Member Info for NikeAir180

If they were to foreclose and cease the assets, would that be the best way obtain the value from Mussoni?

Hah... add a t , miss a p ! Need to eat... and might be offline if I get dome exercise afterwards. Cheers...

Correcting myself from 12:52, mean to say as reply to Theeeduke.... "And that's it, your last point..." and not "And that's your lastp point..." which if intended would have overly decisive and rude...

A week is a long time in football and so is 48 minutes for an edit...

Either way Helpful, that would still represent a change in circumstances... if the CLN holders were made aware of that, am not going to second guess others but I know if I was in thst position I would consider whatever the current circumstances are and how I think they relate to future prospects.

And that's your last point... "see what happens next week" that's all anyone can do on those questions, acknowledging there is some time, not a lot but some time for good news to emerge.

Remember the saying that "a week is a long time in football"... we have more than a week...

A lot of supposition there Theeeduke, like a novice playing golf on a very windy day. The novice (assuming he has no natural talent and lacks technique) could get lucky and the ball travels within the intende range on a line intended but he might not be proficient enough to make statement of likelihood, the best way to grip bend the legs, transfer body weight through torso and swing.

I'm not a golfer though have played tennis sociably on a very windy day and wouldn't want to even proclaim a guess on the stuff you have just said.

Relevant RNS's for lithium - 20th December 2023 and 28th March 2024, the latter RNS clarifies the current storage strategy.

The writer Banbury refers to is an independent journalist as I understand it, therecwere corrections provided by Bell and another financial writer, emphatically so regarding the telegram group. Had the article appeared in a tabloid or broadsheet newspaper and the corrections provided as official complaint, I think as a minimum there would have been a public acknowledgement if the corrections provided and a clarification that that section of the article challenged was not meant to represent RRR, there might have been an apology. It wasn't worth Bell pursuing any further but at least there was a comments section available to read with the corrections included.

There has been quite a lot of talk today on the "white gold" let's see what happens on the real gold...

I should add immoral posts encountered have been generally rare, though one should be careful in how they describe someone (I am thinking of a different share chat and it seemed to have been dealt with) also, not on this board but I don't think one should be speculating on medication, they might find they've got it wrong specifically and morally.

Your last paragraph Banbury is conflicted. You said if you didn't know better in relation to whether "RRR is in a good place" was a ruse. You do know better then...

There are posters are accross this board and the other one and accross different share chats, who have made immoral posts - there shareholding or non-shareholding position is not the definining factor.

Holding a convertible loan note is not a conflict of interests per se, it helps a company to have cash before cashflow - in one example - and thereby survive and if a holder of the convertible loan note is well intentioned towards the company and the company fulfills it's aim(s) or satisfyingly works towards that company there doesn't have to be any conflict there, also convertible loan notes postpone dilution of existing dhareholders when compared to an up front placing; there has to be some protection for the lender but that is what makes lending a possibly acceptable risk and it is often how some companies such as junior mining ones can stay afloat, pre-cashflow.

The "nearology" was actually right because it is nearby.

Helpful only refers to publicly available information from what I can see, if your objection is that he holds convertible loan notes which aren't automatically public information as to the individual holders

well the same, in my opinion, goes for shareholders who post - that is not automatically public information regarding the individual holders and some will be bigger holders than others. Non-holders obviously can legitimately post, like everyone else it should be according to the site rules.

Correlation - not cause and affect. Zumore was talking about strategy, that's down to management of RRR - something Helpful doesn't seem to part of, therefore he wouldn't be involved in strategy. Other than generalities referred to.- many would assume is part the back and forth within the sector.

There was no wicked witch in Cinderella and while some may think it needs fairy-godmather to make an upside appear, others may say only time and work is required for another possible bull to feature in a nearology story.

The response that is...

And correctly if it was spookology...

If "nearlogy" shows there is good enterprise nearby... that might be of interest and I think a valid specific response to what one(s) may consider to be spookalogy... Reasonably relevant really.

Charlie Munger... (not Mumber which was a mis-type).

Munger and Buffet are examples of value investing but where Buffet liked to focus on mis-priced companies that were good value on that basis, Munger preferred to focus on great companies at fair value, thinking that was better than good companies that were under true value. Buffet described Munger as the architect of Berkshire Hathaway's "modern business philosophy".

Ron Baron is a different type of investor, still very successful.

Rick Rule is a specialist investor, Baron has said he doesn't invest in commodities, Buffet has invested in oil and gas through different types of company and Barrick in receny years but doesn't like holding the hard asset so doesn't bother with gold bars in the home kind of thing... one would assume.

Rick Rule is highy successful as a specialist investor in the junior space regarding mining and oil and gas, he may have some other interests as well but is clear where a lot of his main focus is.

Jim Rickards is a monetarist and both himself and Rick Rule strategically invest in gold. Buffet not that big a fan of gold but still did buy Barrick in recent years.

Different types of great investors can all do well, in my opinion, in different types of market conditions because of their own intrinsic qualities, abiltility to adapt, never to late to learn e.g. Buffet pitching more to Munger's stance (wouldn't surprise me if some of his stance was still retained but that is a guess) and I think high strength in one style is not entirely exclusive of competence in another as market conditions change but it doesn't mean the style that one is expert in would become irrelevant or abandoned, because of current trends at any one time.

I know some of thus at a very basic level from dome general reading, watching YouTub, the occasional read of Motley Fool, memory and there is a little bit of my own opinion includedcwhen making interpretive comments.

News knows a lot more than me regarding general and specific knowledge so if he wants to tidy up anything I have said regarding the greats, no problem.

One more thing I saw an interview on CNBC with John Paulson within the last two years, he made hughe money betting against the sub prime market but did say that the right kind of pre-production gold company could do a lot of multiples and it was a lot... Depends of course on quality of the asset / company and market conditions. It should also be noted: he said "could", anyone with any sense doesn't make emphatic predictions or even definite predictions.

It's raining, now and it will continue to rain, after posting this comment.

Good Afternoon...

Recently there have been a few quips seeming to suggest that if someone is 68, they are somehow not really worth listening to, may is well give up, retire?Hang up the boots...

NONSENSICAL...

WHY?

At 99.... Charlie Mumger was still one of the two main guys running Berkshire Hathaway with epic competence, he has quite recently passed away. Warren Buffet, the boss of Berkshire Hathaway is 93 and epically competent. Ron Baron who has his own growth fund (a different type of investor to the other two) is 80 and epically competent, his biggest publicly listed holding was bough very early... and he is also highly competent.

The age quip won't work for anyone fair minded or anyone who has some basic relevant knowledge of the topics discussed. it just weakens the naysayer's criticisms, even if it was somehow meant to bring one or two or more naysayers in to a personal type of criticism, the echoes and that type of multiple is undoubtedly a diminishing return on what might earlier have been interesting criticism - whether one agrees with the overall perspective or not. Replies and further comments don't automatically add to the quality of the post as that would be intrinsic.

Interesting.... not interning, am a little weary but think that was the predictive text again. On the t.v. there is a joke about a cup of tea, but the kettle will go on a topic or two later...

News your research is often interning... I have no idea regarding your topic this evening. I have been out for a bit and my previous comment was typed before reading the points you've discussed this evening.

Am about to have a chilling take away, watch t.v. maybe a film or sport.

Have a good evening / weekend...

Blueboy1975, anything typed on here is a selective process like the effort of writing, sometimes multiply selective because of the site specific predictive text and sometimes human error as well which might seem to require a re-vesit on occasion. You were being selective... I have never told anyone.... to give it a rest, I stated facts following one man who put up a link and another who put up a diatribe.

Happily England won, so goodwill to them, can unite some of our sentiment for the near future.

Have a good weekend...

Banbury you are the one not giving it a rest...

Something to think about: Helpful will read this at some point and I believe News will understand...

Helpful is not employed by RRR from what I can tell and including everything that has been said on this forum by himself and others, even when there has been misinterpretation and reasons for explaining "disgruntled" - I am not just attributing criticisms to you. Major shareholders and / or directors of RRR have no power over Helpful. There won't be any restriction of posting as long as he follows the rules including the rules of this forum - which are a good guide for everyone.

Someone will win this football match eventually...

It seems the red team are now one up... I hope RRR will one day prove they have got good asset(s) and that will prove which meataphorical football team has the current quality, the balance of the debate.

1-1... in the sport...