Member Info for PJT12

Can I suggest we do not start placing too much potentially misplaced enthusiasm on submission deadlines. The more recent prelims said the additional information submission is expected to be forwarded to the FDA "in May", rather than "early May". The most important thing is for the company to employ 'haste' rather than 'speed'. Any overly optimistic deadlines set on boards such as this only lend themselves to derampers if those timelines are not then met. This is a great company and anytime they are ready to submit that additional info is good for me, be that early or late May, as stated.

Somebody likes it:

Date Time Trade Prc Volume Buy/Sell Value
06-May-21 17:07:28 30.50 244,617 Buy* 74.61k O

Tango1, exactly! The only thing that thread will achieve is to cause further harm to the SP potentially. I would be angry if I'd been burnt but it's a risk that always comes with AIM. I was one of those who got burnt in the Avacta placing leak. THAT really stung but if I look at their SP now in relation to the £1.20 then........ Anger is not going to help anyone - PI's especially - and you are better sleeping on any decision.

Okay, I know I fed the thread :-) My bad!

Sanderling, I must confess that I am always very suspicious of "holders" who create an account in order to post a negative comment at an "opportunistic" moment. Why would anyone who professes to have spent six months building up a holding suddenly choose to post such a provocative header especially? I believe I already know the answer or = more importantly - your agenda. I would suggest that others here do not feed the thread.

People should express their frustrations but now? Really?

If we are really on the downward curve of Covid then that throws open real channels of opportunity in the five core markets in which we are involved: cruise & ferry, commercial fabrication, oil & gas, defence (govt) and renewables. Just think for a moment why all of those areas would not have been looking to dish-out contracts over the last 12 months but why they are likely to be doing so in order to reactivate themselves through the remainder of 2021. Don't forget, Infrastrata has only been operating in its present form since August. Why would anyone sell now, especially having sat through the worst of times that Covid has been throwing at our prospective customers? Or, more positively, why sell as the dawn of their revival starts to appear?

I don't think we will get this share much cheaper than this in a potentially transformational year.

Can we change from the "Assessment" thread header as this will hopefully attract more interest amongst those potential new buyers who can see the potential.

............especially "Scottish jobs" where government contracts are concerned.

This, from the interims, is one of of the main reasons I've invested money that I feel is worth the risk this morning:

"The Government has identified five key shipyards which it would like to see flourish via a slew of UK Defence programmes and the broader National Shipbuilding Strategy that is currently being implemented. Of the five, Belfast and Appledore were specifically named, and we believe that there is a strong desire within Government to rejuvenate shipbuilding at a national level, not only for defence / Government led contracts but also with an eye on the broader export markets globally. We have sought to position ourselves at the centre of Government policy and all our facilities are capable of delivering on these types of contracts. We believe that we have the optimum mix of capacity, capability and skill to bid for these large contracts and deliver them on time and on budget."

That alone is worth the current share price and more if it comes good. There can be no doubt that anything that looks good for Infrastrata - jobs creation through contracts - will be 'good' for the government. We just need to see the first and this SP will be history. It is a risk but a worthile one imo.

I'm not a holder here but have followed the company closely. Covid stocks no longer float my boat but the COPD potential here suggests to me that it is now undervalued in the longer term.

.....and I, for all that's worth, believe they will RNS us.

Chester18, my guess -but that's all it is - would be anything from 1 to 3 months from the time of submission of the additional data. However, the potential for valuable interim additional contracts and further peer reviews spices up the wait and will preclude trading amongst sensible LTH.

This is one of the most exciting companies on AIM - and, no, unlike so many posters on LSE, I do not say things like that lightly and, yes, I am heavily invested. I am happy to go with whatever CEO, Andrew Newland, decides. Strikes me as a good man and a shrewd cookie. After all, he's brought us this far. New investors need to look at the content within my previous post - seriously.

Agree totally with researcher1.

There are only two things that prospective new investors need to look at here. Firstly, the following presentation which outlines the unique and highly exciting technology and its huge potential market:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmihuELlhDM&t=5s

Secondly, how rapidly ANGLE PLC is moving forward and how we have already done since that presentation:

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/AGL/preliminary-results-bz4lz37r3tmhatw.html

Personally speaking, the short / medium term commercial potential / science here does not lend itself to LTH wanting a takeover.

Oh, I forgot G) Mentally deranged?............. but you've just answered that.

Take care.

Ndn, I'm starting to wonder if you've got some sort of thing going on with the Guinness Book of Records where your number of posts is concerned. Every time I log on........................ C'mon which is it?

A) Guinness Record attempt
B) Single and lonely
C) Deramping
D) Escaping from an unhappy relationship
E) OCD case
F) All of the above

I actually find you quite entertaining but it ain't normal, fella. Whatever the reason, enjoy the rest of your weekend.

Guys, my awkward questions are not wholly without intention. I am not the greatest researcher and will never have the sharpest mind on this board but I have always been a fairly useful interviewer. If I can get others with greater knowledge to positively answer the awkward questions that derampers will see as holes in our product then the latter will be undermined and 'less secure' investors will be reassured. Grateful thanks to all who have come up with the goods under this thread today.

speranza, definitely not deramping as I bought more yesterday. Truthfully? Your initial sarcasm hacked me off when your final explanation would've been appreciated, as it is.

PAH00, would you agree that mologic is fairly close to us? Certainly closer than I expected. Put another way, is it outside our comfort zone or how much better is ours? I am only asking what alot of others will be wondering.

Zabadoo, we are talking about the Mologic test.