Member Info for Phimx

And, still not a shred of evidence Gardin travelled to Nashville NEMS. No evidence Jose Rios attended nor Roland Bynoe. According to Gafdin they've been reduced to checking hardware powers up and all the bits are in the box.

In fact NEMS seems to have been a bit of a damp squib for the Bitcoin industry. How many times can one attended these shows and be bored witless.

And, still not a shred of evidence Gardin travelled to Nashville NEMS. No evidence Jose Rios attended nor Roland Bynoe. According to Gafdin they've been reduced to checking hardware powers up and all the bits are in the box.

In fact NEMS seems to have been a bit of a damp squib for the Bitcoin industry. How many times can one attended these shows and be bored witless.

Miker444:

To keep you straight at £7 for Greatland, your shares would be worth £3,850,000. If you made £4,000,000 you did exceedingly well. But foolishly you are trying to win the lottery a second time, that's not smart. Sit and reflect, you were exceptionally lucky. Don't think that you have a special gift, cut the gambling and enjoy.

Miker444; You post

" had 11m shares at 0.5p cost me £60k and I sold them at 38p. They are now £6 - £7 each. I made £4m would be £60m - £70m if I had held, but anyway it doesn't matter."

£70 million ? You seem to have ignored the 20 for 1 consolidation ?

Miker444: You post

"

Everyone can give their own estimates but seeing as we hit 4.5p on sentiment alone in the event of a deal with a Major then yes we will be in double figures, and then some."

And now investors are older and wiser, do you think sentiment will be the same ?

Ramp away dreamer

Miker444: You post

" For all those who will accuse me of ramping I say this, An Asic Chip Manufacturer is not going to give away its latest technology, Source Code, MDK Kit, to then walk away if it is successful. What would be the reason to hand it all over in the first place."

But that is 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 what Block/Proto are doing !!

And it's probably what Gardin is claiming his team have now and fluffing it up just for you.

Miker444: You post

" I don't need to explain anything to you when quoting a fact"

Of course you don't but if you are going to get involved in a discussion don't be too surprised if people want to discuss what you post.

We all make mistakes and petulance is another!

Miker444: You post

"I don't my little munchkin, I was answering Awl that PRN's have to pass the ASA strict guideline"

So, if I understand you correctly, you don't think PRNs are adverts but they have to pass ASA strict guidelines?

Could you explain, to my dead ant brain cell, why the ASA sets strict guidelines for something which is not advertising. You are truly a disciple of Gardin.

Mickydj: You post

" Repeating historical analogies doesn’t change the outcome either way"

Very true Micky but we are all trying to predict the eventual outcome! Whilst the past does not predict the future we don't really have much data to go on,to make our predictions, apart from past events and outcomes. It would be senseless to ignore the past.

The outcomes of past RNS(PRN) provide better probabilities than brute force guessing. After all, QBT's technology is based upon probabilities

Miker444:

You got me there, here's me thinking there wasn't much difference.

So why do you think PRNs are adverts?

Miker444:

I'm sure Shake and Vac adverts are quite removed from RNS disclosures. Of course with my dead ant IQ I could be wrong!

Miker444:

Why do you think RNS are adverts ?

Jam gathers mould if left too long - ancient Eskimo proverb!

Out of interest look at today's RNS from International Workplace Group Plc (IWG). The RNS, along with others, shows the buying schedule for 10 March, listing the individual purchases and quantities.

In line with other Buy-back schemes I've seen the buying pattern and quantities appear random even though the buy-back would be well known to investors.

Why would anyone advertise their intentions when buying large amounts of shares, it would cost them money!!

Investors don't advertise when buying large amounts of shares!

You are being lured in to buy the placing shares

This is where you get suckered people

Miker444:

So they ran out of money selling to lower the price and now they have to make a decision to buy back in at a higher price !

No wonder I've been losing money. Silly me I've been trying to buy at a low and sell when prices rose. What an idiot I've been

Miker444:

Whatever you say, unlike you I'm not a boilerroom expert. I thought you received money when you sold, I have it all wrong.

Miker444: You posted

" They are out of money to continue selling and now have to decide to buy back in at a higher price if they want to continue their day trading."

You said they were out of money, I'll think about that ! Hmm what does it mean when you are out of money ?

Got it .... you have no money, you are skint, broke, bereft of the readies, needing pie and mash ...etc

So how do you buy back the shares when you ain't got no Lady Godivas

Yanis: You post

" Today we’re seeing the opposite — steady accumulation"

I think you are suffering a serious case of Dyscalculia, see a statistician immediately!