Member Info for PJT12

........you derampers need to back off, that is unless you want me to set them on your bolx!!

Okay, enough time has now passed and, quite frankly, my guilt has just become too much of a burden for me to bear. Therefore....

It was me! I let the dogs out!!!!

Anyone know what happened to the knowledgeable poster named simply "Andrew" who used to be on here?

Spot on, Watching. Don't waste my time, Thornogson, or your own. Your history tells us all we need to know about you.

....."My only personal solace....." wouldn't be out of place if being uttered from Del Boy's lips :))))

Wyn, I've always supported your contrarian view in the past but even I find it hard to see you painting yourself as a "victim" here :))) I think your key sentence there is "My only personal solace is that I managed to profit from some trades". Rather gives the game away ;-)

I remember working for a very clever Cambridge educated graduate - who was a total idiot on the common sense / attention to detail fronts. Academic / scientific prowess isn't the only consideration in a CEO. I get the impression though that CC is very determined and doesn't suffer fools. Hopefully my judge of character is equally impressive!

Agree with the sentiment but AS119, your interesting history suggests a large dose of hypocrisy coming from you. robizm1001, point taken.

Let's not enable TG2D to spread his poison through choosing his own subject header, researcher1.

People can see the latest RNS and his history to see the real picture here.

"your" time.

TwoGood2Die, and yet you consider it worth spending so much of you time on a share that you consider a dog? Strange that ;-) I repeat: Your history and the latest RNS tells people all they need to know.

You'll have to forgive me, TwoGood2Die, but you lost my interest at "My view...". Your history and the latest RNS tells people all they need to know.

Wyn, "something smells off to me". See where you are coming from but if he'd done anything that could be to the serious detriment of the company's current position then the market regulations say they'd have to have announced it as soon as it was known by them? They didn't and we must therefore assume that it was something along the lines of the future strategic direction or a power struggle.

And talking of BS.....

Having done my due diligence, studied my charts and listened to the experts out there, I've bought back-in, largely through eventually ignoring all of those and resorting to one of my favourite investment measurements of choice..........that being my gut feeling whilst listening to the briefing earlier this week and noting how the smell of waffly BS appeared to have lifted.

This may drift a little in the coming weeks but that'll be down to the MM's taking advantage of a slight news void. Alternatively, they may think that we are basing our decisions around that thinking and stymy us by pushing it back up - imo!

Thinking back to a previous investment of mine involving liquid biopsies, I can remember somebody saying (probably the CEO) how the advantage of being able to take repeated liquid biopsies involved being able to check on how the chemo being used was affecting the tumor cells because the many types of chemo were often effectively a lottery for Oncologists. Others more knowledgeable on here (or those invested in that company) will be able to elaborate further. All of this does tie in with what CC said though and this understanding is pretty exciting imo.

Klaus Hochleitner - we need to start all over again and bring him back into the Avacta fold.

Where the Coris and Launch Diagnostics acquisitions were concerned, weren't they most likely just down to AS's previous stated aims of several years ago when developing the LFT: for Avacta to become a household name on the wider testing front (beyond Covid). I just think his ego (yet again) got ahead of him and he didn't realise his limited capabilities on the finance front.

D-Geeman, possible NDA and severance package should avoid that?

✉️

(Saddo, I know)

Sheppy, I wasn't surprised at all to see you jumping on the back of Rory's lengthy, perfectly fair and 'considered' post, largely because - looking at your last 20 posts, you have not offered one single substantive or constructive thought. Virtually every one of your posts boils down to one or two lines (max - feel free to check) of nothing other than sniping - an easy option for anyone who can do little more than think on an empty head. I am not a censor here as I am not actually invested at present but I have followed Avacta for several years. Personally, the only justification that I can see for your existence here is to ensure that full advantage of the filter box is taken.