RE: Val 201 : from the VAL board14 Nov 2023 06:17
Riddle me this @Laura2022
Why do you care if THX merge with EUDA or not? Unless you own stock / have interests in either business?
What they do is up to them and in THEIR investor interests not VALs and certainly not PYCs
The merger of THX /EUDA and THX paying VAL any cash before VALs cash runway is out at the turn of the year are two mutually exclusive events.
The merger IMO won’t have any cash in it, watch this space. Just a promise they can raise just like the last two plus years, as such the SP over at VAL will fall like a brick as their shareholders will quickly realise that the cash to keep the lights on over at VAL into the new year can only come from a placing.
The focus on the forums by the ramping crew including you, regarding the merger is a distraction. Nobody cares. All we care about is a) if there is cash in the new created company, I believe it’s no, but this is what the rampers claim, well north of 60m to be precise b) IF and it’s a big IF would the merger complete in time and get cash to VAL in time if they did have funds and c) again IF they have funds would the deal still stand or would they want to renegotiate? I would expect any NEW board acting in their shareholder interests to at least try to secure better terms. They are not a charity.
My own view is that THX might merge BUT they still won’t have any cash. I just don’t believe for one jot there is this mystical pot of 60m plus on deposit in the Caymans that is ready to deploy - I think practically everyone on the LSE forum deep down knows it to but much prefers the fantasy version, who wouldn’t.
VAL will place again shortly at discount, watch this space, not out of VALs desire but out of necessity - if VAL don’t raise the alternative is lights out if THX don’t pay up and with numerous false promises for over two years I believe it will be much of the same.
So IF the THX /EUDA merge deal doesn't land with cash included, this means that VAL don't get their £1.3m paid and in turn PYC don't get their 6% or £78k of fees paid.
As i have said before i would prefer Jim here to focus on paid work NOT free work, anyone can be a busy fool. The VAL 201 deal should have been a paid and invoiced job as i see it, likewise this recent award that is costing PYC 30% and at the same time taking staff off other possible paying jobs. Who authorised Jim to carry out unpaid work at Shareholders expense?
I really question the commercial acumen of some of these businesses in this sector. If they were in the private sector and NOT on the AIM squandering easy to come by Investor cash on vanity projects that don't deliver revenue, this sort of nonsense business situation wouldn't happen frankly.