MF1 Mar 2022 14:10
I've been mulling over my frustrations with Mr Frayne recently, comparing him to other natural resource CEOs on AIM. I also noted that yesterday on twitter the infamous Doc H voiced his disappointment, describing MF as decidedly average.
There are certainly times I wish he was more visible as our CEO and regular in his communication with us as to what's going on. But then I look as some CEOs that seem to live on twitter/podcasts and their constant hype and repeating the same thing over and over again simply puts me off.
I love the Natural Resource space, having grown up in Oil and worked in the industry in many capacities and geographies it's a sector I love and I love the passion of the real get-the-hands-dirty brigade, rather than the swarm of accountant-like individuals sitting in Surrey with tenements in far flung destinations.
I'm attracted to companies with resources, cash in the bank (hopefully) and low valuations probably as yet unrecognised by the market - this probably means I get in too early but at least ahead of the herd (and I think that describes all the shareholders here). I've lost enough on wildcat junior exploration types, where really it's nothing more than roulette and I won't go down that route again unless they already have some sort of resource in the bag.
SO back to Mr Frayne. In hindsight, do I wish he communicated more - probably. BUT I'm glad he isn't constantly hyping the story, especially given the history of self-imposed deadlines being missed. IN all honesty he probably feels obliged to be conservatively optimistic when interviewed and I'm sure he doesn't do it to mislead but genuinely believes those deadlines can be met.
I believe he's worth listening to, the story is good, it's a quality asset and quality will shine through in a sector of hype, dreams and in most cases no defined resource.
I belief we're on the cusp. February was disappointing, but March... (he said hopefully)