Member Info for news

Ref 12:30. Yes, hence I came to check on my status, on this forum and to do that, I post. In summary, it does illustrate that there is external --oversight--as on all social media by the site owner and they have rules to comply with the laws.

Having said that, it is also equally clear that discussion of the =personal= appears to have --no bearing--on discussion of this stock, for which this site has been set up to do. Same goes for American, Australian stock chat sites & Twitter, the latter of which is even more stringent & well known --rules are published prior to pressing post. In general, it would have to be ==proven ==or "proof" & "context" as NikeAir180 stated at 09:17 today, Tues, 6 Aug 2024. Thank you. News, Tues, 6 Aug 2024. [P.S. Similarly, I will not have to reply to anything personal as it is outside the scope & raison d' etre of this forum.?]

-----------------------------Posts removed-------------------

NikeAir180: Further to your post at 09:17 stating a post about a poster on this forum should --not-- have been posted, I have just checked & it has been --removed.-- Another post about me has also been --removed.-- [Dated yesterday, Mon, 6.8.24.] Yes, posting personal details is not within the scope of the posting rules and hence the removal of that post.

I wanted to check on the status. News, Tues, 6 Aug 2024.

Just listened to the Stephen Sanderson interview conducted by Sarah Lowther, London South East with thanks today, 6.8.24. Mr Sanderson is speaking to JV partners- Billion $ project ? Others can listen to check as it is above this page. Tues, 6 Aug 2024.

It is now 06:42 in Vancover and 09:42 in Toronto and 09:42 in New York but 2:38pm, Tues, in Britain. You were right, NikeAir180 and my post below is prescient. You were right as well that I appear to be the "subject". So, yes, its is best to take my leave. If in the U.K, then it can be discussed outside this forum given it has nothing to do with RRR either. No one else outside is interested in scutiny of others without merit. I am ==not==obliged to reply as it is not about RRR the topic and raison d' etre of this site. Head of Admin told me to just "filter." So, no reply does not mean ==cant answer==but chose not to as I dont have to answer anything of the nature raised here or has it occurred in real life. Everyone gone from this forum @RRR, I notice so I will too and leave the enquirer , given it is over and over about nothing to do with anything RRR. News, Tues, 5 Aug 2024.

------------------------------------------NikeAir180 et all----------------------

Yesterday, when I looked at Investor's Chronicle data on RRR [& from the FT], I recall seeing it was +50% from the 0.035p in June 2024. This is my 2nd time on this forum & perhaps I should have taken more note that 1st time round, it was only Banburyboy, Helpful and Specinvestor99 in the main. There appears no change from then & more investors have gone due to non-RRR subject matter discussed but rather ad hominem which is of no interest to shareholders of RRR. In recent days, posts start appearing in the evening and or into the early hours of the morning, UK time breaching 2 time zones. NikeAir180 had to reply at 4am+, some 2 days ago. Suffice to say, the same is also over at ADVFN RRR especially after 1 word was posted on 1 Aug 2024 -except for the 1-2 that usually are located there, the rest have gone. Silence now rules that forum. So, I wanted to inform you NIKEAIR180 that, it is time for me to take my leave , not because of anything else except that posting only feeds more posts & fresh ad hominem. So, I ---confirm--that I am taking the example of everyone else to leave as it takes too much time reply into early hours outside UK time posting hours as the stock market closes at 4.30pm. I hope you are rested from the 4am+ of having to reply and wish to thank you for your impartial posting to correct postings. Thanks also to Helpful, Maidit308, HawaiiFive0 et all. With best wishes and regards, News, Tues, 5 Aug 2024 @2:30pm. P.S. If folks were really interested in RRR, they would welcome any research and news but that doesnt appear to be the case. As I said the legendary von Greyrz used ---All Caps---and no one is saying anything is wrong like here, even for the non-all post in caps. One more important note: Over at the other RRR forum, one has "demurred" from advocacy help from one using Perry Mason books alone-that appears to tell one that in the real world, it will require proof and not just mere broad splashing of criticism without legal merit -hence "demur" from another RRR v G.C case, isnt it? Not editing.

It was up 122% per Kobeisse Letter today. Helpful mentioned that IG has closed all shorts ie cannot buy RRR short and it is only closing & no new opening of RRR shorts. Just before this rise of VILX, I mentioned that I tried at HL and it not open to trading. Hmm, interesting as to now the context of what is means ? Thank you to Helpful for checking for me at IG when I made the request. Mon, 5.8.24.

Cramer has just said that gold held up better than crypto. This is about the fall of crypto prices and hence the gold experts are also commenting on gold - crypto. Egon von Greyerz was a banker in Geneva and then 17 years as Finance Director & Vice-Chairman of Dixons. Egon "forecasted the current present problems in the economy well over 10 yrs ago. In 2002, he recommended gold at $300 per oz." Link: https://goldbroker.com/author/egon-von-greyerz

Greyerz's latest tweet is via https://x.com/GoldSwitzerland/status/1820385466400584039 It is all about gold & crypto due to the "stock crash". One will note, 4 of the tweets in the last 24 hrs are ==all== in CAPS.

Relevance: RRR has quite a few gold projects and therefore the price of gold is of interest. Whether projects come on stream or current, the price of gold is one of the criterias. Mon, 5.8.24 [Everything answered now and note the ==difference== in using some caps and all caps. One bigger account also uses caps as that is 1 of the posting styles on Twitter is it not?

Re :10.29 --I tend to stick to 1 stock to post from. RRR is quite a difficult stock to research because there are many projects in countries that I am not familiar with for mining. So, hence Helpful was kind enough to point the way which cut a lot of research time. Relating to the post on the other forum, it was cited but it is hard to check as I said it may not be in that form. Putting in effort, as I said, I have not put in any substantive amount & hence RRR was not a matter of put all the eggs in the basket kinda of thing. Yes, of course it is option money and HawaiiFive0 mentioned it also and that is true of many stocks on AIM - data shows it. ==If=, only RRR was affected, fair enough but the overall data shows the same type of falls for many junior explorers & well documented. NICKAIR180 - thank you for the effort you put in & wishing you every blessing from Providence. Not editing. Awaiting some news from Chairman Bell given last Sun, he posted the pic of him somewhere in Africa after being asked by an investor where he was. It was followed up as to whether he was in FASO, DRC or London. Chairman Bell said spiritually in London but physically in Africa.

I have to inform re: 10:18 post, Mon, 5.8.24 [typo earlier left out 8]: No, I confirm that I had not questioned the poster's "profession & ethnicity" at all. It was ---self disclosed---when there is no need to given it was added that as a result, an expert? As for ethnicity, Mbele was used to talk about Chairman Bell and therefore, others provided the meaning of that word , not me as I was not aware it was a DRC word used there [surname & a place]. Suffice to say, it was deleted so why?

As for NikeAir180 at 10:18, yes, that is the case then. There was no buy attached & it was just recording the share price of RRR. I was interested in the recent news of the RRR DRC potential settlement of the licence matter. This is still pending.

The markets last night had taken a dive and from Google Finance that I have just checked , it is still at the --same range--of within the spread.

NikeAir180

It was too late to post but I had a look at that Quora article cited at 02:22. As one knows, Quora is a discussion group & I didnt see the subject matter mentioned. I then re-checked the title for evidence based statistics and came across a Harvard Law article based on a book by a Professor & others in Law & as one knows, the innocent have gone to jail. To put a title like that is not suitable for a stock forum because no one here is from that category. Further & more importantly, there was a whole para --inserted in that was--the writers --own--idea, although I did not read the whole of the Quora discussion. Suffice to say, the Quora discussion does not appear to be supported by evidence based statistics. I recall a conversation on this forum of "lies" being told about the RRR DRC litigation by 1 of the $430m region potential further claim [x2] from recall - I got that from the Clean Capital Broker Note. I checked further the extensive --Auditors--statement from the Annual Report of RRR that details the DRC RRR litigation & it was mentioned from recall. So, I leave it there. I dont want to go into a long dissertation which is boring but suffice to say, one checks & it has not stood up to ... Mon.5.24.

Typo: Should read, not got a reputation on this site for "lying" as I give links to check per good practice advocated by Hotcopper , the Australian stock forum. No one has ever heard that using "For the Avoidance of Doubt" or "For Clarity" or the American style "For Emphasis" used by Toedt III, American Attorney & P/t Professor of Law Practice is deem to be usage for "lying" - no where does it teach that. I gave the link to Toedt III as to what the term means as it is standard contract terminology.

Not everyone can become like another for style of writing and no one in work says one must follow just 1 style of writing, otherwise, we would all be just robots with robot thinking . ? I am off now. News, Sun, 4.8.24

-------------After the Investors Chronicle 1 Analyst Target Price Link was posted today, Sun, 4.8.24-------------

--Not-- one sound from others as to the Analyst Target Price given for the next 12 months [note the Investor Chronicle gives the usual note at the end] . I am wondering why , given all day today, one has seen and read posts, after posts about RRR by all on this forum.

I waited all day to see the reaction -comments but ----not 1 comment---at all and of course logical and reason suggests that because Investors Chronicle is owned by the Financial Times , whose parent co is Pearson Plc with a market cap of £6.96 Billion, perhaps it is too big to state,.....? I dont know but I found it interesting.

This is given 1 and another poster on this forum got called names that "I am 1 of the Gullible Twins?"- am I just because i am not listening to what is posted on this forum as the only source of views? I have never taken forum views but rather done my own due diligence as far as I can by searching out the reports etc in the public domain and one is advised to do so. I heard from someone that Paul Johnson said he knew who to listen to and of course the rest if history now isnt it? Paul is only 1 of the few , if not the only 1, going from small savings to now a High Net Worth from what he initially made from RRR per other folks? So, Paul knew he was not obliged to just listen to folks only on forum but he was aware he has the freedom to choose who to listen to, isnt it? Britain is a democracy and there is freedom to think independently relating to stock investments. That is what many legends in junior mining teach eg Rick Rule etc isnt it?

So, not gullible and from my record on this site, I have not got a reputation of not "telling lies2 as I was called last night just for using "For the Avoidance of Doubt" or "For Clarity", which is standard speak for British lawyers per Toed III, an American Attorney and Professor of Law Practice. No one thinks that using this term is akin to "lying" and therefore not correct to state such.

Contd: Got cut off.

--------------No one on this site got banned for using "naysayer" which Cambridge dictionary states: "Someone who says something is >>not possible>wrong if someone else does not understand normal terms of practice as above >>>Confirmed >> by a link to what Toed III, American Attorney stated.There is "No " lies just because I use for The Avoidance of Doubt.

Sun, 4.8.24 NikeAir180: I hope you dont mind because if I keep silent , it means that I cannot provide a reply and since it is about me, then I have to state and confirm as above myself. Thank you for last night's post. I am off now to have some tea and then to look at the Australian Stock Market before zzz [sleep].

Even Toed III, American Attorney & Professor of Law is cognisant of American & UK law to use different terms of law usage.

NikeAir180

That's what I thought but I will stated very clearly to everyone on this forum & site that NO LIES were told just because the word used was "For The Avoidance of Doubt" or "For Clarity" which Dell D.C Toedt III, a practising Attorney and P/t Professor of Practice [Law] stated that he uses "For Emphasis" instead of the above because For "The Avoidance of Doubt" & "For Clarity" is used by >>"British Lawyers">>>. Toedt III must be very expert in the terminology given he is a Professor of Practice ie as in the Law of Practice which means not just academic law only but practice as well.

If Toedt III states he used "For Emphasis" as an American Attorney and >>>does not follow>>>British lawyers, that is fine as I never learnt the American version of "For Emphasis." I received a letter and I note that a whole paragraph was after the signature and in >>darkened print>>> so that one will not miss it with so much of content in the body of the letter. I note solicitors use >>darkened print and underline>>> as well since they have the facility to do so on their computers but on this site, there is no darkened print to use so that one can find key words easily. Years ago, I posted on the Solgold forum on this site and I used Caps as there was no darkened print to use here on this site, and one said it >>helps>>to see the >>bull .et pointsdisagree>>No One in the Legal Profession

research tree is a subscription site and it also caters to professionals in the finance industry. i know one or two people on other forums who are professional subscribers to research tree. all research tree provides is broker reports ie the latest.

research tree: red rock resources

the free info is as follows: "frequency of research reports: 8 per year. research reports on red rock resources plc: 31. providers covering red rock resources: 3 ." link: https://*********************/companies/uk/resources/red-rock-resources-plc/rrr/lon [one will note that to access the reports, one has to sign in and that will be by subscription as reports are under the new rules?]

NikeAir180

Would you be kind enough to point out what is "the lie" per 19:37 post. What is the "lie" that must be pointed out to others? It was not stated and hence, no one can follow given there is "no lie" posted. Thank you. I ask you because you are good at locating and following all the various posts on this forum today. Thank you. Sun, 4.8.24.

Contd : Got cut off.

So, the question is, IF, I dont follow this forum on what is being posted only on this forum today, am I then classified as "Gullible?". I dont think that is from the FCA's Guidance to listen only to posters on a forum who have their views on aspects of this co? On Twitter, under the RRR thread, I dont see the same view as posted today on this forum? Just askin. Sun, 4.8.24.

Contd : Got cut off.

So, am I called Gullible? by 1 on this forum at 19:30, Sun 4.8.24 because I am >>not followingIF

At 19:30, Sun 4.8.24, I was called 1 of the "Gullible Twins"? My understand is that from reading of today's posts on this London South East Forum at RRR, one has been told [not by NikeAir180 or Helpful] about this RRR's financial position, projects etc.

Any reader could be forgiven for puzzlement because the commentary is not found elsewhere. In bigger stocks, say, the Elephant Oil [RRR Investee Co] neighbour which I am following as it is now going to target depth as and when. Americans cite Heywood Broker Report with price targets, oil risked and unrisked etc. In addition, I also note that >>>No American Investors>> are providing their own commentary about -------their own Share Price targets----but rather, they follow convention to cite the Broker Report or Analyst covering the stock. This also is what I understand from Australian investors when I visit Hotcopper Stock Forum for Investors --they also cite Analyst/s share price target and >>never their own

Contd

Got cut off -faulty ? I ended my post with I >>>cannot provide warranty>>> as the source of the data is from ---an external source-----and not derived from me. This is well understood by investors on this site as that is a general principle of all external source data cited.

As NikeAir180 said, it is >>>"Not Endorsement" but confirmation of "detail" and Nike said it was for Banburyboy et all relating to the title header and my post of 18:55 from InvestorsChronicle owned by FT. As an ---example only---I have checked Solgold via the FT and they have 3 analysts covering the stock with share price targets. I also checked as an example from Investors Chronicle, owned also by Financial Times and they cite the >>>same