RE: Mcap is peanuts, Volvo likes it10 Nov 2023 17:07
Deltalo:
I've already explained previously that the kW is simply heat. In-spirit simply state 97 kW, now think carefully, why are they not stating kW thermal or kW electric ? Why do they continue to write vague and ambiguous RNS.
If it was kWe they would be singing from the rooftops because that would really be good for refrigerated transport but they aren't, they want you to believe its kWe. Of course what good is huge amounts of heat to transport, perhaps in the artic circle you could pump 97 kW into cab and incinerate the driver! Vehicles already throw away heat because they have no use for it.
For Gensets on the other hand, that heat could be useful for building heating etc.But I'm sure CAT and others already do and I can't see In-spirit having any advantage over their research departments. When all said and done Paul Booker or John Gunn just don't have the ability.
Consider it from another angle, when did they develop a Stirling that can produce 97 kW of electricity. The answer is never, the only Stirling they have spent millions developing and years of Designing for Manufacture is the claimed 6.4 kWe. Now as has been claimed in a couple of RNS the Charger Stirling engine is 65% of the Volvo HHR system I.e. it is the Stirling used in the Volvo application. SO, I base what I write on what In-spirit write and not wild and desperate imagination in an attempt to recoup investment losses.
You are free to think and dream whatever you want but in terms of making money I'm sticking to reality investments.