Member Info for Pecten11

Sandy 'Is there a wiring fault?' :))))

Maybe he is realising that it's either take a loss or end up being a LTH.

If theres no more dilution (??) and he is patient, then it could be possible to escape without Ctrl,Alt,Delete

asimple, nice to see you've come round to quoting LME copper prices.

FigLeaf, I'm gonna guess the thread got deleted because of Joey's false accusation against me.....

FigLeaf, it sounds like your seeds are squeaking......

steward1 "Thought I was communicating with Sandy but Pecten11 pops up!"

Sandy's comments about the payment timeline were not addressed to you, but you chose to respond.
Its a discussion board - doh

So steward, you also took in good faith the RNS May3rd that said they would start processing the stockpile in Q2

Guess what? As you've acknowledged, they are late - they've missed previously announced guidance - again

So which is a more logical position to take when it comes to investing money - good faith or healthy skepticism?

Of course today's RNS should again raise the question of what the 'Other Project Revenues' were in the Q1 figs (with a contribution from Tadjikistan)
Obviously the project itself hasn't generated any revenue from processed ore, so where did the cash come from?
A signing on bonus? A brown envelope? In return for what?
VAST have ignored my questions about this, maybe someone else can get a detailed response - it is a public company after all

Fintech, have you been able to stop 'the voices' yet ?

Bridgedogg1 'It will be interesting to see what kind of numbers come out of this new project. I'm hoping for £50-£100k per month'

Based on what we've been told and assuming it translates into reality, then yes, broadly agree with those numbers.
As Sandy points out, will be good to get some transparency over payment terms/times

LuckyBear, at best it meh - already known info
At worst, it's an admission (without actually saying it) that they are behind schedule

So everyone is happy that the second mill line at Baita was commissioned 6 weeks ahead of schedule but when this update says production will start in Q3 (July) of the same two months stockpile that was meant to be processed in Q2?

Consistency guys - distraction guys

Sandy, how very dare you suggest I'm educated or capable of thinking - what a slur

I know my place - compared to the likes of Quant, Firwood and FigLeaf.......

Vaguely interesting use of 'we' there Quant, unless of course you are just referring to best bud Figleaf, as you seem to follow him around (QBT and CLP for example)
Or is it just another anonymous Telegram group of rampers?

Firwood, now that really is insulting
'personally I think your strategy is akin to mugging people'

So when you stay silent, when the rampers are talking 5p, 10p, 20p etc or posting factually incorrect information, what are they doing? What are you doing by your silence?

Possibly a little over the top but think Edmund Burke 'The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing'

Firwood, if that's your strategy then good luck with it.

However, I'm not twisting anything. My point if view and consequent posting has been consistent (unless associated news has indicated a rethink is necessary) - to suggest any 'script' may be your opinion, but is entirely wrong. As I said , anyone can read my posting history (or yours) and see who has been consistent

So would you describe yourself as an investor or a trader Firwood?

Afterall, you 'invested' at the start of a long fall in SP post consolidation (iirc 9p ish), which apparently you rescued with some brave averaging down before last months spike allowing you to trade out.

PS - anyone can look at my or Sandy's posting history to see your claim of 'their system is to bash while it’s level or falling then they go quiet and sell into the rise,' is factually wrong - I think we've both been pretty consistent with our POVs
You didn't like facts during the SP decline and now you try to rewrite history.......

Quant, is that the same FigLeaf who, as a proven paragon of accuracy (lol) has on at least two occasions (even after his mistake had been pointed out), claimed that VASTs assets were worth $1bn, when he should have actually been referring to Ro?ia Poieni?
Should that have been allowed to go unchallenged?

Quant, you say 'we should look at both the positives and the negatives'

But at 11.43 in your scornful reply to Sandy, you said 'Naysayers are here for a reason'

So which is it?

Quant, I wouldn't dream to speak for Sandy,as I'm sure he'll correct me, however, it's less to do with an obsession about the share price, it's more to do with proof of progress and the closing of the belief gap that VAST will become profitable at the topco level.
I think we've both acknowledged positive moves ( the rigs and the second mill line fall into that category) but we've both seen that transparency has been, and continues to be an issue. Anyone who chooses to only see positives and ignore challenges and tries to sucker others in with that attitude is foolish and dangerous imo

Quant, I wouldn't dream to speak for Sandy,as I'm sure he'll correct me, however, it's less to do with an obsession about the share price, it's more to do with proof of progress and the closing of the belief gap that VAST will become profitable at the topco level.
I think we've both acknowledged positive moves ( the rigs and the second mill line fall into that category) but we've both seen that transparency has been, and continues to be an issue. Anyone who chooses to only see positives and ignore challenges and tries to sucker others in with that attitude is foolish and dangerous imo