Member Info for NikeAir180

17:47 - yes "It doesn't involve... no italics in the RNS".

Italics often apper in company RNS' sometimes as a direct comment to shareholders from the relevant senior person in relevant company so that was an agreeable double negative.

On all sorts of matters - lawyers, beaurocrats move at the speed they deem fit, on the matter many here are intersted in, that pace will not alter for the hope of shareholders and agitation of non-shareholders.

Steadiness does not mean progress is not real.

Third point - 11:41 - a mix up on the photos but not fake, not caught "red handed" as Banbury knows - been debunked several times on here and originally by Bell with support of Winnifrith in replies section to a freelance writer on X.

Correctly... Re. 16:50:

Had thought - past tense re. 12/10/20 RNS... present tense re. 12/10/20 RNS - part of a "powerful tripod of interests... good ground.

Re. 16:50: Had thought - past tense re. 12/20/24... present tense re. 12/20/24 RNS - part of a "powererful tripod of interests"... good ground.

Re. 14:18/19... "has been a good servant to the industry" was how he put it (for years...) from memory or, years of good sevice to the industry - either way, it was a little extra note on one the day's write ups, so would not be able to quickly find it but have mentioned that perspective before.

Well he put it better than that... industry.

Re. 10:36: I read a a well known blogger on the oil and gas industry, who from his generally positive perspective - blogging style, acknowledged years of good service to rhe inddustry (as he put it) when Logfran left NTOG.

Total equity is still a few million more than the estimate of Banbury re. total debt, checked Company Statement of Financial Position as per annual report, 13/12/24, that was referring to: as of 30/06/24.

Total non-current liabilities in that section as per the same day of reference was around 7.6 million with Total Equity aroud 13.7 million (rounding up from from memory).

If total debt and total equity values have changed since 30/06/24 it would still seem to me that total equity would still be greater than Banbury's estimate of total liabilities.

Re. 10:41, Doubt that is a bet that you would make Banbury, given that Helpful has previously informed you that RRR were invrested in Elephant Oil a few years before he was invested in either, think it was before his knowledge of either of those companies.

How much do Soma...

Re. 15:29: Banbury we had pages from the LSE forum yesterday - quite interesting and a good read to be fair - doesn't mean I agreed with all of it, posts considering tin and gold and junior companies with exposure to that stuff from one of the leaders of those companies at or near to the time of posting and / or involved in setting up exposure to the assets - am not re-reading to clarify, anyone can read Zumore's posts yesterday for further detail.

We had Bell on this share chat in december '23, which I missed at the time as a then intermittent reader.

Point with the above, the tin and gold guy seemed like a fairly regular poster, more than Bell - who (correctly) there was no complaint about posting.

Helpful is not employed by RRR, is not a non-executice director of RRR, holds less ten 10% of RRR stock. Exposure to related assets - usually less than ten percent of which RRR might also be invested is perfectly reasonable for people who have the wherewithal to do that.

So company bosses have sometimes visited share chats, as long as they follow the rules when discussing anything including their own companies - no problem.

A very wealthy shareholder with a decent percentage of a comapany could also pop along to the share chat of that company and if also posting - as long as they folliw the rules - no problem.

Helpful knows the rules, it is down to him to follow them. It seems to me your attitide towards Helpful is based on your expressed lersonal sentiment and that you don't like the volume for his posts (from your previous comment) but you often post more than Helpful on this share chat..

You have never expressed a concern with the other examples, Orion was polite to Helpful in an exchange with him from one of the pages posted yesterday (from either Zumore or Panda1) perhaps time to be less discriminatory in your attitude towards Helpful and more polite.

Adverts don't really help with the typos. :')

Blooming numbers... 01:47 was referrimg to 14:38.

Sailors were well known for liking rum, naval officers - gin, it seems general navy crew also had access to a modetate amount of gin.

They were probably all united in understanding the gentle speed to harbour, is a steady way to get there.

Typo by me at 16:38, the RNS I had a question about was actually from 17/04/09.

All general matters around that now adequately answered...

Fair doos...

Thanks H50 and Maidit. : )

Re. 17:10: No he did not tell StockBox that, "If...".

The most recent X videos, will catch up with later, as am in a pub.

Ha.. between, for accuracy.