Member Info for NikeAir180

Re. 19:12: Has it happened before? will it happen again? And are you going to continue reminding me of the other double B in your more compact style...

Also Pumpky, the StockBox interview was on wednesday january 15th so perhaps you are hoping for a StockBox interview, or perhaps an announcement of next interview with RRR, on monday or tuesday, within the next few days - if a chat "next week" is your focus.

Pumpky, StockBox interviewer said they would look foward to chatting again the following week, Bell's response was like a friendly farewell in a similar manner to how people often respond to "see you soon" or "catch up soon".

Re. 17:57: No Banbury, that is not what Helpful was saying or implying at 17:03.

Replying to 10:24 and with regard to 08:21:

Banbury, it is you who has been "clinging to the italics".

No Blueboy1975, not a twist from me nor a false comment such as yourself, repeated with variation at 22:13. I was implying there was an "if" before the quoted words in Pumpky's 09:00 post. There was and close enough to to be a fair recall, even closer was "to the extent..." that was not meningfully different from "if" and was following on from that with consideration of 2:48-3:25 in the relevant interview.

I'm not going to provide an interpretation of the positive aspect of what he said re. anticipation of outcome; regarding the sherpas: he did say "if..." - in no way am I implying a negative in relation to such comment, at this moment - this week or for the future.

Re. 22:13: You are completely wrong Blueboy1975. At no point in last week's StockBox interview was it, as you have put, so absolutely not the case that Bell said he would let us know this wednesday. If a meeting occurred late in the 24 hour day that would never have been feasible, plus it would have had to be worked through with the nomad, if was to be an RNS update - which we have now had.

I don't remember anyone saying the outome of a scheduled meeting was going to be communicated yesterday.

Meetings sometimes occur late / evening...

Rein it in duke, you're not John Wayne.

TD2, the first part of what you considered is probably just sequential coincidence; RRR have some good aspects to their history which you have over-looked, hopefully future history will look better than recent past.

Re. 15:45: Nor did I say or logically imply what Banbury had posted at 15:16.

Re. 15:15: I did not say that Banbury, as you know, just as I know how you twist the use of an emoticom.

At least Helpful's post at 14:27, was closer to the facts of what was spoken in that communication, than Banbury's false nudge regarding what could not possibly have been perceived from the interview referred to, in the other 14:27 post.

Utter nonsense Babnury re. the fouth sentence of your 14:27 post, there was no face to face in that interview - more like listening to tbe radio than watching t.v.

Fib by Banbury at 14:57 - middle sentence, he has been corrected many times on this and sought to mock one of the corrections.

Re. 21:55: that is a basic question on the surface Theeeduke but is with loaded intent. Re. 21:05: Success in not answering does not mean you are correct for option 1 or even the questioned knows the anwswer but if he did, he could not possibly answer and that is why your question had loaded intent.

Option 2 could happen first which might be happy days, if option 1 was to happen first, I have never found such to cause unhappy days and if progress continues there might not be any dilution of happiness.

I am personally satisfied that POW and RRR continue to have a good relationship. That supposition is based on my instinct and previous research.

"White gold" and gold not the same thing, people reassesss whether they want to buy or not, things can change. Gold production is a current priority for RRR as per 13/12/24 annual report - conclusion of Chairman's statememt.

Re. 15:15, Banbury: the litium asset was fully impaired for the current year as per section 13 of the annual report 13/12/24, sales were halted in 2024 as per Other Section of Chairman's statement. Fully impaired for the year ahead following june 2024 is more contextual than just "fully impaired".