Member Info for NikeAir180

You've done this one before Banbury in terms of the publication and I think... date of the article. Doesn't alter that things, so far, look goldie...

He wasn't just talking about RRR... How would you know which basket had eggs with good yolk and which had eggs that broke?

One man's tactics might suit one football team and another man"s different tactics might suit a different team depending on abilities of the players and strength of the opposition. Water bottles should not be thrown on the pitch etc, balls can be thrown on to the field sometimes.

Good weekend...

Those.... ! : )

Correction of spelling... Simone de Beauvoir. All three of this thinkers were interesting but I also like that Albert Camus: a famous existentialist was also a goalkeeper...

I didn't realise there were three Bill and Ted films... It was from the first one (sticking my neck out based on memory...) that Keanu's character said "to label, is to negate..." Only a few years later after seeing that film I would read a little bit of Soren Kierkegaard (surname may not be spelt correctly - Danish theologian, first official existentialist...) Keanu's character was neatly adapting from Soren (only aware of the original quote more recently) I think with the comic timing and serious expression it was beautifully put in the film.

I have very few absolutes that I go by but perhaps an expression is meant as an overall, in context - a way of thinking, almost a guideline, not an absolute.

A lot of stuff comes back to context and intention, I am in a cafe at the moment. Wiser heads than thee and me will probably read this forum and know that a non-expert including a video does not negate anyone on here. If I was tea-total, or on a spectrum or had a Msrtin Luther or Charles Dickens undiagnosed OCD or just an aspect and neither or less than three had or none... (am not stepping myself up but might know more about Sunday Kreek and Kilmore and Kilmore West from an ore perspective than at least Luther...) the wise reader would quite possibly be able to discern which comments of all of us are decent, which are good to high quality. Like the theologian and existentialist they will intuitively or actually realise most stuff can only be truly known or positively assumed, mentally weighed up on balance through one's own thinking and research.

There were also atheist existentialists and why not more religious than just one and why not agnostic one's as well, I would assume... (plural).

Existentialism inspired "Theatre of the Absurd" which was profoundly philosophical with aspects of comedy and strangeness.

I think both Albert Camus and Jean Paul Sartre and probably Simone de Beviour (hopefully I am remembering her name correctly possibly other French thinkers of that type of philosophy (and others...) were well known for spending time in cafes.

I sometimes just like a coincidence, might get a third mug of tea...

Predictive text or predictive software uniwue to this site, I tend to call it text and am a complete luddite, News usually rers to it as software which is probably more correct. Luddite with a non-capital l is a good example... I tried to type it with a correct spelling and an adjacent comma - as I was getting to the comma - it kept re-writing the word, eventually it worked possibly as I slowed down went back a space and put the comma or whatever but just confirming News is correct on this matter... the problem will not be found if you type in another platform which has nothing to do with LSE, e.g. a an email perhaps not on this platform... which remains a good site overall. I have never got predictive text set up...

Have a good day everyone, be nice...

.... sold not solved, predictive text... even if I might almost have solved? (joke).

Am revisiting that convertible bond idea. At 03:40 yesterday, I was responding to News 19:50 post of the day before, I was trying to develop my understanding from that post and different concepts from other posters. I have since read the other site and developed my potential understanding further.

I was referring to a 200k sterling convertible bond but it is better to think of it is a much higher value convertible bond for which an interest rate payment to the bondholder might have been £200,000 pounds. The bond holder decides he wants this payment in shares and the company that is paying the interest on the convertible bond agrees. Previously any intrrst rate payments above annual ISA limit would not have gone in to an ISA. So now there are high value total shares being issued but they can't be received into am ISA because the value exceeds the annual ISA limit. However, the bindholder would prefer to have his share in an ISA and fortunately also has cash available in his ISA to buy the equivalent number of shares. Because every buy of x number of shares requires x number of shares to be solved the HNW knows he can buy the equivalent amount in his ISA because he can simply sell the shares issued, that were being held in his fund and share account to make sure therecwere enough to buy in his ISA but thus is not the same as a "bed and sit" because the value is 10 x the annual ISA limit. It is a choice on the portfolio in which to hold the shares and could in theory be done in one or two hits or more staggered but the shares could be sold in the fund and share account and bough in the ISA but bought from capital in the ISA platform.

I have preferred to use the £200,000 amount as a way of thinking about the RRR rns of 04/07/24. My expression of this idea may not be perfect and if stuck on scroll up I may not be able to edit well. I think I have shown and I am just thinking as a layman, how RRR's rns could be entirely correct and I acknowledge there may be other slightly different mechanics by which it could also be entirely correct.

For the record it is very possible to have moved on from that time with good recovery, and that should be remembered as possible, with general will to the good...

Zumore there is a difference between mistaken and lying, The second paragraph of your post from 20th July 2018 on RGM.L is a little ambiguous, possibly involving ambiguity and / or a little bit of accuaccuracy but not certainty.

It is true that it was somebody else who said the comments that were quoted but the second paragraph may have been what someone could think of in terms of chumminess even if it might have been an over interpretation and yes after the time in question...

... there was one from Zumore on the RGM.L share chat for this site from July 20th 2018 16:00.

Looks like he is replying to the poster that was cited by both Helful and himself but he was not that poster, refers to "the Gary situation" as being before his time (am paraphrasing slightly) that seems likely from what limited stuff I've read. Reading that whole post people could interpret different aspects in a non-unananiomous way and there is a difference between genuine conjecture and lying.

Perhaps best to focus on matters from this era but with all things in life I don't think one should loose sight of the past which doesn't mean it should necessarily be referred to which is not a complete negation of referring back.

I appreciate News referencing what I consider to be kindness from the Chairman, which does not contradict a firm but fair resolution.

There are still posts on the old Regency Mines share chat from this forum and there was one from Zunore f

Okay, Helpful thanks for clarifying that...

Noting also UK tax residency is actually the pre-requisite to be able to have an ISA, not British citizenry...

No worries Helpful, I have just read you 14:41 post and that is what I am replying to at 14:54.

Have a good weekend...

I note Helpful, you said yesterday at 19:01, "He is a British citizen" which would be necessary for any transaction to done with an ISA and yeterdays RRR rns referred to the converted shares, intended to held in an ISA. That is not the same as saying that you know who it is.

Given it is a large value, my guess is that a high value convertible bond may have been held in an ISA and appreciate I may have to do some research as to whether that is possible, if I wish to know that for certain, doesn't change that RRR is an interesting phase.

Cheers...

At 03:40 I was responding to News' 7:50pm post from yesterday, initially I understood thet gist of that post by instinct but then I read a differing comment and I was struggling on how to understand it, I then did some research.

Suppose someone had accrued enough money to spare £200,000 from there ISA, they could of zo inclined have a convertible bond set up with a company. At a later time , the convertible bond could be converted into equity and so the previous bondholder would now have shares in the company, they previously had a convertible bond set up with.

If ISA rules allow, a high net worth person might be able to have held a high value convertible bond which is later converted to equity.

I think the RRR rns yesterday was possibly entirely correct.

I did ask News and Helpful, if they wished to correct, clarify or agree with my 03:40 post, I may do further research to seek more clarication in the absence of that but I think he RRR rns from yesterday would have contained understanding to what was being referred.

I was actually responding to News post of 7:50pm from 04/07/24.

Might just do a bit of a read through later as will probably be a bit tired.

Have a good day / weekend...

Late after having to make a second attempt to charge, phone, forgot to switch on, also half-watching election at moment.

Have caught up with the comments and done some research in response to News' comment at 07:50 04/07/24.

I think a a high net worth person could theoretically hold a bond in a company at let's say 200k sterling, assuming the ISA had built up significant value over some years and / or investments having done well - allowing such capacity following development of wealth from initial conditions, a high net worth individual could hold a convertible bond with a company from their ISA and this could later be converted in to shares from within the ISA, following HNW person making such request to the relevant company.

Helpful / News, feel free to correct me or clarify or confirm if this is broadly correct - seems to me that there may be no contradictions within RRR rns from 04/07/24.

Think this is what I was thinking of, thanks to News for his post, slightly after 8pm pm 30th June 2024, think was the day..

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/investing/article-1705197/Midas-strike-gold-on-the-trail-of-explorers.html

Am not going back over it now Banbury but someone recently posted a professional article or note, from several years ago referring to that interest, they were more positive than your emphatic negation.

Sorry I can't remember for certain who it was but I reckon someone knows and would appreciate if yhey could re-post it.

In junior mining, it can take a long time to bring a project in to production or find the right partner to do do so, that is normal, sometimes there can be faster progress as well, that is also normal.