Member Info for NikeAir180

Re. 28th July 2024... being on the same thread...

News, your 28th July link is on the same thread as Bell'answer from 2023, so ultimately (with Z's later clarificafion) you and Zumore are not in contradiction contradiction over the links.

Notably the question or comment that Bell was replying to on July 6th 2023 is not visible and when someone says "Apparently" that could be taken as putting doubt on an assumption or it could be a bit of banter about an assumption, there is no evidence to support Zumore's stated opinion that Bell was trying to "manipulate investors" into believing he was in the DRC at that time.

This time... I don't know specific to the country but he seems to be spending some time in Africa...

I'm more in agreement with you on this spec' but at least it's a multiple (of visits) perhaps news was teasing? on the other had it is sometimes how someone reads it...

I think we are somewhere between (and inclusive of) day(s) and a week or two before we hear rrr news and I would be very surprised if there is not at least... a status update within that time.

Cheers for now...

The deferred shares that were discussed a while ago are not "dead" but latent - the same with assets of RRR which will hopefully activate before deferred shares.

Clarifying: about three week after interview, about two weeks on from 16th - give or take a day... clearing up tired maths.

... two weeks... not "to" minus any promises...

The most recent RRR interview is the most recent relevant public comment, no reason to assume it is other than stated, no futher minus marks so far.

Wednesday last week of July is to weeks later, that would be a reasonable amount of set up time if equipment had arrived by 15th/16th July, no one really knows until there is a relevant RNS.

Hearsay from a poster last thursday is no promise at all.

"The Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend".

... but - not "buy" which was a mistype.

Not a ridiculous twist, you were speaking for others in how to interpret a "random poster". I am one of the others and as one, I have explained why private communications shouldn't be regarded as a guideline for others such comments cannot be verified- Chat rules 5d explain that and it us not a twist. I have never assumed what that postervsaid is going to happen buy I am not saying it is impossible, I am giving more weight to the latest RRR stocbox interview until informed otherwise or inclusive of the near future - if not.

No blueboy1975, you and others are not supposed to believe what a random poster said yesterday about when someone "rocks up" to relevant country and (maybe finds some gold or) communicates about equipment on sight because that is a private communication which cannot make this verified - rule 5d of the chat rules for this site - make that clear and Helpful has not said anything to support that poster's comments nor has he directly contradicted them, he has taken Bell at his word re. Stockbox interview re. flying out on the 16th, other stuff was possibly a guessed itinerary, although not to the full detail of such, either way relevant people to RRR would be out there - if out there, to enable potential gold production which may require the relevant set up first - as far as that goes towards itinerary, I am am guessing.

Helpful you may wish to read at some point 20:54 comment today...

Am off line in a minute...

Perhaps Helpful had assumed RRR had updated on percentage of ownership if ALR if timing of communication was as you said. It was not imminenent to lithium being sold and in fact a long time has gone by since so was not price sensitive and if a slight mistake (big if) it was a very minor one in my opinion but I agree it is worth thinking before typing.

That said... perception is not reality. In a court of law or even some academic pursuits the facts are searched with the latter, established by weight of evidence in the former (potentially appealed later) on the weight of evidence it seems to me Helpful is pretty careful to me, we are talking about RRR and assets as they are now. It is not just as public sector or your interpretation of what public sector says because ultimately the ultimate establishement of what perception should be might be something like a tribunal or a court of law, by logical extension - I don't mean towards any specific person.

I don't think you take the aspersions as seriously as you say, you have recently - correctly acknowledged that he might not be.

You could have brought the specific post, if you were very sure of your accuracy to the site's attention by report post option, instead you like to repeat variation of the aspersion and it is sometimes a conflated criticism of both RRR and Helpful.

There have been many times you have been wrong with what you have said, several occasions I have corrected you e.g. Helpful is not employed by RRR so no point waiting to directors of the company about someone who doesn't answer to them but you could have communicated with this site's admin if you had genuinely believed it a problem. It seems to me that you never did... and if you did they didn't think so.

I'm pleased to see he's till here.

Cheers...

Your perception Banbury and "the reader" are not synonymous. P

If we were to walk this through... at 15:38 Banbury went on a bit of a hike, at 17:04 Helpful just went into the back garden. AimDogs of 18:40 added to the humour but that... was months ago, even though not then... and not yet... then.

Ditto for a 28% reduction....

A 27% reduction in ownership of Faso Greenstone, compared to the most recent relevant RNS, would still mean RRR would comfortably own more than 50% so that comparison is not damning...

It's not a surprise that there is no RNS because it is only a week and a half since the presumed fly out to Burkina Faso, it was stated on the most recent interview with Stockbox that that was going to be on Tuesday (16th) then I wouldn't exlect to hear until next week at the earliest perhaps mid-week which is the end of the month or Friday - Monday / Tuesday following week - so basically up to another week and a half and I don't think it can be much later than that before they can give an update- whatever the statuss may be.

This site (seen and corrected) just replaced status with stuff - well I hope the next RNS does contain: good stuff...

Thank you Helpful, I'm not going damn, the site won't let me : ) but I agree with with your clarification...