Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
https://polaris.brighterir.com/public/crystal_amber/news/rns/story/xzn5e3x
And this morning he just bought 125000 shares in crs!
Yes he would be responsible. I would say it’s insignificant. He has no liquid cash so in order to facilitate the policy of buying back his own shares he needs to sell elsewhere.
Bit of a bonkers share this one. I’m now out for a bag. Good luck all holders
Agreed ! I believe it would absolutely fly. Everyone should be messaging Joe Pignato this ! I can’t understand why crs have not pushed for it either. Bernstein is under pressure with his failing fund, the only buyer of crs stock is crs, investco have sold their entire stake now in crs(20%) and 2 “activist” funds taking up their position. So you have an activist fund being targeted by activist funds ! You could not make it up. Richard Bernstein the inactive activist !
There is no new update. Snaffle posted it earlier. Here is a new article re Nokia bridgecomm
https://www.bizjournals.com/denver/news/2020/10/08/bridgecomm-partnership-nokia-5g-technology.html
Yes I see that now.
Where do you see these phrases echo ? I have not read that ?
https://www.5gradar.com/news/nokia-turns-to-bridgecomm-to-deliver-100gbps-5g-throughput-via-owc
It’s worth a punt now for sure. I’ve had a crack
The ONC market is expected to worth $27 billion by 2024 rising to 40 by 2030. Bridgecomm must also benefit from the trade war subsidies for American companies.
$8.25
Meeeoow.
In all seriousness though volume is good with some chunky buys. Alm need spin to come up trumps to not be a one trick pony. First to market will be key. If spin comes in then this share is £1.50 + all day long. Gla
Rumours of nvidia taking out Arm. Spin could also be a target ??
Only 10% free float.
Consider that 80.5% of the shares are held by institutions. I know of another 10% or so which are held tight by pi’s as the current sp owes them a lot more. That leaves just 10% on free float so when this goes on the back of a good piece of news it should fly. Gla
I suspect a cfd transfer from amber to inter. Therefore Amber have not really reduced. I wonder where the other % has come from. Also noticed today a new major holder “bank of butterfield “ with a little over 10%. This is yet to be announced by Alm. Again I can’t see where these shares came from either but suspect from Perpetual.
The market would then value the subsidiaries. Let’s say Fed and Spin were floated you could then get a percentage of those companies dependant on your ALM holding. Should you choose to sell then any profit would be subject to capital gains rather than income tax from a special divy.
This really is the best play for Alm. See my earlier post regarding it. I also truly believe this would get maximum value for the share and you can then pick and choose which sub you want to roll with and sell out of the others.
I doubt the board would want to go for it however. It would have to be pushed by shareholders. Floating on the NAS would negate the need for them and they would therefore not be on the very cushty remuneration package they currently have.