Member Info for NigelHaemoglobin

Tom, the £2 approx it cost me to read P Braileys article was the best money I ever spent!!

No, that a thermogenic gas kitchen was discovered, a commercial gas reservoir has NOT been identified but keep your skirt on Bradders: the rigless testing might locate something useful.

The major geopolitical issue bugging me at the moment is the concentration on marginally profitable CNG developments. Access to the Maghreb pipeline is not simple: political control switches between Morocco and Algeria, ullage is a necessity which may not be available if discoveries are made in other N.A areas by operators with deep pockets and greasy political connections (corruption).

I actually snorted my coffee out listening to Griffiths gloating about his ‘methods’ in relation to Conoco Phillips! Pure comedy: one company with massive resources and connections, the other working out of a proverbial shed without a pot to p*ss in…

When we are provided with the actual unattenuated truth? Does that sound reasonable?

https://www.lse.co.uk/DirectorsDeals.asp?shareprice=PRD&share=Predator-Oil

Top of the leader board for totally inexplicable director sells, read Peter Brailey’s article.

QUITE EXTRAORDINARY, none of the cheap suited salesman of the 1980’s ie GRH have been able to explain this behaviour.

Thanks Poker, Wise

Bit of a problem with the website I think. Either way I’m expecting huge news soon and have increased accordingly.

Sorry for being a midwit, what are the asterisks replacing.

One could vary the definition of 'Ad hominen' from is it somewhat directed at a persons' identity to a form of 'Ad hominem' approach in which insidiously slimy and trained psychological manipulators effortlessly change peoples thinking.

This is what SALESMEN and serial RAMPERS do all the time: no thought is given to what ever else ordinary Jo could be doing with his hard earned: insulating his home for example hoho.

Would any of you choose RKH as a new equity for your portfolios if researching this week?

Fear of Regret
Fear of regret, or simply regret theory, deals with the emotional reaction people experience after realizing they've made an error in judgment. Faced with the prospect of selling a stock, investors become emotionally affected by the price at which they purchased the stock.3 So, they avoid selling it as a way to avoid the regret of having made a bad investment, as well as the embarrassment of reporting a loss. We all hate to be wrong, don't we?

I have already flogged half of my 5.5p arbitration punt, my opinion is that the ECT court will be negative about Moodys' powers of due diligence.

After all, everything else has turned to rat sh*t. 'Full cycle E and P? Anyone remember that delusion?

Sefton I posted over two years ago that it would be unusual for a 'garden shed' type outfit like PRD to have significant exclusivity on the main CO2 source in TnT.

Turns out that I was correct and the dreaded GHG will be up for negotiation again soon. If it was me I would sequestrate the damned stuff into depleted reservoirs and P and A it for good.

Any environmentalist would spot immediately that producing hydrocarbon stink-gunk by virtually any means is bad for our planet: no matter what wee Griffiths batters on about...

There are no trolls/avatars or flying Edam cheese monsters Mrs Sefton of Eastbourne urinary catheter club.

Only figments of your febrile afternoon naps.

I've supported companies like this one before, open offers, rights issues etc. We are still high risk but approaching the inflexion point, by that I mean: contract wins, banking facilities (requires consistent revenue), healthy dividend cover ratios and subsequent mandatory equity market purchases by the tracker funds.

Could all turn to a pile of steamies BUT, with a five to ten year time horizon I am targeting £4/ share with annual dividends and the occasional special dividend.

Good luck all!

Corporal Sefton, the salesman on this BB ie GRH, MEM, Mick and the others LOVE numpties like you.

Guercif may indeed have large and commercially viable reservoirs but we have NO EVIDENCE of that. The real problem which you should focus on as an 'investor' is: can PRD afford to locate such a possible reservoir before being obliterated...

BPC would have eventually made an offshore discovery but ten wells may have been needed, obliterated. PVR could have found an elephant plus on the Atlantic Margin: nearly obliterated. TRP could have found a super massive volume offshore Namibia: almost obliterated.

I could fill two pages of A4 with similar and sad stories...sob etc.

Well I missed it completely, erroneously assuming that it was a private fund which would contribute to E and P costs. Totally my error based on basic searches for Theseus info.

Just another amateur prone to errors, definitely learnt something though.

Mick I remain alarmed at the lack of alarm here, I was asleep on my own watch when I started punting on PRD. My glaring error was to miss the Theseus angle: really blows Griffiths 'skin in the game' status away.

I admit to making a blunder, search T Winnifrith's site for Predator: 5 really great pieces of journalism.

The error was slightly forced on me by Griffiths' natural sliminess but I know what he is now and I'm watching him like a hawk...

Or Michael, why not do as you should and hold Griffiths' proverbial tootsies to the flame?

Most here are being serially bullsh*tted to by the company and lapping it all up. This is what I find the most exasperating!

Are you sure? My impression of nwnf is that it is a form of pseudo pro bono publico. If RKH were a wealthy entity they could have evaluated the case and if enacted much lower legal fees would be expected.

Just be careful of the non sequitur that success is likely on the basis that a nwnf case is being fought.

My assumption is that a 1:3 estimate of success would be reasonable in order to take a case on. Not my speciality: just trying critical reasoning to the problem.

LTT I would advise some caution re the theory that a no-win no-fee case means that success is likely: the fee calculation is based on the assumption that many cases fail, hence the richness of such fees in the success case...

All we need to light up the SP is solid engineering contract news, forget IM: it will go to judicial review either way...

Sticking with my contract V imminent placing calcs but slightly more bearish at 75:25...

Agree Rot1, I have sold down significantly my arbitration punt.

Unfortunately and with all due respect your profile ie XEL, BPC, DES etc identifies you as a target for AIM spivs, salesmen and blatherskites selling the dream of great wealth while at the same time fully aware of the horrendous technical and financial risks. Geopolitics only amplifies risk.

Were you aware that Anglophone Cameroonian separatism was the priority risk at Bowleven? Ever looked at the (original) licence map with reference to Ambazonia?

The usual type of cheap suited salesmen are on the march at PRD and doubtless many other V high risk AIM weaners...to be clear few of them would ever have been able to raise funds without popular support forcing the share price up for dilutions...

TT there may be trolling but in my case just icy cold rationalism...