Member Info for NikeAir180

Am not going back over it now Banbury but someone recently posted a professional article or note, from several years ago referring to that interest, they were more positive than your emphatic negation.

Sorry I can't remember for certain who it was but I reckon someone knows and would appreciate if yhey could re-post it.

In junior mining, it can take a long time to bring a project in to production or find the right partner to do do so, that is normal, sometimes there can be faster progress as well, that is also normal.

Just to be clearer: I was agreeing with Helpful's logic... this does not mean News' logic is not worth considering, kind of like logic being part of logic... I liked the little bit of flexibility as News clarified...

I agree Helpful, just thought News may want to clarify what he meant and he did that well... acknowledging a little space for flexibility. People just have to make their own decisions and slightly different strategies, perhaps from a couple of positive posters could both be logical, allowing space for tactical adaptation or how personal circumstances at the time may influence decisions.

Cheers...

News, I always like seeing your posts, on this one, I think you are missing what would have been a penultimate word on the final line on the fifth paragraph - you may want to add a quick correction or copy with the word included. I have read a similar aspect from you before, so know what you mean, others might as well but I think you may want to clarify?

Cheers and have a good day....

The fact that person(s) were happy to accept shares yesterday suggests to me, they thought they were having.

Thanks News, I completely agree...

There are also different types of fitness, a portly bodyweight for one person might be optimal for another, was W.G. Grace fit?... and while it is good to invest in one's health - sensibly, bit of exercise, adequate water, balanced diet, there is also luck involved. Better, I think, to wish one well and not to have too much pride comparatively, a bit of self esteem is fair enough and of course doing stuff that one finds interesting balanced with some other relaxation, seems a nice way to go about things.

Am probably going to break off now for a bit, have a good evening...

Ah, okay - I didn't scroll down on the link. There is no justification for that post. As for the "10 million and I will leave you to it", doesn't mean someone is going to leave supporting the company but might feel on a genuine upside case there is less remotely credible stuff for naysayers to say all is doom and gloom. I looked on that as a figure of speech rather than a concrete prediction, with some range. If someone does well, good luck to them.

It was unclear from two of the negative posters who Banbury ended up ascribing 68 years to. I had also read poorly as opposed to portly, I would probably have let portly go. A bit ironic, considering the lady who lived to 122 enjoyed a moderate, fairly regular intake of port wine.

You are correct to criticise publishing of personal details, still not sure if the "68" is part of that.

On the light hearted side I sometimes associate oil with Guinness, don't know if stout could ever work as a biofuel? : )

Who is 68? If Banbury, you are referring to DL, it seems he is 63. I have checked Wikipedia - before it fully opens up, it states 63 years old. I have also consulted an Evening Standard interview from May 2015 when he stated he was 53, allowing for month of the year he could be 63 as Wikipedia states in 9 years and 2 months later.

Winston Churchill was a bit rotund and was known to drink more than the recommended amount of alcohol, obviously he was under pressures at times which were incomparable to most and he may have gone for walks in the countryside, near his estate? What I do know is what I was told when I was very young; "sometimes people have a strong heart...".

The oldest person to ever live, according to records gave up smoking at 117, it had only ever been moderate and after meals to help guard against migraines, I think it was also speculated in another source to what I am consulting right now that moderate red wine throughout her life might have helped her heart (that might even be my own speculation!) Think I got tge impression with her that it was a moderation of the comforts in life. Wikipedia have also confirmed moderate port wine consumption.

It should also be remembered that wealthy people can afford good diets and possibly live in good local environments, all of that can help.

Health wise what works for one person may not be entirely the same for another.

I find it rather novel to speculate on one's health as an attempt to deauthenticate one's support for RRR and you exaggerated someone's age, following exaggeration of the number of years you have been posting and calling it correctly.

Plenty of young glass collectors these days...

And I also like that the young generation have a health attitude to such stuff, it's perhaps motivated Guinness O.0 which some pubs serve and I supposed to taste good.

That is correct specinvestor99, I realised about half an hour ago - with food in my belly but before clarifying I was reading through the posts and endorse your one.

The delay was 24 hours to allow for a bank holiday but still went smoothly. I think the 3rd of June remark was a bit more negative in the sentiment of - apart from a bank holiday but it is right that that is clarified.

News, I sometimes have a meal from Weatherspoons for £12.95, it includes a pint of Doombar and a side portion if bread and butter, if anyone is wanting simple sliced bread and butter (as long as potential allergies allow) it is in the breakfast section sometimes staff don't know.

If DL is right one lunch equivalent invested could one day buy ten more. That sort of thing will happen somewhere at some point, which is fair enough, even a small holding can potentially bring a little happiness or satisfaction.

Closer to an hour ago on recollecting, bit of a slow type...

Banbury, you haven't been completely right for a whole month.

3rd June 2024, 10:15, in a reply to Maidit you said that your personal view was that the proposed deal with POW was dead or delayed.

The deal with POW completed on time.

Not all of your posts on this forum have been wrong, neither have Helpful's. Maidit has had some good moments aswell even though I don't always agree but that is also part of good conversation, reading and listening with respect.

In the fairly recent past Banbury, you have on occasion said you didn't think the deal with POW for 100% ownership of NBGC deal would happen, then on at least one occasion - qualified your opinion that it probably wasn't that important. Time will tell on the second part, the first has completed.

Banbury, if you are thinking of yourself you may be thinking incorrectly? If you are referring to yourself and you have only ever posted under your current nickname, then since joining the forum in October 2020, you have been here less than four years. Assuming your maths is good... perhaps you sometimes have a tendency to exaggerate?

Thanks Helpful, think I am understanding all of that... I did my calculations based of 21.6oz by the value of gold ×365, I don't how how I got 12.6m but on the second attempt it was 17.8m using approximation/rounding, appreciate based on stardard 90% functionaliy that would be 16 million US dollars accross 365 days. The costs for near surface and at surface gold mining are cheaper than deeper underground. I am assuming higher overall throughput numbers and full mechanisation would lead to higher daily output which could mean a higher annual total...

Thanks News, you are correct on that, I don't know what logic or mis-type I was doing to get 12.6m, still using approximation method I'm nke getting 17.8m accross 365 days which corresponds in close enough range to your calculation. I think the original was based on five days stockpile total. Cheers..

Am I reading the earlier stockpile modelling correctly?

I think the 243,000 US dollars was based on 5 days total which would multiplied by 365, rounded up equal 12.6 million US dollars. Based on 5 days stockpile alone, if I read that correctly - still good start - before fully mechanised which should be substantially more and I appreciate Helpful has further conversed with News regarding potential increase of productivity...

Helpful if you could clarify please, that would be appreciated, thanks...

Yeah, I agree with all of that and it may be what you had in mind, might just have been an unpleasant person who was fixating... the other thing to bear in mind: people will occasionally say things tha can't be verified and may even put on an "antic disposition" as a "justification" to attack a company for whatever motive.

I suppose people reading or in conversations could have all sorts back stories - which of of course, may well be a matter of privacy.

To good health...

Thanks News and Helfpful for your positive high quality posts and where I have thanked in the past, please consider that as ongoing.

Helpful, I supported your second post and aggreed with all of the first post, except the last sentence. Think you were aiming to point out sustained irrationality of stance - sustained irrationality isn't necessarily a sole determiner of mental illness, a person may be rational enough elsewhere in life. Someone could go into every international football tournament thinking their not typically successful team have a realistic chance of winning but that would only definitely be a problem if there were occasions when their team hadn't qualified.

Hope this evening's match goes well...

Cheers News, hopefully RRR will bear in mind considerations to which you refer on your penultimate paragraph at 15:05 today. I aim to offline by 15:15 but might have to quick read the next one...!

Nagambie.... correcting my spelling.