Member Info for NikeAir180

Regarding 11:22, about 90... minutes later. There is only an hour of time difference between BF and UK, so not sure how an occasional tweet would suggest someone was not where they said they were going to be.

A cited statement of fact does not prove an ascribed feeling of pride.

Maybe, it's an also can... ?

Acknowledging my slightly wonky edit... thanks.

News, I'm not going any further on that at the moment. I did email an all-round, considerate summary of your concerns and my own reading, of what I had read... I did acknowledge in a fairly relaxed way: any response or non-response was up to RRR. Immediately after sending the email I realised the most appropriate option, if nothing had changed would be, not to respond, just... to the summarised, share chat link / speculation.

Cheers...

Well there has been no RNS on the mining licence question and I won't refer to the content of the reply I got today. Thing is News, before yesterday's speculation, it was the case that positive positives were wanting an RNS and some naysayers were wanting a Reach or less... Today some naysayers might have liked an RNS and some positive posters liked that there wasn't any public comments.

The main thing Helpful is, we are still where are... I thought I would let you know News at 18:56 was responding to the 18:01 post from the other forum as well as the 18:30 one here, so to save time for Banbury the correction has already been provided, am not endorsing his comments though.

Hope you are still enjoying some of your holiday...

Blueboy1975, re. 14:31, both your sentences are wrong, no pats on backs.

Banbury, you admonished News for saying we await for an RNS, this is to speculation from twitter links and a video or two, the speculation is the interpretation and potential over-interpretation of what this applies to.

News asked for people to raise the concern with the company yesterday, I said we would need an RNS to know if anything had suddenly changed regarding RRR mining licence and also, rather crucially, if there was no RNS relating to mining license speculation, that would be also interesting.

It would seem, as of today that my instinct that there might be over-inerppretation (I believed and believe... it was over-interpretation) and News' instinct that it wasn't relevant to RRR has been correct.

I am confidant... there will be no such RNS today because nothing has negatively changed for RRR regarding current situation of mining licences to relevant country re. yesterday's link(s) and related links put up today.

People can choose who they want to filter, whether to retain some courtesy or the opposite but as of today it is News and I who are correct, not those you say who are "spot on". It would seem a mistake to have admonished News as you did.

I am happy to confirm part of what Zumore has said - 07:43, 22/07/24 and correct my second paragraph from 00:57 on 21/07/24.

When I clicked on the link there was also an episode from the relevant series that appeared just above it, these episodes rotate, not the same each time when the link is pressed. I made the mistake of assuming it was the start of the episode, I cited, as said elsewhere I am a luddite and I had some foods and beer, so the concentration might have been slightly off.

It is a three second video which Zumore posted as he has stated, the character demonstrated a tendency towards the miserable and one can choose how they react other people's posts, the other points in the 00:57 post still stand.

Zumore, I have watched some episodes of that series years... ago but I haven't been watching youtube episodes... in whole or plural .

News, the approximately one minute video put up on the twitter post - link which requires translation, I missed until today. There is no evidence, from the video, that it is specifically relevant, it may be generally interesting.

The link from AimDogs was to a valid subsidiary but was it a round up of recent news and was terefor over-interpreatation or was ther new information from the last 48 hours or so and the brief points wholly representative, those are my questions that I am considering and I've done my own research, agree let's see what RRR says and if they say nothing, that is also interesting.

Will be offline now for hours or till tomorrow.

Cheers...

Replying under heading of the post is not a support or negation of the thread-heading.

I have looked up the link provided by AimDogs, I can't access the link Kemche provided on the other forum, I have read the translation of Zumore's twitter link and watched the start of the YouTube video.

The link AimDogs provided to subsidiary of a mainstram news/business media outlet. I agree with some of News' specific points acrross both forums e.g. verbatim...

I am going to add that the headlines of a couple of sources from Zumore this evening, or the introductory expression from those sources to introduce the topics may not fully represent the the current situation.

I have read other sources over the last week and recent times but I am not going to get into foreign policy of nations and recent geopolitics on this forum.

It could be as some have interpreted but I would be expecting the company to be keeping up with the latest developments and I don't see the next RNS writes itself from what I have seen today.

I will look to RRR for further specific perspective.

... break time not tome...

Another advantage of a three dimensional keypad and monitor, I presume, would be to scroll up more easily on substantial text, if willing to take the time to edit.

Cheers...

Looking to main positive posts from yesterday, the gap between 18:10 and 18:24 is impressive in that both posts are quite long enoug, given the time gap am guessing that humans could type that quickly on a mobile device even if impressive.

If someone was using a three dimensional keyboard it would intuitively seem to me that it would be possible to type much more quickly than on smart style keypad such as on a mobile phone or ipad.

Anyone who is seriously suggesting "Internet bot" has possibly forgotten or not considered how much faster and easier it is to see what one is typing with a three dimensional keyboard and monitor.

My guess is physical keyboard was used but still possible for a hunan type quickly on smart devices plenty of break tome was obvious later in the evening.

I would regard any pile on of the "bot idea" or unreasonable repetition of that idea as another type of personal attack, previous citation on this forum pointing to the other one, where the humour had gone too far, hence I referred to NHS definition would also fall under the personal attack category and consider the examples referred to as abusive if repeated and in the citation example abusive across both forums.

Acknowledging... that my post heading is adaptation from comedy sketches approxomately fifteen years ago.

Obviously I was meaning the 2013 annual report throughout the 02:22 post.

Cheers at 03:03.

Just clarifying with regard to the link News put out for the 2023 annual report, I got a 404 page not found on pressing the link. Even so the 2013 annual report for RRR can be found on the company website, it can aso be found by typing London Stock Exchange, Red Rock Resources 2013 annual report - or some sort of appropriate sequence of that specific.

The big details are on page 3 of 76 as News said...

News, just adding a quick correction: the correct spelling of the person Banbury cited is Noirua.

I skimmed through bits of the video Zumore put up, I'm guessing there will be some happy progression in the episode or more comedy that makes people happy but by contrast from "Lurch learns to dance" from The Adams family... around about 11:40 in the video Lurch says he likes to be miserable...

Perhaps someone can like reacting to your posts in a miserable way, or a sardonic way, with or without parody. People can like reading them. It is also possible that someone could appreciate some of the humour in the parody but still choose the original source... That confirms to me the strength and validity of the original source.

If someone thinks 20 years of tales on RRR is worth turning up for beer, it presupposes, I think the misery aspects win out which might make some happy or perhaps even a recovery occurs but on pint drinkers terms? I am a pint drinker though, and I would like a recovery to build from the current efforts.

Post at 5:05am refers to interviewer laughing slightly as he asks the question and the straight laced reply from the interviewee.... I am also using my own words to describe, having also seen the interview.

Perhaps the interviewer was slightly relaxed at that moment and is well a aware it is a long running question but these things do take time even in the positive outcome. There is also a slightly sociable and conversational element to interviews so there will be moments of subtle banter and humour from time to time.

I saw an interview between mainstream interviewer and significant politician, interviewer hed briefly laughed at the answer then repeated the answer as question. Knowing the political instincts of both involved - it does not mean interviewer was laughing at the topic but rather the decisiveness of how the answer was expressed.

A little bit of humour or relaxation during an interview does not mean the potential is over, non-relaxation does not logically mean it is more likely to be satisfied.

Specinvestor99 and anyone else, the surfers advert of 98 for said stout was also my reply to the zebras... I really like the rhythm of it but that is not a suggestion of any type of ailment...

Time, endeavour, patience from two different millenia...

He didn't literally state "education by watching TV" and although I wasn't thinking of your criticism specinvestor99, I'm going to reply to the hoofbeats... by invoking the Guinness Surfers' advert of 1998, if you.watch it you will know what I mean.... The fairly old swimmer, advert for the same stout, from 2001 is also cool. My enthusiasm for those adverts is nothing like some kind of promise other than after "119 seconds" it might be a pretty good pint...

As of now I'm going to have water and tea, people should always have what is right for them, and rightfully avoid sometimes, the zeroes in some industry are of a very good reputation.

Cheers and have a good weekend...

Just read back to News' Perry Mason, development points... When saying "nuanced in interrogation" from watching t.v. shows it could be he is meaningfully joking, some people might react or it could be there isn't any irony and he means it. An intelligent and perceptive person could pick up nuance from watching legal dramas and real life courtroom shows, they could also meaningfully joke.

Just typing more even it is more, "again" does not mean someone has gone over the rainbow, there always seems to be a discernible point, some logic. It was a quiet day on here earlier and this stock has been attacked a lot by some posters so maybe he is doing different types of defence plus from the few times I have read him on other share chats - he is considerably more brief it seems, again and again.

Nice of Banbury to say "off the spectrum" an old slang phrase which could just as easily be slighty wild, eccentric or maybe idiosyncratic in writing syle or potentially for a potential subject of that remark: off the spectrum in terms of intelligence? Am meaning outside of here with all due respect - but not exclusory.

Almost forgot... many areas of enterprise whether the legal profession, the business world, the building sites there could be any number of people who are not mentally average but are just as capable of doing an above average job as the mentally average, whatever mentally average could be.

It doesn't really mater if someone has gone over a rainbow or not but if someone in another place has someone on this forum on their mind, well it comes back to validity or non-validity of points made and ultimately, the same for points of progress for RRR.

Just as a scenario... it would have been possible to buy some RRR stock approximately in the middle of March 2024 and a low price perhaps using ISA capacity and then some perhaps in April 2024 or perhaps more recently buy more RRR stock at a lower price than in March, using new ISA capacity. That might be a matter of choice of allocation rather than tactically averaging down, even if it had a similar effect. If the amount brought in the new tax year at a lower price was of a larger proportion than in March, then with share price fluctuations it would have been possible to have been in profit on RRR during the last few months.

It is not my concern what anyone may or may not have done in terms of investment strategy and tactics, I am just showing one way where replies to the recent questioner could be entirely valid both then and now.

I also note at 23:17 there was a general mention of adaptation, perhaps even considering whether to adapt or not is an adaptation in the mental consideration before action or inaction. Any person's adaptation or consistency is their own private concern and if they do not want to share further that should be respected.