Member Info for parkez

Everything is done for a reason.

3% or 5%...does it matter?

Who knows...

An investor who acquires, exceeds or falls below 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10% and each 1% threshold thereafter up to 100%

Seems clear to me?

Okay,

It's been posted with proof that's it's 3%.

Those that think it's 5%...where's some evidence...please.

"That is immaterial"

Seems a little strange ....

An investor is an investor...

Okay get your point, Schurter being foreign then it's 5%.

But they are buying a uk listed company?

As I said earlier...is the threshold 3% or 5%?

My research has says 3%.

But always happy to be corrected.

Let's just clear this up.

It's not upto Schurter to issue a TR1...

They inform the company of their holdings and the company issues the TR1.

SO WHY have Cap-xx decided to inform the market this way?

I wonder if it's the section that says previous holdings.

Did they take part in the recent placing?

How long does a MOU take to establish?

If you were planning a full buyout, funding a placement kind of defeats the object of accumulation before offer.

Is it 3% or 5% threshold with Cap-xx?

It's been pointed out on the other bb this is not a TR1.

Why would that be?

Consistently calling it a new product?

In new product development, Cap-XX said it continues to advance new products such as DMH, 3V and SMD.

It said the DMH product samples are on track for delivery by the end of the year, with commercial production expected to commence in early 2024. First orders are already in hand, Cap-XX said, with several other customers evaluating the product.

CAP-XX has been commissioning a new production line for the manufacture of very thin supercapacitors that are less than 500 microns thick. This new product, branded the DMH series and measuring 20mm x 20mm x 0.4mm, is far thinner than any other supercapacitor currently available on the market. The DMH supercapacitor will be a unique offering to customers, providing a thin form factor whilst maintaining extremely high-power performance. The DMH cells connected in series can provide a peak current of 5 amps with an operating voltage of 4.2V, a significant power output for such a small device. There are significant market opportunities for the DMH product in applications such as smart cards and wearable devices, where a thin form factor is a crucial requirement.

New product line?

Not really sure whether it is or isn't!

New DMH product soon to hit the market.

So what's the difference between the new and old DMH?

Is this the first new product with the new binder system?

"Substantial benefits"

"Real added value"

Wonder what products they have planned?

Don't know if it's been posted before?

https://www.schurter.com/en/news/cap-xx-and-schurter

First person ever I have filtered...

I suggest.others do the same, he's only here to disrupt.

Don't feed him.

All the answers are in the aqueous polymer binding system patent.

Just be patient...

Https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cmc-binder-lithium-ion-batteries-market-research-report-ew8de

Just saying!

Mobile phones is about cost and ease of manufacture.

The SMD is a game changer and mobiles will be the reason it's licenced.

Imo of course.