by the state propaganda arm. They are literally victims of a Soviet style pysops and had no idea it was happening to them (despite those of us who saw through it clearly explaining it to them over and over)

Ideally we need him to fall out with the yellow rubber faced tyrant as well....get the gold price back up

Correct soupdragon, mine are also listed with the amount requested but nil value at present. If old share dog checks her account she will see its nil value at present and will be sorted/reimbursed following settlement. Usually surplus subscriptions are totally even and the placing is underwritten anyway so in the unlikely event our excess requests don't fill the raise, the underwriter will.

I would expect a drop will into the .20s ahead of transfer day, any announcement notwithstanding of course! FDA approval may be very near.

You'd have to be a sandwich short of a picnic to say the BBC is right leaning in any way on anything, it's simply not true. In fact one of the reasons Davie has gone is concerns about the beeb's left leaning bias which is institutional. Like many publicly funded organisations, they have filled themselves with people who align to the left wing narratives they push.

Where are the BBC articles on any of the following?

Climate change is a scam

Covid vaccines are dangerous and unnecessary

Diversity is destroying the UK

Islam is destroying the UK

White sportsmen setting up scholarships for white students only (like Lewis Hamilton did for blacks)

The NHS is an expensive, horrendously bad service that needs total reform

There are only two gender, male and female

Add into this their total obsessions with ethnic minorities, disabled people, queers and trans and you have a blob whose sole purpose is to push hard left narrative. And the worst part of it is, they do this with taxpayer's money.

They ousted Truss and Johnson let leave Thieves and Stalin alone for far, far worse incidents.

A full investigation is required. Now it's in black and white and beyond any shadow of a doubt that they lie deliberately to serve their own agenda, we need to uncover which other lies that have sold to very stupid people (like you) who have then used those politically or economically.