Member Info for PL75

Rippers was addressing someone else, you decided to wade in, in the same way you waded in at the weekend. It’s your MO, it’s what a sea lion does. Otherwise, you need to change the record, we’ve heard all these repetitive speeches before. Perhaps write a book and then if anyone is having difficulty nodding off they can buy a copy.

Anyway…. You’re more like the second one, it’s all about you… https://youtu.be/VQzbMCZXDTQ

Just got back from McDonalds. I had to keep my shades on as there was a bloke in there that kept tripping up and had the most unbelievably white teeth I’ve ever seen. He was mumbling something about sauces and a telegram.

Anyway, thanks for the good thread (until the disruptive sealion popped by)

Your calculator is upside down

They've still got accounts, they'll no doubt turn up when it's in their interest to clog the board. No loss...

I’m not ready, I’ve been busy doing my homework

He’s played the man not the ball! That’s it! I’m off to twatter!

BITL, looks like you’ll have to accept an angry paragraph as an apology. We’ve tried to help him, but what can you do…

I’ve misplaced my Collins dictionary, so I booted up Netscape using my AOL dial up but could only find this: ‘AVA6000 has no efficacy whatsoever’.

At this stage of humiliation probably best to just admit to being wrong and apologise to BITL. Then in future perhaps take a moment to check before attempting to be a pedantic twat. Try a dictionary or maybe this new fangled google thing - you can easily find references to prodrug efficacy. Maybe even consider not trying to be a pedantic twat in the first place, I don’t know…

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409933/

“Prodrug efficacy can be defined as the ability to distribute the payload to the site of action. At the site of action, the payload is released to engage the drug target. Ideally, prodrug efficacy would be determined directly by its ability to produce either the intended pharmacodynamic effect at the site of action or alternatively the payload quantified at the relevant site of action”

Googled

Answering questions that nobody asked since 4th Dec 2014

Anyway, you’re a troll. An exceptionally dull sea lion of a troll. An exceptionally dull calamitous trading sea lion of a troll.

No lies from me…

Hey Dacia, thought you weren’t a fan of posting things from over a year ago? What a hypocrite... I stand by what I said about China, it was a discussion about a zero covid policy. They’re still having lockdowns with the same policy so looks like I was right about it. NZ had a similar policy that was ultimately successful. The point was that the U.K. as an island could and should have done the same - I said get to get the army out very early on. But… if you preferred the policy that resulted in thousand of excess deaths by a govt partying in private, that’s up to you. I wasn’t wrong, it was an opinion, but if that’s all you’ve got… incidentally, some might call it cherry picking. Hope you’re not a hypocrite. Oh wait.

Meanwhile, you keep saying your trading record is great. I’ve also said you should start a thread in general and post your trades in advance. Prove what a god you are. So far the evidence suggests you’re only gifted at losing 95% of your cash. Several times. Oops. Dacia by name, Dacia by nature.

Anyway, you’re a troll. An exceptionally dull sea lion of a troll. An exceptionally dull calamitous trading sea lion of a troll.

‘monumentally stupid and that fact you didn't understand why what you were quoting showed your ignorance just makes it really funny.’

I quoted the dictionary you utter moron, that’s what was really funny. You were wrong and clearly can’t handle it. Grow up you freak of a man baby. And there you go again… toys out of the pram, ohhh woe is me, I’m not posting anymore, booo hooo, please gather around and beg me not to go. If you change your attitude, then one day you’ll be able to change the record. Look up humility in the dictionary when you finished learning what efficacy means. It’s ok to get things wrong, you’ll be ok sweet pea

Dearest donkey riding oddball, I’ve never posted a single thing about the trial and any of the technicalities. I’ve only ever posted that I’m looking forward to the results and that ever day that passes is a good thing as it continues. Sorry to disappoint you, but I don’t overly care about the technical side of it, I leave that to others, I just enjoy reading about it. However, most posters manage to share their knowledge without needing to try to be smug, patronising or antagonistic, they don’t find a need to be an arrogant twat, they just enjoy sharing and discussing their research. Try getting off your donkey once in a while and not being a twat, you might find you like it.

Yawn, Dacia is here. Discussions are indeed difficult due to the personalities. That was exactly BITLs point, the donkey rider hasn’t ever managed a genuine conversation on here as his precious ego doesn’t allow him to concede when he gets things wrong. The board would be much better off without his attitude and clearly without twats like you - you’re simply a troll poster (with an absolutely atrocious trading record). I only ever respond when he’s being a twat, I can’t help it if that’s 99% of the time. There wasn’t any reason at all for him to name me in his post, only he knows why he did that. Well, other than he’s a twat, obviously.

Thank you for the compliment. Otherwise, I simply correct.

Managed to understand what efficacy means yet? Still struggling to use a calendar? Any more price predictions? Any delicious sauce recommendations? Nope? Best trot off to get another filet o fish…

Clip clop… hark as he trots off in to the distance, until next time when he does the same thing again… whilst in the meanwhile bleating on twatter about LSE and how much he hates it. What a twat.

I simply correct.

I mean, what a colossal bell. Shame you get things wrong so often huh?

Clip clop clip clop…. In he trounces aboard his steed, name checking as he posts another patronising arrogant deliberately antagonistic paragraph without any provocation at all. Then cries when people point out he’s a twat. What a twat.

The challenge posed by Timster was to see if anyone could find anything negative in the progress so far. All we’ve had is the question if it fails, will the price fall. Yes, thanks Captain Obvious. Let’s move on from answering that and get back to the original point of this thread. Anyone?

efficacy
/'?f?k?si/
noun: efficacy
the ability to produce a desired or intended result.
"there is little information on the efficacy of this treatment"

AVA6000 has the ability to produce a desired or intended result.

I simply correct.

*boom