Member Info for Professor1

RNR1969

This is precisely the point I was making a few days ago. There has to be a firm commitment from any bidder for EUA to then commit to racking up what would be very expensive fees each day.

Travis
May be more to come from VanEck. Will keep a check on this

Make no mistake. This company has multiple target zones. I am expecting the free cash flows will be significantly revised upwards in time to come, even possibly double and extend the mine life to may be 15, 20 years- who knows

Possibly even more than that

No reason to panic.

One OR possibly 2 separate sales - Plus a JV

Masterpiece

https://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Fuel-Cells/Hydrogen-Boom-Could-Lead-To-New-Platinum-Bull-Market.html

https://mobile.twitter.com/DShox1/status/1320495125743751171

Charascalla will be the next drilling point

KA

Happy belated Birthday. Enjoy the weekend.

https://www.mining.com/over-1-trillion-needed-for-energy-transition-metals/

Tiddlor

Absolutely agree with you.

This is what I have found--
FORMS 8.3 AND 8.5

Forms 8.3 and 8.5 are disclosure forms required by the Takeover Panel to clarify material interests in the share register of a UK-listed company that is in a bid situation. Any person or institution that has an interest of more than 1% of the share capital of a company in a bid situation (on both sides of the transaction) must disclose any dealings in those shares and their resultant position.

Form 8.3 should be completed by the shareholder to clarify what they have bought or sold and the resultant size of their stake. Form 8.5, meanwhile, should be completed by any principal trader that has dealt in the shares.

These disclosure forms are required as part of the Takeover Code which aims to ensure an orderly framework within which takeovers can be conducted fairly and appropriately.

I noticed that prior to the takeover of IndigoVision by Motorola, forms 8.5 were released and subsequently the date of the target company leaving the AIM was announced.

Is EUA following the same pattern?

Eldorado5

Many thanks for posting this. Would you be kind enough to continue giving us such updates as I am sure people like me who don't do charting really appreciate it.

Hi Mac
Apologies - correcting myself:

"For example, a popular trading strategy, and a useful one in turbulent times, uses a hedge to protect a single share position with a CFD. Imagine, for example that you hold physical shares in a company and feel that its share price is vulnerable IN THE SHORT TERM, BUT YOU STILL WANT TO STAY INVESTED IN THE LONG RUN. If you hold 5000 shares of the company, you will be able to hedge the risks through CFDs by short selking 5000 shares CFDs to account for the risk exposure fir that particular investment in equity. If this hedge is correct, you will be able to buy your short CFD position at a lower price level and the profit achieved on your CFD will offset the PAPER LOSS on your physical shareholding ".

All makes sense now

Derivative

Hi Mac
I may be completely wrong here-
But isn't CFD a derivating taken out as a hedge against an "underlying asset" . So if you are forced to carry out a transaction in that "underlying asset" then you reverse also the derivative originally taken out to hedge. I thought this CFD as a hedge created a neutral position in any adverse price movement on the short so protects you against losses. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Stonk

That is my understanding too.

https://www.mining.com/web/gold-the-simple-math/