Member Info for PL75

Great thread you started. ‘If people haven't got something positive, helpful or constructive to contribute then I wish they would STFU.’

Indeed.

Rivington Street Holdings? They’re going down to the price of a slice of pizza, I’d bet my dogsh.t covered gravel teeth on it.

Rippers, it’s as simple as you’ve stated. They’re in the business of making money. It was a great deal, todays RNS results in less interest due, we’ve gained a profitable Dx business and a stockpile of cash. The alternative was months of cash burn chat and a genuine risk of a 20p placing. The brain numbing tedium is the downside of this deal, we’ll get plenty similar RNSs, hopefully they’ll become white noise. There can’t be any compliant about the bond holder cashing in, it’s their prerogative. It has no relevance to the trial which is the value driver here.

Bein, I can offer a subscription to my grubby website shareproffits.twat for just £6.99 a month if you’re interested in trading? I’ve just heard that there’s a 20p placing due, that’s just one example of the inside information I illegally get access to.

Yeah, have a look at popular AIM shares. Ideally pick one that’s had a decent run recently. Then spend 2 mins doing some rudimentary research (optional), maybe read a Motley Fool article, perhaps write one based on your 2 mins research and then you can quote it. Pick a round number and post that you’re concerned it’s going to fall to that level as you’re a long term holder. Don’t worry that you’re doing the same thing on 26 other boards. Keep doing it with the 14 other accounts LSE let you run. If it doesn’t work just try again with a higher number. Eventually you can say you’re right. Don’t worry about the actual shorting part, it’s mainly just to try to get the stupidest of ignorant mugs to sign up to your grubby website.

Compare and contrast to the poster at AACR last year. Released an RNS saying they’ll release the poster, the event happened, then the poster/RNS was released. So, they’ve released an RNS saying they’ll be a science day and they’ll share the presentation, the event will happen, then they’ll release an RNS with the presentation. It’ll contain more detail, but we’ve had the headlines. If there’s something new in the interim, it’ll be released as normal.

Trolling isn’t a discussion, it’s disruptive. Tel the bell is posting lies about blackrock is not a different view. I don’t care what the price does, I don’t care if tel the bell posts about it as it’s already on my screen, but it’s not a discussion.

Thick as mince.

Tel the bell is posting lies about blackrock who increased by 1.4m. Report him. And stop responding.

.

Too many theys… we made a deal, they can do what they want with the convertible.

I don’t care. They made a deal, they bought a profitable business. We’re going to get a lot of very similar RNSs and spin can be applied either way. They can do whatever they want, cash or shares, sell them, give them away, it’s irrelevant. I didn’t invest in them, I invested in Abakta. As for tel the bell, just report and ignore him. Disruptive and posting repeated lies.

What a market sensitive info could they possibly have? We know It Works (tm), they’ll have been presented with TAM, detail of the pipeline. There’s plenty info, including the conservative Trinity Delta note that can demonstrate they’re undervalued, including the recent share price, Sequoia Carpets had less info and bought in at 120p. Ample due diligence is possible without inside info. We should probably prepare a FAQ as this thread will be repeated…

Naaa, they’re there to fluff for Alan. They won’t know anything that’s not released in an RNS. Alan will give an update, if there’s market sensitive info, it’ll be released and then the KOLs will do what they do best, give opinions. Opinions such as ‘OMFG, they’ve cracked the holy grail’. They wouldn’t be invited to hear about how rubbish it’s going, so we should have confidence that it continues to progress well.

Agree DTW, when the kids are back in their play rooms it’s a great board. Thanks to those contributing to the intelligent discussion today.

Thanks JT

Any views on JTs reply? He is saying the ratio is independent of the dose, be that 1x, 6x or 4x. You chirping away in the background whilst licking a window because you’re so pleased you can do basic maths is completely irrelevant to the discussion. PAH thinks differently. Any sage wisdom to bring or are you sticking with drooling down a window? If you want a clever boy badge because you are so bright you figured out AVA6k isn’t pure dox, then by all means have one and trot away again but you’re just pointlessly childishly trying to point score. Embarrassing oaf.

I never said it was 6x dox numb nuts. How. Many. Times. My word you’re thick. The discussion is about the ratio of AVA6k, that is what is being dosed to patients. That’s what is of interest. Anything useful to add to the discussion or are you sticking with childish pathetic incorrect point scoring? Anything to say to PAH?

Here’s my post: The 18x was based on 6x dose, the increased dosage is overlooked by most people that post 18x. If we get 18x based on escalations to date it would be phenomenal.

I’m referring to 6x AVA6k resulting in 18x as per the slide. Simple as that. If you’re struggling, try harder, thicko. Back in your box until panto season.

I didn’t refer to dox. Back to twatter, moron.