Member Info for Phimx

Mickdj: You post

" Misleading revenue statements"

I think thus subject has been well and truly talked to death

Mickdj: You post

" Governance concerns"

I don't think I have ever posted that I have governance concerns. Please provide proof of your accusations

Oldsharedog:

Why don't you email him, after all it's your money he's playing with. I would find it almost impossible to believe that any investor would not want to know if Gardin attended and also when the mining hardware is to be transfered to Milan. It's been in limbo now for almost 3 months , essentially for a very trivial task.

QBT burns while Micky fiddles with posts.

Mickdj: You post

" Where is your evidence of wrongdoing Phimx ?"

Has Gardin committed wrongdoing Micky ?

Mickydj: You post

" He connects hardware delays to conference attendance and says Gardin now has an obligation to prove he was there."

Why are you trying to imply there is something wrong with conne ting the two? The two are obviously well and truly entwined. Gardin explicitly states so, in fact he has little else to say, instead updating for the 256 Foundation.

Gardin's failure, so far, to substantiate his attendance and also what actual timing has been arranged for delivery of the hardware is unusual at the very least. It only adds fuel to the fire for the sceptics whereas a simple photo verification as previohs conferences would pour water on the fire before it really begins to blaze.

𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 ?

Even you Micky can see the reason and sense for doing so.

Mickydj:

In view of the negative impact of the recent update and the lack of actual detail regarding delivery of mining machines I.e.

"These discussions were focused on the timing for the delivery of both hardware and software from these potential customers and commercial partners"

Particularly as QBT has been waiting almost 3 months for the hardware!

Then it is Gaddin's obligation to support investors and the company by substantiating his attendance at the NEMS2026 Summit.

This will restore some confidence in Gardin and importantly in the progression of the Method C software to commercialisation.

𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 ?

Ember One

Skot was able to complete the validation process on Ember One v4. This hashboard is now ready to go into production. Anyone is free to grab the production files from the GitHub repo v4 branch and start manufacturing and distributing these units. We will be following up with an official releaseof v4 in the days ahead. Ember One is a ~100W hashboardbuilt around the Bitmain BM1362AC ASIC chips and itcapable of producing roughly 3.5Th/s. This is unlike the Bitaxe in that the control board is separate. This is the hashboard only and all peripheral equipment like the control board, firmware, power supply, heatsink, and fan are separate. We will be pointing to reference components for those separate items in the weeks ahead as these hashboards

get manufactured and we can test different components.

Obelisk:

The main problem is there is only a tiny handful of people here discussing this story. The reason for that lies firmly at the feet of the only man that actually knows the truth - Gardin.

But, he is being far too evasive, making too many pivots and not delivering the goals he sets to make this company and himself a credible investment.

Mickydj: You posted

" suggested lack of evidence for “virtually everything”

You got that one right. Virtually everything written or spoken by Gardjn cannot be corroborated by secondary or third party evidence.

His appearance at previous conferences in the US have been supported by photograps but for some reason not this Nashville 26 trip.

Where is attendance at Nashville substantiated?

Show the photos!!

Mickydj:

I think most of the allegations are created by you misrepresenting what I have written.

You have claimed:

"suggested governance concerns around family employment"

I asked the question how much was Gardin's daughter paid for her role?

You claimed the governance angle and I asked if there was a governance issue. You didn't reply.

I'll ask again, what is the governance issue because I'm not aware of one relating to the role of Gardin's daughter.

Mickdj: You post

" Often followed by abuse"

I think any right minded person would have to look long and hard at my posts before finding abuse. Of course since you don't describe your version of abuse it is then difficult to argue against your accusations. You used to use that approach quite a lot, or did until quite recently but it now appears again. You have also recently seemingly stopped reporting posters for false and misleading posts. Perhaps you will revert to type soon. I do ponder these changes in approach in your attempts to vilify posters you disagree with.

Oldsharedog: You post

" Phimx - Have you emailed to ask Gardin for the photo's ??"

No, I was concerned he would not understand my poor gramma and I would end up on a date. Even worser he didn't understand the type of photo I wanted!

Mickydj:

Is working hard today.

Mickydj:

Nice to see you accept Gardin's revenue statement in interview 2024. Now you just need to accept it didn't happen. That's quite an easy step to take because everyone here knows it didn't.

You need to review your assumptions made of my posts, some are inaccurate, some accurate.

Mickydj:

I think virtually all investors would like to see Gardin back up this story with some substance. You can waffle all day long about logic but this is about investor confidence and not the nuances of logic theory.

Showing proof is a very small step towards boosting confidence and Gardin recovering some credibility because right now he has little.

Mickydj: You post

" He keeps repeating the photo line, not because a photo proves anything regulatory, but because repetition creates suspicion."

Certainly a photo would prove Gardin/QBT were really at Nashville. After one month in which hardware appears not to be delivered and no photo evidence, suspicion is indeed created.

Why shouldn't a photo be posted there is nothing to hide ?

Why does Micky vehemently defend the company that does not defend itself ?

If Gardin wishes to sustain the share price for the benefit of all investors he needs to give credibility to the story he tells.

Photo at NEMS!!

Mickydj: You post

" That’s not presenting evidence, that’s encouraging doubt by repetition."

Of course it's not presenting evidence, what evidence would I be presenting ? Of course it represents doubt.

Gardin produces no evidence for virtually everything he claims. Why should anyone believe anything he publishes or says?

A photo is worth a hundred words !