Member Info for NikeAir180

Following that thought experiment through News... perhaps a "qualified shrink" would reply with a "single referral" but it would be a (non-medical) referral back to the site for someone wasting their time...

Blueboy1975, answering your question fom 20:27 a few hours ago, answer is NO. I don't know anyone who posts on this share chat, nor anyone to do with the company we are supposed to be chatting about.

I might have other things on the next couple of days than spending too much time following the comments but will catch up when I can.

Cheers...

Well that is a bit more specific to RRR matters Banbury. Will there be any gold production within those several months, will there be any revenue? any other value increasing events? Not impossible... so the projected path you have laid out might unfold but it might not.

Anyway, I am about to have some food and have got other things to get on with.

The 17:59 post over there was not sufficiently valid...

Refute is to prove or disprove.... as response... it is also to deny or contradict.... This outline is consistent with the 3 categorisation from the Oxford English dictionary as consulted via Internet search.

Now going forward it is probably best to focus on what is relevant to this share chat, and News perhaps one or two across the forums are wanting to occasionally to digress beyond company relevant points on this forum.

No poster on here is perfect but the diversionary invite of one and invalid critique of another does not undermine the main positive poster of today.

Cheers...

The specific "umbrella term" for more clarity... was dyspraxia... the NHS definition suggests a different categorisation and so the sub-grouping was wrong. A difference between the social and the motor... a bit of a stretch to try and suggest a style of posting with its' own emphasis is relevant to dyspraxia. Other points that have since been made are also valid...

.... misinterpretation (correction of spelling).

I should confirm so there is not room for misinteretation, closing sentence of my 17:06 contains a typo and it was missing a word, I.e. in the instance speed of typing was not keeping up with my thinking: not "up you" but: up to you...

Most people would realise it was just a typo... cheers.

The "check" of course would be outside of either site... hence I alluded to the NHS definition.

... on the other site.

Banbury you are not right about a "great" post from 14:00 over on the site - it includes an umbrella term to refer to a plural... The NHS definition of the same umbrella term categorises differently so the grouping is inappropriate. To stretch it to a poster's language and style is a reach to far... if the incorrect is meant to be funny, it is not and if just a mistake, the attempt at humour is lacking in general... respect. If you want to support that, it is up you but perhaps you should check first...

Too much Theeeduke....

Anyway, I think given bleak humour from yesterday and acknowledgement of the mortal fate we all share from Confounded, that might have influenced an unwise joke which I don't think you mean even as you expressed it. The perceived funny aspect can sometimes overrule the respect aspect, regardless of other persons, we have to respect humans.

Acknowledging it is actually Confounded... which his is what I had started by typing but once before had got the nickname wrong and couldn't remember which way round it was, plus wanted to get the below reply out in the same day. And no, I do not believe there is any confunding that has been going on, so not a freudian slip just a typo, Aim stocks can be frustrating but once something is realiably capitalised with a means to market or crystallisation of value, the sentiment of people might be significantly more positive.

A bit of humour at the end of your comment Theeeduke... He wasn't speaking about RRR boss in a bad way, he chucked a bleak joke but it was part of a sardonic wit. Two things to remember: Helpful has previously assured those that over-interpret, he is not a friend - actually meets the guy you don't seem to like less than once a year. Seems like he wouldn't want to holiday with him in a tent or chat meaningfully with him in another continent, presumably phones and emails are useful. The other thing is that Confunding sometimes meaningfully jokes about people spending a lot of their mortal time criticising this small cap stock and he has seen similar elsewhere. I'm pretty sure Helpful will have read Confounding today and wit sometimes responds to wit with, wit.

I read the interesting RNS from PPP and also Earl's comments, Banbury. It looks he has expressed optimism and scepticism within the same day but couldn't find any reference to "ponzi" so you might be over inerpreting on that. It was probably optimism, nearer the time News was posting on this and scepticism nearer to your post.

Well you don't really know Theeeduke... At least a couple of convertible loan note holders would seem to also, already hold shares in RRR so I think they would think of more than one aspect. Trying to work these things out with a feeling of certainty before RNS seems to be a little bit like looking at a rainbow, we can see a few of the colours but not all of them even though we know there are more.

Now, I don't think you have mentioned and certainly not originated, the mention of "spectrum" on either of the RRR share chats so good for you but I thought rainbow was quite appropriate because as well as been a spectrum that can be explained by physics, it is also a believed by some to be a type of promise, perhaps more long lasting than the type of promise that a few questioners have discussed. With a slightly different aspect there will always be rain, even if there might be some sunny days ahead but I think that is still part of a healthy atmosphere.

It was a high of 30 degrees celsius in Burkina Faso yesterday and it would have been slightly under 30 when Helpful was having a cold beer yesterday on a day of 34 degrees heat, sounds like a holiday but some people still want a chat?

If some repeat critics wanted to share a 6 metre Bell Tent, they might find enough room for the main naysayers of the last two days and possibly the naysayers from the ADVFN RRR share chat. If there is any overlap of naysaying, they might find as of today, they are in a comfortable space.

Spacing in my below post is not for emphasis, it's an editing scroll up thing, delete space thing that sometimes skewes the layout without being able to see how the post will fully appear in its text format.

The high in Burkina Faso yesterday was 30 degrees Celsius.

In any case he has Banbury on filter most of the time

as he has said - so doesn't read his posts till later -presuming he might catch up or skim through at some point but probably a busy man or maybe he likes to enjoy a holiday, few days away (am guessing) so might not fit that in very much.

I don't know AimDogs but apparently it's 24 degees Celsius in Burkina Faso which is ten degrees less than wherever Helpful was having a beer yesterday.

What "continual spouting" are you referring to Banbury? Most continuation today has been from you.

... not to be seen again (since 13:04, so far) might have been more reasonable than "never to be seen again".