Member Info for NikeAir180

Ironically betweem Helpful's accuracy and Zumore's accuracy we have....

Was considering in my mind, that some stuff might go back to RRR's origins pre-listing, so thanks Panda1 and Zumore... Watson - co founder and RRR was a subsidiary of Regency Mines.

I think Helpful has givem further clatification at 16:37 and it is also true Bell deserves respect where it is due.

I was reading through Orion's posts - as well as having other stuff to do this afternoon, then looked at Cobra Resources' 5 year performance and regarding time sample re. posts and share price performance - within that sample he definitely got it right, haven't got time or inclination for further research on that company at the moment, respect.... but am literally just sitting on what I have apart from gradually adding to a couple funds.

I will say people who are successful can be very confidant in their opinions - sometimes overlapping with rival perspectives, success doesn't guarantee correct perspective at any one time in the realm of opinions.

On a slight tangent ther two junior oil and gas comoanies that initiated a legal spat - ultimately it was settled amicably and one boss had bought the other boss a coffee around the time of presentation relating to this website.

Earlier this afternoon... Theeeduke and Zumore - noted, cheers.

Re. 14:05: Think there were RNS' in November 2008 concerning RRR exchanging asset ownership, for shares ownnership in Jupiter Mines... that was down to Bell from the RRR side, was aware of Pallinghurst who I had read in a separare RNS, they were acting in concert with.

RRR had RNS' in April 2008, increasing their exposure to Jupiter that was Bell's responsibility as boss of RRR.

Helpful, I spotted an RNS of 17/09/09 mentioning RGL, Regency Mines or something else? and Watson being a director - presumably of RRR? at that time?, not listed on enquiries underneath the RNS', Bell was still boss.

Found various subscriptions of Regency Mines for RRR shares but can't find RRR ever having bought something frpm Regency Mines so either mis read or have so.pmy not re-found the relevant RNS, assumrd from what Dukey said Watson might have been involved in Jupiter from Regency Mines - my interpretation, extrapolation but I could be mistaken on that?

Bell has been boss of RRR all the time it was listed so any investment decisions RRR made during that time are ultimately down to him.

Banbury / Dukey, Regency Mines is the company Watson was managing director of, he was not ever a part of Red rock Resources that I can tell, no connection when I type in his name with RRR, via internet search, though that shows up easily enough with Regency Mines.

As Banbury well knows - he is easy to read, I never said Watson didn't set up an earlier deal, did not have the earlier idea... With regard to RRR as I clearly said, with Bell having been the boss once it first listed, he is responsible as the boss of RRR for the decision of the company to have invested in Jupiter Mines - also I think in one of the early RRR RNS it mention buying a relevant exposure to Jupiter Mines from Regency Mines, however that was set up Bell as boss of RRR would still have been responsible for RRR making that investment, the yea or nay stops with him.

Re. 19:36: Theeeduke you presumably meant that with regard to a Regency Mines perspective many years ago. Bell has always been the boss of RRR so exposure RRR had to Jupiter Mines, any investment made by RRR in Jupiter Mines and any decision to subsequently sell some of that investment is what Bell was responsible for, during the years it brought value to RRR - that is thanks to Bell's decision for RRR to invest in that asset - of which Juno Minerals, is at present, a latent legacy.

Further to 23:35, 00:02: the 20:43 quoted a disgruntled investor from 2017, I recalled that the 2017 annual report detailed an increase in equity, then the 2018 annual report detailed a profitable year.

I will correct 23:35, was on bus - dim lighting and low battery. Elephant Oil quite recently increased its assets... He wasn't entirely corect... The annual report of 2012 detailed some good profits for El Limon, hopefully a royalty for that will activate later in the year - which could bring some cashflow. The year after the one quoted from at 20:43 was quite a strong one for RRR with good recovery in 2018 and overall profit referred to in the annual report of that year.

Re. 20:43 Elephant Oil has got another asst since that time. He wasn't an entirely corect, El Limon had some good prifits as detailed in the 2012 annual report, if a royalty activates on that later this year, that would be futher return.

Re. 16:43: If so... that did not stop RRR having profitable years in 2010 and 2011.

Re. 15:25: More recently... RRR have had profitable years in 2018 and 2020, well done to the management having a profitable year during the first year of the Covid pandemic lockdowns and being able to continue through the years as a going concern.

There is hint of vanity within some few comments... perhaps they will be in vain.

Negative hype assumptions in the final paragraph of 14:23.

Banbury made an apology on a specific matte which he has on more than one occasion referred to on this share chat - that might have been deemed enough, if there was an apology outside of this share chat directly received and / or appropriately received, the "unmasking" would have been satisfied.

He also said we lost a few days (because of events)... relax. That didn't sound petulant, it was assertive and calm. Followed an emphasis of tuesday without a strop.

Re. 19:00: "made to return" - a harshness that is too soon - seems like a twist that ignores individual choice.

Banbury (05:43) that is the thing about you, you have always been a bit of a copier, and manage to top boring; not that it wasn't humour - just your repetition...

Zumore - re. 06:56... it was a rehetorical "if that were so", you distorted the anthropic principle at the end of that post, although reading something that is fictional is perhaps a reason to believe that all of us readers, are not...

The 1987 newspaper article descibed at 22:51 must have jumped out a bit if that were so.

This concluding post is not about "yuppies", a remembered out of the ordinary monday or substantial hurricane.

It is simply that, within 21:27, I had forgotten a boo.

Further to 04:22/50. I will briefly add that News opened two threads as well, on the same day of the original for this one I opened - relevant to the part of 31/01/25 at 22:21, negated.

Technically the relevant part is proved otherwise on one of News' threads on 05/07/24 - relevant to the misattributed coment on 31/01/25; Helpful posted on one of those threads - quoting Boobooboo and then saying underneath, "No idea if it is true or not".

Zumore's correct referral to that post is on the relevant thread I opened on 05/07/24.

Correcting 04:22: the thread was relevant to the post on 31/01/25.

The original thread, "Regency Mines became Corcel" from 05/07/24 disproves the attributed comment by Zumore at 22:21 on friday 31/01/24.

It is incorrect to attribute an aspect of Hamlet Act 3 scene 1 by way of speculative comment to Helpful and no-one attributed it to Zumore, from any of the threads that day or any day as far as I am aware.

On a lighter note: Kemche, nothing required - a fact.

You will likely remenber Lear spending some time ruminating on nothing.