Member Info for NikeAir180

Re. 16:20/25: By contrast, the 11:47 post by Banbury contains three sentences following an unsupported assumption, those three sentences were also also predictions and were formulated as such.

Rhetoric, within a conversation, rhetorcal question with figure of 5 million tonnes is also not a prediction, nor was consideration of gold production - if, could and if enough equipment had arrived and if production had started by such a time - which was clearly before either and again not a prediction.

17:03 post opened with "So do we get" then considered "Three potential RNS" the question and context of potential is not the same as prediction - following from the RRR rns of 24/01/25 which discussed the meeting of 22/01/25. Events took place over the weekend which I became aware of on 26/01/25 and those events were reported on major news outlets.

Context... further weakens Banbury's false post at 15:30.

24th January 2025 post at 17:03 is why...

15:30 - false post.

At 11:47.

Noting it was actually "amount of lies" and the other aspect was expreesd as "to lie here constantly" - relevant ammendment to 23:52 and 23:25.

As said, the above aspersion, particularly with regard to "constantly" is untrue after reading today's posts.

The post on a previous thread at 23:25 details falsification of one of Blueboy1975's posts relating to the interview on 15/01/22 and what was actually said by Bell. Blueboy1975 has made some other comments which have been falsified by myself.

As I said, the accusation towards Helpful of "constant lies" is clearly untrue after reading today's posts.

Re. 10:43, 24/01/25: I falsified Blueboy1975's post from 22:13, 23/01/25.

There have been various posts of Blueboy1975 that were falsifiable and have been falsified by myself.

Now, it would be nice to have some gokd production... an example of something that is not a lie but has not hapoened so far is a volume of gold production which had the conditional of if - if equipment has arrived, if production starts by such a time etc, plans changed so the if which was not a will or shall has not happened and when things changed, the facts of how and what equipment was going to arrive, there were no longer the same similar imagining of what might be possible as per Helpful - gold production, i don't regard that as a lie and, in any case just from today's posts we can see it is false comment to accuse him of "constant lies".

Re. 14:39: Alcholol is a drug.

Internal contradiction to Banbury's post at 13:30.

In the annual report from last year it was stated, with regard to realising value from at least one of the assets - gold production is a current priority. Has anything started yet? Is it near? is there a plan? Is there a clever adaptation, change of plan which could also realise value from the asset?

RRR has a few other gold assets and apart from the copper / cobalt saga, that commodity and RRR exposure such as it is - has been one of other main sources of RNS topics over the past eleven months.

This quarter or this year, will RRR dance around the clock?

Re. 05:43 - 2010 half-year report alluded to, actually mentioned a 258% share rise. As said, looked like there was a 500% share rise within the whole year of 2010 for that company.

... appreciate Watson may well have been a leader as well, Bell wrote chairman's statement in the 2010 annual report of both copmpanies.

Found a 2006 Proactive Investor article about a manganese Zambia project - don't know how it worked out but it referred to Bell as the CEO of both RRR and Regency Mines. Have read annaul report of Regence Mines from several years ago where Bell was CEO and Chairman so was then clearly the boss.

This is a long way of countering Theeeduke when he said Watson was solely responsible for RRR profits in 2010, I think Bell contributed to those profits. If at times Regency Mines was the largest shareholder in RRR and if that sometimes overlapped with Bell leading Regency Mines, well done.

Well aware Regency Mines had ups and downs so not happy clappy, don't know that much about it / Corcel just I think that detraction on 2010 by a differing view -actually through further reading leads me to more positivity to that good year for the company and its leadership.

IFK (abbreviating...) has posted - pretty sure in one of his posts he mentioned Bell doung well with RRR and Regency Mines in 2010. IFK has had a few previous nicknames, generally an amusing variation on positivity, has previously posted on RRR, I think it likely he was aware of their success in 2010/11.

As said before RRR did well in 2010 and 2011, the latter half of 2010 saw a share price that went from 1.77p to 14.25p, the annual report of 2011 referenced pre-tax profits up to 30th june that year of approximately 14illion pounds.

Regency Mines had a good year in 2010 with a 500% share price rise within that calendar year from what I saw. I could only fully securely access tge half-year report of 2010 which mentioned a 25%share price rise but as said did briefly notice something for thatbyear mentioning a 500% rise.

Thrpughout the xalebdar yeae of 2010 RRR's approximsre range was 1p to 14p.

The point of the post is that it looks to me like Bell was the boss of Regency Mines back then. So if Regency Mines via their investment in RRR contributed to RRR doing well, appreciate

Something can be unintentionally funny, causing a natural chuckle following a quip but the thought that it could be intentionally funny... : )

Anyway, I was thinking wooden boats and relaxing in a top quality tree house.

You have often been quite funny...

21:34... the tea has cooled during the clarification. : )

Re. 21:19... within the block capitals I was referring to: ... announces agreement to acquire land rights...

The above is an accurate extraction, relevant to the headed RNS referencing Katanga Mining i.e. the subject heading of the RNS...

Clarificaion in case an imperfect nemory was was also technically incorrect at 21:19.

Re. 19:30: Zumore regarding the first part of that post, just observational considerations by me that you have addressed your question to, not enough verification from the RNS as to the specifics, to know what was being referred to in the 20/12/19 RNS, involving companies other than RRR.

To the second part of your post: Kamoto Copper was the 75% subsidiary of Katanga Mining. The Glencore RNS from 20/12/19 which you re-posted yesterday, via the link, headed that RNS in block capitals referencing Katanga Mining acquiring land...

Katanga Mining was acquired by Glencore in 2020.

I found both the RRR rns' of 06/01/22 and 06/03/19 easier to fully concentrate on.

Am not sure about that word, pumpky. I don't know the future. Some of the future past will be interesting one day.