Member Info for observer842

;-)

Indeed @casey. I'm wondering if it's not just @couts that believes that a "huge outfit like WH Ireland" couldn't *possibly* make a glaring error with regard to our 30% Yangibana asset, since the market appears to have discounted its contribution to the share price to practically zero... We are all only human you know. Mistakes happen. I *know* I'm right on this one. No ifs, no buts, no caveats. They made a mistake.

@couts. Would you like me to show you the error they made? It was glaring - but it wasn't their fault... ;-)

@couts. Simple question. Do you believe WH Ireland made a mistake with the Yangibana valuation to REM?

Blimey! Tomorrow's a bit optimistic @couts. But yes, this is good news for REM, and if our BoD are able to play the cards right, ballistic is certainly on the cards! Don't come crying with, but this, and I thought that. It's laid out in black and white: WHI Ireland made a mistake - it the market can't see that then it only has itself to blame. I've tried to spell it out as best I can - but if the market won't listen what can I do but take advantage of that? It's a strong buy from me... ;-)

The market might be assuming the worst for Yangibana due to the WHIreland mistake for not spotting the table header correction and then having to extend the mining dates by several years for our JV to make the numbers work. Yangibana North (our JV) is due to be mined from years 4 to 7 according to the ERD document - which is great news now it appears to be actually going to happen! Hurry up and someone spill the beans so I can start quoting properly! ;-)

Only pulling your leg @Barksy - I'm sure all serious investors here have figured out what has been published, but not yet "announced" by now...

Barksy! You've made it too easy to find out what we are talking about... ;-)

Not sure @tomcat. There certainly appears to be "something" at play here. Corporate shenanigans I wonder...?

Indeed @tomcat. A fascinating read. But lots of it! ;-)

Come on @couts - earn your wings. What are @tomcat and I looking at and why is it potentially v good for REM? ;-)

@tomcat: the "a pipelinea road"'s we initially objected to: http://tenementcache.landtrack.com.au/L09-66 http://tenementcache.landtrack.com.au/L09-75

Page 19... Next to: http://tenementcache.landtrack.com.au/L09-80 Do I pass? ;-) I wonder if this is tedious or intriguing for everyone else? I think I'd find it fun and try to figure it out what the heck we are talking about!? ;-)

;-) Search for 2026 in the document and you'll figure it out.

I understand @tomcat. I appreciate the tips. Did you see in the LandTrack pages that we initially objected to the location of some of the roads? I wonder why?

If anyone else is following up on @tomcat's tip (cheers!) - this might come in useful: http://www.hastingstechmetals.com/images/projects/Yangibana-project-2.jpg Problem is - I already know REM is a strong buy. Not sure why you are reluctant to share on here... I found it easily enough given your hints so I guess it's already public knowledge if google has seen it...? Surely we should be trying to get new people to invest here by demonstrating that our assets appear to be on track to production - and that our current market cap is demonstrably very likely significantly undervalued - for reasons unknown to us. Perhaps a change of name might help as we are possibly being overlooked by new blood to the Lithium sector...? But knowing our luck, the minute we change to include lithium in our name, rare earth's will spike! @tomcat: proof we talking about the same thing: ECD: 2026. Apologies everyone else - this is what happens when I won't join the bunker, me and @tomcat have to resort to talking in tongues in the open... ;-)

Worth reposting this from yesterday, but with a few more quotes this time for those who haven't the time to read the full article... (which is highly recommended!) "The US rare earth vulnerability and mammoth battery supply disconnect" (February 02, 2017) https://investorintel.com/sectors/technology-metals/technology-metals-intel/us-vulnerability-mammoth-battery-disconnect-rare-earth-supply/ === The most startling act of cognitive dissonance in the mining space in this day and age is amongst those investors and analysts that enthuse about Lithium, Cobalt, Graphite and yet cannot raise an eyebrow for Rare Earths. The thesis is rather simple. If you believe that we are on the cusp (or indeed already in) of a massive surge in adoption of EVs and HEVs and therefore the batteries for these vehicles (primarily the Li-Ion battery format) will rule the Earth then how can one not also posit that the type of engine that dominates the same vehicles will have a proportionate need for the Rare Earth magnets produced from Neodymium and Praseodymium. If one is disturbed by potential shortages of Lithium and Cobalt, then why no sleepless nights about Rare Earths? ... The clear inconsistency between thinking that EVs and HEVs are the way forward, and yet that REEs are “not important” or “crisis averted”, is the great fallacy of our times. If one feels that Lithium, Cobalt and other battery metals are in critical short supply then the situation is worse in REEs where future sources of production (even in China) are unclear to say the least. ===

So at today's share price, would you say REM is undervalued or overvalued, or neither? I'm calling it massively undervalued. Which means it's a strong buy from me! Never forget that sentiment can, and does, turn on a coin...

Just in case anyone is truly concerned about this new battery development - the paper is mostly about lithium metal. Sodium can be used, but it will almost certainly result in a slightly larger/heavier battery than the equivalent lithium based one for a given energy storage capability. They don't say by how much though. The only real advantage sodium has going for it over lithium is that it is cheaper. Of course investors in graphite etc might need to worry... "Alternative strategy for a safe rechargeable battery" (First published online 09 Dec 2016) http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2017/EE/C6EE02888H#!divAbstract === The result is a safe, low-cost, lithium or sodium rechargeable battery of high energy density and long cycle life. ===

Hey! I said "A coiled spring I tells you!" @01:17 - surely that counts as today!?