Member Info for parkez

I'm holding a decent amount, it will become apparent eventually just what Cap-xx have.

I WILL be here when that happens.

I might see things differently to some.

I see this as confirmation that the SMD is now a viable product.

This mou is not about our current products but what's just been developed.

Expecting licence agreements after this endorsement.

I might see things diff

"SCHURTER also offers services for the electronics industry in the field of the printed circuit board assembly."

Manufactured by Cap-xx sent white label to Schurter who stick their name on it and sell.

Major endorsement of Cap-xx...however nothing added to cash inflow for at least 12months...imo.

Just hope Cap-xx will not be selling to Schurter at a loss?

Again we are guessing...

"CAP-XX has also granted SCHURTER exclusive rights to brand label and distribute CAP-XX's supercapacitor products within SCHURTER's electromechanical markets for a binding period (the "Exclusivity Right").

Surely this is the SMD?

I have no doubt this is why Dr GC is now here.

Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/CPX/cap-xx-finalises-two-new-patents-ipsze0o2b8wtntj.html

This informs the market.

Is more required?

It was published 6th June 24, so been public knowledge (supposedly) since then.

I've been looking on and off but only found it today.

So who knows....

Yes it goes way over my head too.

I put it on here hoping for some feed back and correction as needed

I know it's boring to read and believe me boring to research...I have to just grab little snickers of info I'm hoping I understand.

BUT this is potentially big big news, just hope I'm reading it right.

Okay, point taken.

Happy to keep it to myself.

However, the CMC binder is usually used together with styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR), another kind of binder to get a better performance.

No mention of a comparison against the actual combined cmc+sbr performance?

Wonder how it compares to that?

Patent today showing excellent results against the standard aqueous binder (cmc).

Just read this ....does it put a dampener on it?

Another kind of binder that is commonly used in commercial lithium ion batteries is the sodium salt of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). The greatest advantage of CMC is that it allows processing of electrode slurries with water solvent rather than with polluting, environmentally unfriendly, volatile organic compound-based solvents. Moreover, this kind of water-soluble binder is cheap and easy to dispose at the end of the battery life, thus definitely leading to cheaper and greener electrode processing [15]. Due to its apparent advantages, the applications of CMC as the binders in lithium ion batteries have been reported frequently [9], [16]. However, the CMC binder is usually used together with styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR), another kind of binder to get a better performance.

Https://www.fool.com/investing/stock-market/market-sectors/information-technology/ai-stocks/ai-in-investing/#:~:text=Is%20it%20legal%20to%20use,as%20some%20investors%20might%20think.

"the ESR rise is much slower using PSS as a binder compared to using CMC, and the capacitance is lost more slowly. The PSS capacitors performed better after 600 hours than the CMC capacitors performed at 50 hours."

Https://www.skeletontech.com/skeleton-blog/why-does-esr-matter

Of course I don't understand most of it...

But this sounds good!

some embodiments, the salts of sulfonated polymers described herein are soluble in water, which allows environmentally friendlier aqueous processing to be used to produce electrode active layers.

This is a game changer for supercaps and batteries...

Of course just my very humble opinion.

ESR and capacitance of the supercapacitor was tested by regular discharge measurements (see Figs. 1 and 2). As evidenced by these data, the ESR rise is much slower using PSS as a binder compared to using CMC, and the capacitance is lost more slowly. The PSS capacitors performed better after 600 hours than the CMC capacitors performed at 50 hours.

CMC is the standard binder in most supercaps and batteries.

0057] Although certain sulfonated polymers are known for their ionic character and therefore have found use to date in charge transfer or membrane applications, the present inventors are the first to discover their utility as binders, particularly in composite electrodes useful in energy conversion and storage devices. The unexpected properties of salts of sulfonated polymers in this particular application in the form of superior dispersion characteristics in aqueous electrode active material mixtures, as well as beneficial effects in terms of lowered ESR and reduced gas production compared to standard binders in the art, were previously completely unappreciated. [

Https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2024113027A1/en?assignee=Cap-xx&oq=Cap-xx&page=2&peid=61d483e941598%3A282%3Af811af7f

The patent for the polymer binding system has been published.

Here's an extract....

Read and understand....

The present inventors have discovered that salts of sulfonated polymers have particular utility as binders in electrode active layers. Moreover, when used as binders, the ESR rise in otherwise equivalent devices is significantly lower using salts of sulfonated polymers than when the standard binder CMC is used.