Member Info for PoeBardem

This subject line should change to shorter spreading FUD. Such nonsense lemonade

Whatever the case may be Bearhunt my point is only that the business continues to perform well and this is all side noise.

gb, for someone who is not deramping you seem to be trying carefully and indirectly. Its already been established Bloomberg is out of date. RNS history and the link on the AB shareholder site shows the significant holdings as of Sept 10 24.

If BOS ends up owning 14.8% so what, institution like BOS ownership even better. If you were them would you be looking for some upside? Broker is still saying £13. Bonnier already gone from the significant list. CV in or not. Even if this so called consortium assumption takes over these 14.8% they need to convince the other 15%+ here: https://audioboomplc.com/major-shareholders/

Before all this AAA tried a take over a cash / share offer at £10 and it was rejected by the board.

Then there is the publicly announced if AIM doesnt work over to US listing.

None of which related to the business performance which continues to be strong. SP will follow in due course or it goes to the US. DYOR

The point is what is between Candy and Bonnier is between them. Who cares who has money, who doesn't, who wins who loses, their problem, not investors or AB's. Even CVs 14%+ which is the only linked holding left isn't enough majority to force anything. Even if he was struggling for cash he can sell his 54million yacht his mansion in central london etc and if that really is the case then surely he's better off with a AB sp of £20 not £2. All just side show noise, fluff, irrelevant

Focus on the business. The more people bring up this fluff about side shows the more it looks like desperate deramping looking for anything to discredit the co now that there is nothing negative to say about the core business. The management continue to deliver on what they say. wider investors and the SP will catch up sooner or later. DYOR

Growingballs and others you're smelling like a Bonnier fan club or subtle derampers based on recent posts. Neither him or NC operate the business, noise. Tobin and Maddock likely have more insight into the real impact of the case and are still buying so clearly not that concerned. All side show fluff. Perhaps best to get back to focus on the business which is delivering on it's updates and performing well.

Dews - Thank you for returning this to sensible focus on the 'business' which is performing well.

Bonnier no longer a significant holder - https://audioboomplc.com/major-shareholders/

Candy 14%+ like other long term holders likely prefer this at 10+ not scraping £2.10

Irrelevant if focused on the business and to an acquirer who would be looking at the business performance.

Still amazed at why people trust that it's that efficient on AIM and no skullduggery goes on

The company continues to deliver in line with their public updates.Sooner or later a wider group of investors will take note.

Yesterday all trades executed below the ask above the bid around 2.12. We know 2 of those were buys but all show as sells and others could be buys? Last 2 tiny trades of 13 and 7 late in the day at bid 2.10 pulling the price down. Anyone have an explanation or still look like some type of manipulation to keep the price down?

How do we know how the market is actually reacting if buys keep showing up as sells?

All trades today similar price and under ask. Wonder how many more are actually buys.

Same thing yesterday.

The 50 is a buy showing as a sell

The industry comparisons show AB is undervalued. If the share price doesn't start to reflect a sensible valuation on AIM management have said clearly that they will take action. Roll on US listing in the case. DYOR

Not bad contracts, higher minimum guarantees which affected (past) the industry not only AB. To secure talent. This is no longer the case and has settled with newer contracts. If you understand the content and ad industry this is part of the course and depends on competition for talent at a time. Higher minimums only mean a longer period to pay off talent. The latest contracts are not effected as management have said. The upside is that when these older deals pay off which updates suggest is soon its means more upside for the company. DYOR

Zak thought you were 80k long at an average of 4+? Once again when good news is published, who in that position posts with comments like..

"hahahahaha...its still down -1% on the month and -24% YTD"

"My gut feeling says these are coming back down"

Nothing you post can be trusted

Agree Boombang EBITDA is widely used to give an idea of profitability and growth trend.

Alderman in prior posts doesnt understand the company has ad-tech, what booked revenue is and more so doubtful he understands the market, business or finances at all. Or he has a hidden agenda which shows in the way he posts and repeats questions already addressed

Revenue growth of 35% in August 2024 (over August 2023) is incredibly pleasing and is driven by record performance by Showcase - our scalable, tech-based advertising marketplace.

"tech-based"

Record monthly revenue from Showcase, our global advertising marketplace, of US$2.5 million, up 143% on August 2023 (US$1.0 million)

For anyone with understanding of the ad market cycles will know this is going to get better as progress to year end

CEO comment - Q4 is always our highest demand period

Great news but not unexpected given very clear updates on booked and messaging from management throughout H1. Agree whatwhat more upside once the contracts with minimums flush out.