Member Info for Pecten11

TopGun 'However it must be their intention to offload at a profit above the placing price of course.'

I'm sure that would have been the plan and I'm not saying this is the case (as I wasnt a placee) but with the copper price and markets generally moving south, they may think cash now is better than waiting for a commodity price recovery.

All of this hot air for £20 grand total transactions (buy/sell)

Mag and maid, the Bill and Ben of the INSP board

'but no sellers here now - that the main point'

There are no buyers either.........

Has anyone from INSP ever been interviewed on record - and I dont just mean a fluff PR piece but someone who would drill down into their claims - CRUX maybe?
If not, why not?
If, as the rampers claim, they have some sought of breakthrough, wouldn't they be shouting from the rooftops?

Mags, 15 minutes delayed

Vol Sold 20,625,176
Vol Bought 9,640,355

Mags, just for you

Vol Sold 15,502,003
Vol Bought 9,639,355

Mag, I'm starting a company selling magic carpets - I cant tell you how they work but I promise you, they fly
How many shares shall I put you down for?

Xcoder, I understand that, but others were again trying to suggest something false, so was trying to make it clear again

Xcoder and anyone else who wants to try and suggest I'm the same poster as SandyShore - email admin to check. I've no problem with someone who takes a positive POV but they should be able to argue the point rather than just try and dismiss the poster

I reported Joey a few days ago for suggesting the same thing and asked admin to verify this wasnt the case- guess what, they deleted the thread containing the allegation because it wasnt true.
The ramping rabbits dont like it when factual posts are made so try spinning a false story

StockAl - you know as well as I do that the Q2 results (probably first week in August) will be modest - if they are double Q1 they will have done well - but not well enough

Tajikistan wont start any processing until Q3
The long hole stopping and use if remote loader at Baita are only starting in Q3
VAST have told you this, yet you still want to convince others that Q2 will be good - why?

uNknown - thanks for that.
Might be six months out of date but strongly suggests that free float is a massive % of admitted shares

Which also directly implies that Sharebel is - wrong

Alan, the only information I can find suggests he is very wrong and free float would be 75% plus of admitted shares.

I was giving him a chance to show where he gets his information from in case mine is out if date.
Nothing more dangerous than just assuming what you read to be true

Sharebel, I see you again claiming a small free float - can you provide a link to the INSP shareholder list or whatever other source you use.

Surely you can back up this claim with verifiable information??

'bashers running out of ammo - imho'

Rampers have run out of evidence and supporters

Unfortunately this has been a prime case of differentiating between actually reading the words of RNSs and reading how people want to interpret an RNS
This doesnt just apply here, but to all announcements.

If it isnt said explicitly, it hasn't been said at all

Rampers claiming to read between the lines but unable to back up their opinion with any verifiable information are dangerous to your wealth

Onaplate, it's a shame cos I'm genuinely interested
You see so much posted on bbs about short and long term (with the odd medium) but the terms will have different meanings to different people
Personally I see short term as two to six months
Medium as being 6 to 18 months
Long term past there
Didn't mention 1 month as thought the 'i ' word to be inappropriate here

How short is your 'short term' Joey?

A week?
A month?
3 months?
6 months?
A year?
Longer?

Have I missed the statement that declares the Moly processing is now active - was meant to happen before end Q2?

The flotation tanks have been refurbished but to comms to say they are actually being used to produce concentrate?

Water vapour may act as an amplifier to the effect of other greenhouse gases, so logically if the amount of those gases is reduced (by using hydrogen rather than a fossil fuel) that amplification effect will be reduced

From the 12th April RNS
'The cash raised from the Subscription will be used to primarily acquire additional mechanised equipment to increase underground production at Baita, namely an Aramine miniLoader L130D with remote control capability (‘miniLoader’). The cash raised from the Subscription will also be used to fund logistics costs in relation to the miniLoader as well as increased transportation costs of the two Mantis CMR4 Jumbo drilling rigs to ensure delivery in April 2022 via airfreight'

So part if that £420k was to pay for airfreight to ensure delivery in April - was there any notification that the plan had changed or did the money get spent elsewhere?
- an example of why not to purely take things on good faith but to understand and acknowledge that timelines and costs have a record of - what's a polite way of putting it - slipping