Not the same19 Oct 2020 13:04
Some talk of AMC vs HZM , I see there are a number of holders of both stocks. Whilst they are both Nickel related stocks the similarity ends there.
The pre-feasibility study of the Kun-Manie project revealed annual nickel production would be slightly under 16,000 tonnes p.a. yielding a total output of 159,000 tonnes over a 10-year mine life. Kun-Manie’s net present value is calculated at $84 million after tax and the project has an IRR of 15.7 percent. The nickel price used in the study was $7.50 per pound, or $16,530 per tonne.
For HZM Araguaia's NPV @$16,800/t Ni is $740m with an IRR 28.1 percent , a 28 year mine life, producing a forecast 426kt Ni over the life of the mine.
So Araguaia has twice the IRR, the effect of lowest quartile production costs and low relative capex, more or less three times the mine life due to the much larger resource, and nearly three times the total amount of expected nickel production.
If you add Vermelho then the comparison gets really silly. 38 year mine life at 30kt p.a. , NPV of $1.7Bn , IRR 26.3% . The NPV of just Vermelho is around 20x Kun Marie.
Then there is Serra do Tapa and the other resources without PFS yet.
Its a good contrast to show the relative valuations, and why it is important that HZM is sat on two tier 1 assets vs AMC's single smaller scale tier 2 project. AMC could make money in a high value Nickel market, and their current valuation is a discount to their NPV.
However HZM have a different order of magnitude of assets.