Member Info for Phimx

Chipofftheblock: You post

" The software is being tested on a range of options with different companies,"

Please explain where that information comes from, a link will do.

Mickydj:

So I'm assuming from this long post about Sipiem.

You have given up on the possibility of revenue from the Methods and you are now espousing a great life to come from a legacy court case.

Mickydj: You post

"Because the litigation dates back to the Clear Leisure phase of the company, it is sometimes repeatedly referenced to suggest that the company is still fundamentally tied to historic legal disputes.

In reality:

• The Sipiem matter is a legacy legal recovery from an earlier phase of the company"

So what you are saying is the company 𝗶𝘀 fundamentally 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 tied to legacy disputes.

Mickydj:

I note that you don't claim my posts are false and misleading nowadays.

Your only complaint seems to be the repetition.

I'm glad you've realised the error of your ways, thank you

Mickydj:

Gardin said most of the 2 million placing would be used to fund SaaS infrastructure.

Does this facility now exist ?

Mickydj:

Do we really have to run through all the ASIC dreams dangled in front of wide-eyed naive investors like you, believing in an ASIC that was better than any in existence. Did you believe Gardin had reserved a slot in a 7nm semiconductor foundry. I'm sure those boys would want big money up front from some hick company that had no history or money.

Of course I'm peddling lies. The ASIC is in production isn't it Micky right now it's being sold to Chinese miners and that revenue is also raining down on QBT.

Everything I write is false and misleading, it's all really happened just as Gardin predicted in his RNS.

And he went to NEMS with his mystery team but was so busy arranging Mega deals he forgot to take any photos.

Millions tomorrow Micky tomorrow!

Mickydj:

Show me where the 2 Million went on the SaaS infrastructure - show me. Show me the RNS that states its up and running in North America. Show me the revenue pouring in from the mining pools raking in Bitcoins.

Your trying very hard to shut down dissent, why you'll be rich very soon when Gaddin signs the deal for millions!!

It's going to arrive any day now, isn't it Micky?

All those 10s of thousands of miners paying license fees to QBT.

Methinks you don't believe it's going to happen. Methinks you been had, to fund a non commercial development project, that's going nowhere slowly!

Mickydj: You post

" I sincerely hope that if any disputes or litigation ever arise from commentary of this nature, the individuals making such claims are comfortable standing behind the words they have posted."

Feeling comfortable in the knowledge that is just another AIM eternal development project that enriches Gardin but not LT holders. It's Gardin that will have to back up his grand claims.

Mickydj: You post

" Long time forum users know exactly what that technique is called"

Oh no, not the big conspiracy y technique. Perhaps somewhat less costly to investors than the Gardin technique, pocket big fees for project consultancy work and produce nothing. I wonder if those fees are part of the development costs. Are all 20 experts still working for peanuts ?

How could anyone believe this ?

Mickdj: You post

" Long time forum users know exactly what that technique is called"

It's called waiting patiently for Gardin to deliver something ... anything!!

Mickydj:

What is it now, coming up for 5 years of unfulfilled drivel from Gardin.

Share price fading along with the fading dream. Perhaps he'll retire soon, what's the point of making loads of money if you don't spend it?

Mickydj: You post

" That is exactly the pattern that keeps being pointed out."

Strange because that's the same pattern Gardin and QBT produce

Mickydj:

It looks like the last update was just simply fluff and filler for a company that has nothing of note to show investors. If you are a genuine LT investor you must be seriously naive not to have doubts about Gafdin and his story.

Mickydj: You post

" At this stage the update simply says QBT intends to work with the open mining platform and attempt to integrate its methods."

So, it's just another NDA type company.

I wonder if 256 Foundation will be signing a NDA, would seem to be at odds with their ethos.

Mickydj: You post

"If QBT can implement its Methods on this open platform, it could test them on real mining rigs and demonstrate measurable improvements without needing permission from any specific chip manufacturer."

Method C Software is independent of the ASIC

Mickydj: You post

" In plain English, this means QBT intends to learn the full open mining system and apply its Methods (A, B and C) to it."

Does this imply they don't understand the mining system at present ? It all sounds jolly good,Gardin has managed fit in the latest click-bait term 'full stack'

What's to understand apart from the OS for methods A and B. For Method C a new ASIC. It's all just SHA256 for Bitcoin and QBT didn't have to understand the 'full stack' for any other groups. My glitter for the naive I suspect.

Mickydj: You post

" QBT went to a Bitcoin mining conference in Nashville."

You are joking, relying on something written by Gardin ! Where have you been ? Did Garden attend NEMS? In the past he has posted photos of himself at events, this time he didn't. So what evidence is there he attended? After so many failings and lack of details from Gardin I think it is fair for investors to have doubts, of pretty much anything he writes or says. There have been too many issues raised by me and others, most of which you have tried to have removed or attempt to discredit the posters claiming multiple IDs and other nonsense.

It is time Gardin showed evidence of his many claims. A photo of him and his management team, whoever they may be, would be a creditable beginning.

Mickydj:

I note your continued repetition trying to discredit posters but you don't eefute posters claims. Such as

Explain how the ASIC Ultra Boost can be granted when it is utterly obvious it is based upon prior art. Since Gardin was basing his new venture on this optimisation it is totally inconceivable he did not read Naik's final words at the end of his thesis I.e.

"It is believed that the suggested optimisations will bring about radical throughput improvements in Bitcoin mining devices. They will also allow Bitcoin miners to make a lot ofsavings in their electricity bills. It was decided to make all this information public with thevision of the betterment of the Bitcoin community and it is hoped that these findings will bea stepping stone to faster and more efficient Bitcoin mining.

“Vires in Numeris” "

You include this prior art claim below. I think perhaps you would like it never to be mentioned again, along with many other Gardin failures

Mickydj:

Repetition ensures naive newcomers have the opportunity to examine both sides of the QBT fence. It gives them a chance to decline the wonderful offers made by rampers and ultimately prevent them becoming locked in to a lifestyle company.

Just like you have !

Just to follow up what I said about the 7% improvement figure yesterday

RNS 5 November 2021

" ... Preliminary approximate calculations indicate that on a 12nm ASIC chip, extrapolated by comparing it

to a commercial mid-range 16nm ASIC Bitcoin mining chip (with circa 300 million gates), our ASIC could

achieve a double hash rate of 392 GH/s, with the ASIC ULTRA Boost optimisation adding an extra 7%

as previously announced, reaching 419 GH/s, which would still be 2.26 times slower than the fastest

ASIC commercially available...."

So this is, according to Gardin, an optimisation by Naik from Prior Art clearly. Chances of obtaining a patent from ASIC ULTRA Boost application is nil