Member Info for NikeAir180

Re. 20:15: RRR 100% ownership of RRAL via deal with POW completed as announced by RNS on 19/06/24.

There was an offer received for RRR interest in RRAL as mentioned in the first paragraph of 23/08/24 RNS.

Took a long time to find that as was missing it on the read throughs and had to use the the threads to locate the RNS but there was definitely an offer and the first paragraph of the 23rd August RNS from last year refers to that.

Re. 06:13: Banbury you are assuming a person bought in late january 2023 and just sat on it till now. As a matter of fact someone could have bought in late january 2023 (after the broker report you referred to) and sold in late feburay 2023 at a tangible (around about 20%) profit on the shares bought a month earlier, this was checked from rhe wrapper in which I have always maintained a position in RRR after initial buy.

Someone could have bought in the summer of 2023 - two buys similar number of shares fractional difference in price and sold in the winter of 2023 at a sell price exactly between the two buy prices, pretty much breaking even, and as for me that was not about the lithium, I was exiting the only gold stock in that wrapper for RRR, completely exited RRR in that wrapper in winter of 2023; buying back in, spring of 2024. As for the gold stock I exited - it got bought by a private company last year and would have given me around about a 50% gain, no regrets though, people make their decisions related to their reasoning and circumstances, RRR is a more diverse in its assets than the other one and has some good assets in my opinion, not saying it is better but perhaps the one I exited and this one: both good qualities.

Basically though 2023 for RRR iwouldn't have automatically resulted in massive loss, if someone didn't just buy late january and sat on it. Averaging down in later larger tranches of buys including 2024 - also in that situation not massive loss.

Respect for waiting tactic, referred to yesterday, respect mobile tactics referred to today and people always have to decide with regard to their own circumstances and ultimately their own perspective. Potentially the circumstances of RRR will be updated soon so 2025 and beyond could be different to '23/24.

Some, sometimes and occasionally, also "once in a bue moon"... irrespective of sentiment.

Banbury, in anticipation of the annual report did not call it right at 07:27 on 02/12/24 point 4 - opining delisting, suspension or going private. The annual report of 13/12/24 meant the company continues thus far as a going concern.

He did not call it right ahead of completion with POW for RRR having 100% of RRAL, when he opined that it would not complete.

The annual report suggests gold production is a priotity, that would mean cashflow, any other projects that would also bring cashflow within the next several months would be noted in the next annual report as long as RRR is in a decent enough place, for there to be a report.

Re: 18:45: For another stock I did a sale yesterday to reduce a position in one wrapper and then in another wrapper a larger buy to increase my position and more than balance out my sale and to be positive for overall shares held - portfolio readjustment. Neither the sale or the larger buy were showing up on this website, I have checked the Aquis exchange - which it does not trade on and I have found that it has happened before with that stock and probably one or two others, that the buy and / or sell has simply not shown up. There was also a buy for RRR I did recently - checked it to the second, number of shares and value and it only showed as a sell on this website, most recent RRR buy did show as a buy. Some of the information from the website has been correct, some of it has been incorrect and some of it has been incomplete.

O6/11/24 RNS:

Refers to meeting with government officials to discuss a major and cash generative joint venture - wondering here about the when and if of that is not communicating insider information re. sniffing at 16:19. Red Rock Resources have already referenced on X where the Chairman would be to celebrate the new year. New Year's Eve is not 30/12/24 as I know a couple naysayers are aware of and the day after the day after is New Years Day, technically and by the calendar it coincides with midnight - the new a.m. - first of the year... first foot tradition for a lot of Scottish people.

Some equipment regarding test / production for Faso Minerals paid for.

18/11/24 team and equipment arrived in Ouagadougou. 23/11/24 interview with Stockbox - manager of Faso Minereals project has met with officials - that went well, positive sentiment expressed regarding getting equipment on to site, it baving already arrived in the capital city.

As has been said in a fairly recent RNS not every development will require its own RNS.

Re. 12:02:

One of the highlights of the 11/12/23 RNS specfically states that all costs for the export of 200 tonnes of lithium to to the destinstion port have been been fully paid. That RNS which was explaining a likely related issue of shares will have been checked by tbe nomad. The fact that the annual reoport of 13/12/24 treats the lithium asset as currently impaired does not mean there is a contradiction of the 11/12/23 RNS or 28/03/24.

Ha ha... yes, 2024 and not 2023, was forgetting to subtract back from 2025. Perhaps... when looking back we sometimes loose perspective on this time. It is a fact beyond our different sentiments for this comany... that "this" time is always different and that is what would "make it so". : )

23:37... clarifying. Battery at 2%, shouldn't have rushed it, thought it was at 1%. !

15/08/23 -16/08/23 Theeeduke was was conversing with News - the post that I referred to at 21:27, and myself to which I replied later but also very early on 16/08/23 so I could remember quite a lot and claififying this evening by posting helps my memory of it and should only have been direct if it involved comments of someone else.

Theeeduke, 15/08/23 - 23:34 you said you bought 32 million shares then sold them not long after, with a gain, referring to 29/07/23. 31/07/23 10:05, you said your buys showed up but not your sell (that is possible on this website). Anyway, you focused on the 31 million shares that did show up as a sell on 29/07/24.

Fully appreciate the likeliood that it was someone else today as accepted and for the 31 million back in the summer.

... within an hour on 29th.

Fair doos Theeeduke - that was it, you said you sold 32 million but referred to a 31 million sell on 29th July, last summer and subsequently discussed you own trades up to 31st July in terms of referring to them, sounded like you got a quick gain with an hour on 29th.

Specific examples as with the one you referred to today, do not necessarily reveal a depeer picture.

Well there are other ways I suppose Theeeduke - but it is the same amount of shares give or take a million you were discussing in the spring / summer, overlapping with you own trades according to you as it later turned out in your subsequent comments after drawing attention to what I think was approximately a 32 million sell.

You might know what went on with that one Theeeduke if it was yours but that would be the only proof you would know.

Photos are not necessary to confirm a meeting. Nor would they be necessary to confirm honouring the first foot tradition which from a Scottish perspective would have nothing to do with 30/12/24.

No need to rush...

Possibly that was when he stated it but not when he said it would be received.

Https://www.distance.to/Mbuji-Mayi/Tshikapa

Not much distance... substantial but not too much.

Re.12:55: Someone tweeted RRR the link for an article mentioning El Limon yesterday, RRR retweeted it mentioning their royalty which was fair enough and not pumping anything. RRR sometimes tweet / retweet stuff relevant to them, the commodities or sector they are working with - all fairly normal really.