Member Info for ontarget

So after all that panic selling we close at only 1.85% down. Well done to those who managed to top up on the cheap!

Definitely a few large buys to be shown later as MMs moved onto the bid at 15:16 and again at 16:03, with no visible reason on the live trades.

At the GEO AGM the CEO also mentioned there had been some lab consolidations/mergers which have slowed things down as well.

I don't think any company is withholding their assay results M_J - what would be the point as they'd have to release them eventually anyway?

The real reason, that particularly affects those two you mentioned is that the assay labs in Australia are extremely busy now due to the high gold price, as every man and his dog is drilling for the stuff. Just continue to be patient.

From Zeus note on this morning's news:

"We see the calculation of a new Mineral Resource Estimate and new economic study as a major catalyst for revaluation. Strategic is funded for

these and aims for completion of these critical steps in Q1 2026. We intend to review our fair value on publication of these key updates."

GSCU is working at much shallower depths and an eventual mine would likely be open pit. Redmoor will be an underground mine, but 400-500m depths are nothing. You do realise there are mines that are kilometres deep. Regarding intercepts again no issue there you need to research the SVS (sheeted vein system to understand - the veins might be look quite narrow (although they have reported some over 16m today) but they are packed together into almost a horizontal sheet.

Anyway not sure why everyone is discussing SML on the GSCU board, I only mentioned it to reply to Rob1967 about the copper grades that he commented on earlier. It's not a competition between stocks.

6 drill holes to come, not 5.

They drilled 9, we've had 3. 9 minus 3 is 6.

Shut up napthman, you know nothing about SML.

Punting £500 here like usual or have you pushed the boat out and gone for £600?

Added significantly this morning at just above the placing price.

Btw SML primary focus is the tungsten which is very high grade globally, the Cu/Ag there is just a bonus on top and not the main event like here.

Completely wrong, it affects every measure of value of CRL.

Go raid somewhere else.

It is not usual for a company to change it's annual guidance a few weeks before the end of the year. They have told us the average is 41,400 with a few weeks left so what would be the purpose of changing the guidance? Nothing fishy whatsoever.

The shorts will want to hedge, or partially or fully close out their position before the flowtest results start coming out imo, to take their profits and control the risk. This obviously requires them buying shares and to do so will need others to sell at a favourable price for them.

So it's no surprise to me that we have several suspiciously new posters turning up posting negative cr@p. Every PI panic sell however small is a bit of their short covering taken care of.

Usual rubbish that gets put out near the bottom while the big boys load up. They don't want the gullible masses getting in until much later.

I have the gap close @20.35 but the lowest price hit today was 20.45 - does that count as filled? Maybe so as it's basically one tick off.

Interesting that virtually all (all but one I think) of the delayed trades today were buys, including some chunky 1m+ ones. Hopefully that means we've shaken off those interesting in selling at this level and can move on up.

The call option expires 18/12, so we should get news that it's either been exercised or extended by then.

That's also a buy

The time on the trade is 16:39:06, which probably means it was filled during the day. It's impossible to know if it was a 'buy' or 'sell', although to be honest it's irrelevant.

Cloudbay that is

Think you’re confusing NPV with in-ground value.