Member Info for NikeAir180

Am not sure about that word, pumpky. I don't know the future. Some of the future past will be interesting one day.

18:03.... 20th december 2019, RNS. (have reminded myself the day)

As I did say before to Zumore, no way to know for certain what specific of interest or not, that december 2019 link RNS was about, or not about and I can't rember any mention of VUP in that 20 december 2019 RNS from Glencore, so I don't know if it is relevant to Zumore trying to negate Helpful.

There have been various changes and developments in the last few years, sometimes people and attitudes change. Sometimes knowledge improves during the passing of time, sometimes it does not.

Re. 20:43 14/02/24, Zumore:

Katanga Mining was referred to in that Glencore RNS from December 2019. Katanga Mining on 22nd April 2020 announced that Glencore would be acquiring their shares. In the Glencore RNS throm the link from Zumore, it is the final paragraph which perhaps makes it understandable why that was a Glencore RNS.

As well as the 06/01/2022 RRR rns, the RRR rns of 06th March 2019 re. Copper / Cobal project is interesting in its entirety. There is no mention of the joint venture company detailed in the 06/03/19 RNS in the Glencore RNS from the Zumore link - de

Zumore, I am not outraged as per your 21:22 comment from yesterday and even though, acknowledging you were referring to many - on that one - I doubt you know what you claimed.

Re. 10:02, not sure he put in those words, he probably respects the boots.

I think 11:27 by Banbury is literally untrue.

Re. 15:47: with a nod to 29/01/25 RNS "...remain until concluded" - concluded - something resolved or answered - no mention of cash, wrong to say anyone relevant said they are not coming comming home without, no-one relevant said that. Hppefully thete wiill be a conclusion that is regarded as a positive, we know what some of the aim of that is but a conclusion is not always positive, he is no way bound by attempting to stay on for the conclustion "expect" is not a guarantee of remaining for the conclusion. If Bell is spending most of the monday to friday periods there, I don't think he has meaningfully left compared to what he said in the RNS. If that is the case, we don't entirely know yet and I'm really not that interested but bearing in mind 09:48 post, any dispute of what that means might be like a dispute of the contextual versus the analytic, I would side with the contextual on that one (a debate regarding meaning from philosphy of language) but I think it is potentially a pointless difference, here.

There is a factual citation via quotation from Zumore, in the 18:51 post, of "third party" and that is from the relevant 06th January 2022. I do not know what the conclusion of that RNS refers to beyond the words themselves but the 06/01/22 RNS was an interesting re-read.

Perhaps Zumore of 19:34, Helpful was being rhetorical range bound in the last passage you quoted from, given the context of his reply. Perhaps the actual point, ironically put - was that thousands of tonnes of spodumene might be quite interesting and what followed was more of the humour, containing a little bit of sarcasm.

Re. 15:53: Equipment was detailed as having arrived in Ougadougou as per 18/12/24 RNS and that was not in italics.

The first fourteen words of Banbury's final sentence at 15:53 is as false as what he said at 07:12.

There is the reputation of "the coming weeks" and the reputation of recent years. So far one is without communicated evidence, for the other - there has been various communicated evidence.

Back to my mug of tea, another one.

Gold: $2920.90 - at a moment between Dukey's nutshell and this post.

Re. 09:04: One would assume you don't want to be taken literally with this post Banbury, in case it did work.

By the way in the field of conjecture, I don't think he knows more than the rest of us. On anything that he could potentially know more than the rest of us, he knows the rules. Reading all of this share chat, I don't know anthing more than RNS' comments, video intervies and public comments.

My advice to myself is chill out and have a mug of tea.

Cheers : )

Second section of Banbury's 09:01 post is false. Helpful has never advised anyone to buy or sell RRR shares all the time I have been reading his posts. If Dukey buys and then wants to have a go at a poster aftewerwards (I think he already does) that is a tactical decision. I am not condoning anyone "having a go" at anyone else... fair challenge, reasonable difference of opinion is part of the manners of debate.

Banbury - you have actually given buying and selling advice with this share at different prices.

28/03/24 half-year report, ChaIrman's statement refers to the start of lithium operations, sales not concluded, current stockipile is in Beira and Harare. Believing that, I consider Banbury to be wrong at 08:02 with his lost 200 tonnes comment.

His 07:12 post is false.

No you're mentioning your potential 7.5k investment because you are playing to the gallery. Not for the first time.

You have dabated assets of RRR before saying such as they were worthless or would not happen and he has countered with examples that did... referring back - originally before my time but it was aspects of that I was remembering in my response to Blueboy'75. And I would say Gold $2800, I think Helpful probably said something like that "incoming" - it or $2700 - one of those amounts - did, so literally Blueboy was wrong at 23:25.

Probably, you are hoping for uncertainty next thursday so you can express your certainty.

Blueboy'75, you ask your own questions then you answer them, inaccurately.

Not like for like... There is more detail supporting objective fact which Bell has alteady discussed re. copper / cobalt interest. Gold has been in demand recently and not the same amount of supply.

Faso, no further updates but the cut off grades for what is commercial at suface and near surface are significantly smaller than for deeper underground, continuity as well as grades important.

Am sure Helfpful, News or several others could have put grade and other considerations much better.

Oh yeah, almost forgot what I was going to say...

Took Helpful's response to Theeeduke as a thought experiment.

When I was mentionioning Britain being barred from joining EEC in 1963 and '67, conversations between Macmillan, and De Gaulle I wasn't generalisimg to other leaders just that those two leaders might be an example of two people not having well understood each other.

Being reliably proficient in French would be useful for speaking to various peole, reading, listening and potentially writing.

Merci...

More than one person speaks French...

More than one peraon speaks French...