RE: Top up added!20 Jan 2021 13:18
That PIs want to talk up their investment is fair and to be expected, and actually good to see on this BB. There was some interesting chart analysis on regarding the great sp performance last year a couple of days ago aside which did make me wince though. However we have to be clear what we mean by cutting LR some slack.
When LR took over there was 321,218,279 shares in circulation, now there is over 721m. This is completely ignoring the options which have grown to 64m. As the focus has been on market capitalisation rather than sp performance this has meant that although revenue has grown the sp has reduced from the point that LR took over (circa 16p) in line with the level of share dilution. That is also fine depending on what the ultimate strategy is. For example if it is T/O then when, at what price or if it is to grow organically then when break even can be expected? Obviously PIs are unaware of this and hence why some have struggled to maintain confidence and enthusiasm here. Whereas as we have seen in the recent share purchases and placings, those closer to the Company have increased their holdings at higher sp levels. The problem here is Free Float and market volume which lags behind due to the communication on lack of commercialisation detail. Once again one only has to look at some of the posting threads from this morning to just see how difficult it is to find information, even for LTHs.
Although it is appreciated that there are some markets which still have to be identified we also need to be aware that an incredible amount of slack has been given already. Take for example the IONA Nx...This began its journey in Sep 2018 with a £2.5million placing to fund its development and settle the litigation with Illumina. Last Spring the IONA Nx was developed, received its CE Mark in June and commercially launched in September. We however still do not know how readily available it is within the US, nor whether this is FDA or RUO only approved. This is quite amazing not only because of the litigation pain but also that the Patent Pool commercialisation is strategically important as it is exempt from loan repayments to Thermo Fisher.
I deliberately did not raise the Clarigene Test before where the comparison to Novacyt's PCR test is more stark. I only do so now to illustrate the difference in approaches. Novacyt received their FDA Emergency Use Authorization for their COVID-19 test in March following CE accreditation in February. Here PIs are still unclear on whether this remains a target for YGEN. I suspect not and this could have legitimate reasons such as marketing costs.
Hopefully the above illustrates some examples of the patience given here by PIs. I suspect however that this patience has run its length among some PIs
GLA to LTHs