Member Info for PL75

Thanks for sharing, good find

I threw £30 in the unclaimed pot, don’t spend it all at once

Yeah, but why else would she give a presentation? Shirley this entirely independently arranged event wouldn’t have been put on unless she was planning on blabbering out a bunch of market sensitive information?

I’ve also filtered on the same basis and I deeply care about who else has done so

I’d be surprised if there were many excess shares knocking about, although I didn’t bother on a separate isa account as it only included the shares from my recent ‘top up’ and I couldn’t be bothered with the admin of transferring the £30 or so. I’ll treat that recent open market purchase at a price just over a quid as my bonus allocation - not a million miles from 95p.

As was true last month, but you weren’t lingering then.

In the grand scheme of things, at the peak it was a very modest rise if It Works (tm). It was fuelled by a ramptastic twatter frenzy based on the possibility that news could arrive on Saturday.

How’s about this… news could drop *any* day.

I’m still trying to find a keyboard that is incapable of typing normal apostrophes

Did you read the RNS jr? Try again. You’re a ramping moron that appears like a fly on sh.t.

Today was much ado about nothing. CSO said she’s presenting the preclinical data. That’s it.

We can positively infer that It Works (tm), but that’s it for now. They’re certainly getting out and about, all part of drumming up interest. We’re seeing the PR we’ve not seen in the past which is great, but all this relentless ramping balls is plain ridiculous. I can only dream that we stay off the top share chat and top risers as the rocket clowns are easily as moronic as when the doom sayers turned up - who knows, maybe it’s the same people…

Weird, just earlier our one indicator gambling wonder was advocating buying as it was going to rise. Hope all those whipsaws and losses aren't adding up to too much.

No way! Genuinely shocked that they’re not going to announce the trial results at an event that was completely independently planned. Whatever next?

What price do you think we could get to?

Don't. Just don't.

I’m extremely relaxed about the trial and as long as it goes well I couldn’t care less how long it takes - within sensible reason. I expected delays as it’s in the nature of a trial, sh.t happens. Obviously I couldn’t agree more about the LFT saga and WaffAl’s form in communicating one vague thing after another, but my expectations have always been set on the final outcome for AVA6k. Not just for the benefit of my bank balance but due to the potential to improve lives. Anyway, think we’re agreed.

By the way, rather than picking up a brochure, just make one in photoshop and slap it on twatter

Bein, I wouldn’t see any extension to phase 1a as a delay - that’s the language used by those with dogsh.t covered gravel for teeth. Those days are gone, funding is sorted and any shift in timings for the greater good of the trial can only ever be a positive and more evidence It Works (tm). I’m not suggesting it’ll happen, I’m offering a possibility. I’m all for the next RNS announcing the completion of phase 1a, that no MTD was found because it’s a miracle cure and that full detail including biopsy data will be revealed in the upcoming Science Day. Followed by a chunky licence deal for 3996 covering enough cash to get AVA6k to market. Followed by a suspension as we’re being taken over for £200 exc Chin-ah. Rampilicious enough everyone?

According to ‘ol dogsh.t teeth TW, who got it spectacularly wrong - they were trying to raise even more at 80p. We’ll never know, speculation either way isn’t helpful. Just wait for the results, they shouldn’t be too far away.

As it’s AIM, be prepared for a curve ball. Maybe the additional funding was an anticipation of an extension of phase 1a further DEs as they can’t reach a MTD and with every DE they know their position is strengthened for licence negotiations. That would be legal. They can raise cash whenever they want for whatever reason, but a thank you wouldn’t be one of them - do you think sequoia flooring who invested at 120p would be impressed? We can all speculate, but it’s pointless.

No, it’s not a thank you gesture. The reasons were set out clearly, to fund a M&A strategy for Dx to secure the funding future of the entire company. A thank you gesture would be incredibly stupid.

Yes, of course they would legally be able to raise money if the clinical data was not aligned with pre clinical. They might struggle to do so and they wouldn’t have gained the backing of HannaBarbara, but why would legality have anything to do with it?

https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/explore-mental-health/a-z-topics/gambling-and-mental-health

‘Gambling can cause low self-esteem, stress, anxiety and depression if gambling becomes a problem.’

“As for gambling of course it is”. Remember that folks when we get the next tedious lecture.

Congrats winbore, you’ve taken the first step. Good luck with your recovery.
https://www.gamblersanonymous.org.uk/

Is your real name Ron? Is this you with another of your trading strategies?
https://youtu.be/XS3Lkl31Ams

Failed gambler moron.

gmcc, you’re right to call that out and just nipped in before me. Using a single backward looking indicator is a guaranteed way to lose money, especially on aim with large spreads and the fees. That’s a backtest provable fact. It’s moronic. Turns out our resident sealion expert is as much of an expert as Britishbulls. No wonder he won’t post all of his trades in general. Utter naivety. Might as well google best trading strategies and follow the advice of the first article you see. If it worked, it would be adopted by all, which would mean it wouldn’t work. I don’t see any hedge funds getting rid of their quants any time soon for that incredible strategy. So, we’re just left with a verbose idiot that’s failing at gambling yet convinced there’s science behind it. Avoid this fool at all (consistent and large) costs.